

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Supporters of Julian Assange demonstrate in front of the British Home Office in London on May 17, 2022. (Photo: Li Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images)
With the U.K. home secretary expected to decide this week whether to approve Julian Assange's extradition to the United States to face prosecution for publishing classified information, a group of more than 300 medical professionals elevated its call Monday for the British government to immediately free the WikiLeaks founder or be complicit in his "slow-motion execution."
"Under conditions in which the U.K. legal system has failed to take Mr. Assange's current health status into account, no valid decision regarding his extradition may be made, by yourself or anyone else," Doctors for Assange, a coalition of representing physicians and other medical professionals from 35 countries, wrote in a letter to U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel and Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
"The extradition of a person with such compromised health... is medically and ethically unacceptable."
The group noted that Assange's physical and mental health has been steadily deteriorating since 2019, when he was forcibly removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and jailed in a high-security prison under conditions that human rights experts have deemed torture.
"During the extradition proceedings, the [U.K. Supreme Court] heard and accepted medical evidence that Mr. Assange's mental health was such that an extradition order, if imposed, would likely inflict substantial risk of suicide on him," Doctors for Assange wrote in the letter, which is dated June 10 and was released to the public on Monday.
"The subsequent 'assurances' of the United States government that Mr. Assange would not be treated inhumanly are worthless given their record of pursuit, persecution, and plotted murder of Mr. Assange in retaliation for his public interest journalism," the group added, pointing to reports that in 2017--then under the leadership of Mike Pompeo--the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency considered kidnapping or assassinating Assange.
Ultimately, the Trump administration opted to continue pursuing Assange's extradition, hoping to put him on trial for publishing classified material that exposed U.S. war crimes.
Despite warnings about the case's dangerous implications for press freedoms around the world, the Biden Justice Department has continued pushing the U.K. to extradite Assange to the U.S., where the WikiLeaks publisher could face up to 175 years in prison for committing a common act of journalism.
"Should he come to harm in the U.S. under these circumstances it is you, home secretary, who will be left holding the responsibility for that negligent outcome," the medical professionals warned. "The extradition of a person with such compromised health, moreover, is medically and ethically unacceptable."
"Home secretary, in making your decision as to extradition, do not make yourself, your government, and your country complicit in the slow-motion execution of this award-winning journalist, arguably the foremost publisher of our time," the letter continued. "Do not extradite Julian Assange; free him."
In April, a British judge formally signed off on the U.S. extradition request after months of legal proceedings, leaving it to Patel to decide whether to follow through with the order.
Days after the judge's decision, Reporters Without Borders and 19 other organizations sent a letter imploring Patel to "act in the interest of press freedom and journalism by refusing extradition and immediately releasing Mr. Assange from prison, where he has remained on remand for three years despite the great risks posed to his mental and physical health."
"His prosecution," the groups wrote, "would set a dangerous precedent that could be applied to any media outlet that published stories based on leaked information, or indeed any journalist, publisher, or source anywhere in the world. "
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
With the U.K. home secretary expected to decide this week whether to approve Julian Assange's extradition to the United States to face prosecution for publishing classified information, a group of more than 300 medical professionals elevated its call Monday for the British government to immediately free the WikiLeaks founder or be complicit in his "slow-motion execution."
"Under conditions in which the U.K. legal system has failed to take Mr. Assange's current health status into account, no valid decision regarding his extradition may be made, by yourself or anyone else," Doctors for Assange, a coalition of representing physicians and other medical professionals from 35 countries, wrote in a letter to U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel and Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
"The extradition of a person with such compromised health... is medically and ethically unacceptable."
The group noted that Assange's physical and mental health has been steadily deteriorating since 2019, when he was forcibly removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and jailed in a high-security prison under conditions that human rights experts have deemed torture.
"During the extradition proceedings, the [U.K. Supreme Court] heard and accepted medical evidence that Mr. Assange's mental health was such that an extradition order, if imposed, would likely inflict substantial risk of suicide on him," Doctors for Assange wrote in the letter, which is dated June 10 and was released to the public on Monday.
"The subsequent 'assurances' of the United States government that Mr. Assange would not be treated inhumanly are worthless given their record of pursuit, persecution, and plotted murder of Mr. Assange in retaliation for his public interest journalism," the group added, pointing to reports that in 2017--then under the leadership of Mike Pompeo--the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency considered kidnapping or assassinating Assange.
