

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Gas is flared off during an oil drilling operation in the Permian Basin oil field on March 12, 2022 in Stanton, Texas. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
The U.S. oil and gas industry is openly lauding elements of a reconciliation package that includes historic renewable energy investments, a response likely to heighten climate advocates' wariness of the bill as Democrats look to push it through the Senate as soon as next week.
The legislation, whose scope and ambitions were dictated by fossil fuel industry ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), includes components "that are helpful to our business," Rich Walsh of Valero said during the fossil fuel giant's earnings call on Thursday, referring to tax credits in the 725-page bill that could benefit the company.
"We can't afford to double down on fossil fuels at this late stage of the climate crisis."
Valero wasn't alone in celebrating aspects of the bill that President Joe Biden hailed Thursday as "the most significant legislation in history to tackle the climate crisis"--an emergency for which the fossil fuel industry is responsible.
Politico reported Thursday that the oil and gas industry--which has spent more than $200 million since last year to tank climate legislation--has "identified provisions that may make the climate medicine go down a little easier."
For instance, fossil fuel companies that are already posting record profits could benefit massively from the part of the legislation that requires drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Alaska. Another potential boon is the bill's mandate that oil and gas lease sales be held before the federal government can greenlight new solar and wind development.
"If you look at the pros and cons, the pros generally outweigh the cons," an unnamed oil and gas industry lobbyist told Politico. "The Easter eggs that Manchin forced into the bill on leasing, they're a big deal."
The American Petroleum Institute, the fossil fuel industry's largest U.S. trade organization, responded less enthusiastically, but still welcomed what it described as "some improved provisions in the spending package."
Barrons reported Thursday that ExxonMobil, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, and Equitrans Midstream could be among the bill's leading beneficiaries given its incentives for carbon capture technology, which climate advocates and scientists have decried as a false solution pushed by oil companies trying to stop genuine efforts to slash emissions.
"The legislation extends a tax credit for carbon capture and storage that oil companies can claim based on how much carbon they capture and sequester," Barrons noted. "Exxon has made carbon capture a centerpiece of its low-carbon investments, and wants to build hubs in industrial areas where several companies could collaborate on projects... While it's still a relatively small business, the big oil companies could start growing their projects quickly with federal help."
Such provisions have drawn the ire of climate organizations that argue the bill's sizable renewable energy spending could be undermined by its promotion of new fossil fuel production and reliance on industry-backed faux solutions.
"The Inflation Reduction Act injects $369 billion into programs to support renewable energy production and innovation and creates the clean energy economy that can power this country into the future, while finally spending real money to clean up deadly fossil fuels pollution. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and we urge the Senate to seize it," said Abigail Dillen, the president of Earthjustice.
"At the same time," Dillen continued, "we have to recognize the many provisions in this bill that hold back progress. Tax credits that extend the life of dirty coal plants will make it harder to reach critical targets for clean power, and we are outraged that this deal would undermine historic investments in clean energy by holding wind and solar projects hostage to massive new oil and gas leasing off our coasts and on our public lands."
"We can't afford to double down on fossil fuels at this late stage of the climate crisis," she added.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. oil and gas industry is openly lauding elements of a reconciliation package that includes historic renewable energy investments, a response likely to heighten climate advocates' wariness of the bill as Democrats look to push it through the Senate as soon as next week.
The legislation, whose scope and ambitions were dictated by fossil fuel industry ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), includes components "that are helpful to our business," Rich Walsh of Valero said during the fossil fuel giant's earnings call on Thursday, referring to tax credits in the 725-page bill that could benefit the company.
"We can't afford to double down on fossil fuels at this late stage of the climate crisis."
Valero wasn't alone in celebrating aspects of the bill that President Joe Biden hailed Thursday as "the most significant legislation in history to tackle the climate crisis"--an emergency for which the fossil fuel industry is responsible.
Politico reported Thursday that the oil and gas industry--which has spent more than $200 million since last year to tank climate legislation--has "identified provisions that may make the climate medicine go down a little easier."
For instance, fossil fuel companies that are already posting record profits could benefit massively from the part of the legislation that requires drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Alaska. Another potential boon is the bill's mandate that oil and gas lease sales be held before the federal government can greenlight new solar and wind development.
"If you look at the pros and cons, the pros generally outweigh the cons," an unnamed oil and gas industry lobbyist told Politico. "The Easter eggs that Manchin forced into the bill on leasing, they're a big deal."
The American Petroleum Institute, the fossil fuel industry's largest U.S. trade organization, responded less enthusiastically, but still welcomed what it described as "some improved provisions in the spending package."
Barrons reported Thursday that ExxonMobil, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, and Equitrans Midstream could be among the bill's leading beneficiaries given its incentives for carbon capture technology, which climate advocates and scientists have decried as a false solution pushed by oil companies trying to stop genuine efforts to slash emissions.
"The legislation extends a tax credit for carbon capture and storage that oil companies can claim based on how much carbon they capture and sequester," Barrons noted. "Exxon has made carbon capture a centerpiece of its low-carbon investments, and wants to build hubs in industrial areas where several companies could collaborate on projects... While it's still a relatively small business, the big oil companies could start growing their projects quickly with federal help."
Such provisions have drawn the ire of climate organizations that argue the bill's sizable renewable energy spending could be undermined by its promotion of new fossil fuel production and reliance on industry-backed faux solutions.
"The Inflation Reduction Act injects $369 billion into programs to support renewable energy production and innovation and creates the clean energy economy that can power this country into the future, while finally spending real money to clean up deadly fossil fuels pollution. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and we urge the Senate to seize it," said Abigail Dillen, the president of Earthjustice.
"At the same time," Dillen continued, "we have to recognize the many provisions in this bill that hold back progress. Tax credits that extend the life of dirty coal plants will make it harder to reach critical targets for clean power, and we are outraged that this deal would undermine historic investments in clean energy by holding wind and solar projects hostage to massive new oil and gas leasing off our coasts and on our public lands."
"We can't afford to double down on fossil fuels at this late stage of the climate crisis," she added.
The U.S. oil and gas industry is openly lauding elements of a reconciliation package that includes historic renewable energy investments, a response likely to heighten climate advocates' wariness of the bill as Democrats look to push it through the Senate as soon as next week.
The legislation, whose scope and ambitions were dictated by fossil fuel industry ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), includes components "that are helpful to our business," Rich Walsh of Valero said during the fossil fuel giant's earnings call on Thursday, referring to tax credits in the 725-page bill that could benefit the company.
"We can't afford to double down on fossil fuels at this late stage of the climate crisis."
Valero wasn't alone in celebrating aspects of the bill that President Joe Biden hailed Thursday as "the most significant legislation in history to tackle the climate crisis"--an emergency for which the fossil fuel industry is responsible.
Politico reported Thursday that the oil and gas industry--which has spent more than $200 million since last year to tank climate legislation--has "identified provisions that may make the climate medicine go down a little easier."
For instance, fossil fuel companies that are already posting record profits could benefit massively from the part of the legislation that requires drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Alaska. Another potential boon is the bill's mandate that oil and gas lease sales be held before the federal government can greenlight new solar and wind development.
"If you look at the pros and cons, the pros generally outweigh the cons," an unnamed oil and gas industry lobbyist told Politico. "The Easter eggs that Manchin forced into the bill on leasing, they're a big deal."
The American Petroleum Institute, the fossil fuel industry's largest U.S. trade organization, responded less enthusiastically, but still welcomed what it described as "some improved provisions in the spending package."
Barrons reported Thursday that ExxonMobil, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, and Equitrans Midstream could be among the bill's leading beneficiaries given its incentives for carbon capture technology, which climate advocates and scientists have decried as a false solution pushed by oil companies trying to stop genuine efforts to slash emissions.
"The legislation extends a tax credit for carbon capture and storage that oil companies can claim based on how much carbon they capture and sequester," Barrons noted. "Exxon has made carbon capture a centerpiece of its low-carbon investments, and wants to build hubs in industrial areas where several companies could collaborate on projects... While it's still a relatively small business, the big oil companies could start growing their projects quickly with federal help."
Such provisions have drawn the ire of climate organizations that argue the bill's sizable renewable energy spending could be undermined by its promotion of new fossil fuel production and reliance on industry-backed faux solutions.
"The Inflation Reduction Act injects $369 billion into programs to support renewable energy production and innovation and creates the clean energy economy that can power this country into the future, while finally spending real money to clean up deadly fossil fuels pollution. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and we urge the Senate to seize it," said Abigail Dillen, the president of Earthjustice.
"At the same time," Dillen continued, "we have to recognize the many provisions in this bill that hold back progress. Tax credits that extend the life of dirty coal plants will make it harder to reach critical targets for clean power, and we are outraged that this deal would undermine historic investments in clean energy by holding wind and solar projects hostage to massive new oil and gas leasing off our coasts and on our public lands."
"We can't afford to double down on fossil fuels at this late stage of the climate crisis," she added.