Ultimately, the Trump administration opted to continue pursuing Assange's extradition, hoping to put him on trial for publishing classified material that exposed U.S. war crimes.
Despite warnings about the case's dangerous implications for press freedoms around the world, the Biden Justice Department has continued pushing the U.K. to extradite Assange to the U.S., where the WikiLeaks publisher could face up to 175 years in prison for committing a common act of journalism.
"Should he come to harm in the U.S. under these circumstances it is you, home secretary, who will be left holding the responsibility for that negligent outcome," the medical professionals warned. "The extradition of a person with such compromised health, moreover, is medically and ethically unacceptable."
"Home secretary, in making your decision as to extradition, do not make yourself, your government, and your country complicit in the slow-motion execution of this award-winning journalist, arguably the foremost publisher of our time," the letter continued. "Do not extradite Julian Assange; free him."
In April, a British judge formally signed off on the U.S. extradition request after months of legal proceedings, leaving it to Patel to decide whether to follow through with the order.
Days after the judge's decision, Reporters Without Borders and 19 other organizations sent a letter imploring Patel to "act in the interest of press freedom and journalism by refusing extradition and immediately releasing Mr. Assange from prison, where he has remained on remand for three years despite the great risks posed to his mental and physical health."
"His prosecution," the groups wrote, "would set a dangerous precedent that could be applied to any media outlet that published stories based on leaked information, or indeed any journalist, publisher, or source anywhere in the world. "
With the U.K. home secretary expected to decide this week whether to approve Julian Assange's extradition to the United States to face prosecution for publishing classified information, a group of more than 300 medical professionals elevated its call Monday for the British government to immediately free the WikiLeaks founder or be complicit in his "slow-motion execution."
"Under conditions in which the U.K. legal system has failed to take Mr. Assange's current health status into account, no valid decision regarding his extradition may be made, by yourself or anyone else," Doctors for Assange, a coalition of representing physicians and other medical professionals from 35 countries, wrote in a letter to U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel and Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
"The extradition of a person with such compromised health... is medically and ethically unacceptable."
The group noted that Assange's physical and mental health has been steadily deteriorating since 2019, when he was forcibly removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and jailed in a high-security prison under conditions that human rights experts have deemed torture.
"During the extradition proceedings, the [U.K. Supreme Court] heard and accepted medical evidence that Mr. Assange's mental health was such that an extradition order, if imposed, would likely inflict substantial risk of suicide on him," Doctors for Assange wrote in the letter, which is dated June 10 and was released to the public on Monday.
"The subsequent 'assurances' of the United States government that Mr. Assange would not be treated inhumanly are worthless given their record of pursuit, persecution, and plotted murder of Mr. Assange in retaliation for his public interest journalism," the group added, pointing to reports that in 2017--then under the leadership of Mike Pompeo--the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency considered kidnapping or assassinating Assange.
Ultimately, the Trump administration opted to continue pursuing Assange's extradition, hoping to put him on trial for publishing classified material that exposed U.S. war crimes.
Despite warnings about the case's dangerous implications for press freedoms around the world, the Biden Justice Department has continued pushing the U.K. to extradite Assange to the U.S., where the WikiLeaks publisher could face up to 175 years in prison for committing a common act of journalism.
"Should he come to harm in the U.S. under these circumstances it is you, home secretary, who will be left holding the responsibility for that negligent outcome," the medical professionals warned. "The extradition of a person with such compromised health, moreover, is medically and ethically unacceptable."
"Home secretary, in making your decision as to extradition, do not make yourself, your government, and your country complicit in the slow-motion execution of this award-winning journalist, arguably the foremost publisher of our time," the letter continued. "Do not extradite Julian Assange; free him."
In April, a British judge formally signed off on the U.S. extradition request after months of legal proceedings, leaving it to Patel to decide whether to follow through with the order.
Days after the judge's decision, Reporters Without Borders and 19 other organizations sent a letter imploring Patel to "act in the interest of press freedom and journalism by refusing extradition and immediately releasing Mr. Assange from prison, where he has remained on remand for three years despite the great risks posed to his mental and physical health."
"His prosecution," the groups wrote, "would set a dangerous precedent that could be applied to any media outlet that published stories based on leaked information, or indeed any journalist, publisher, or source anywhere in the world. "