SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Protesters demonstrate outside the U.S. Supreme Court as justices considered partisan gerrymandering. (Photo: Shawn Thew/EPA-EFE)
Ohio's Republican-dominated Senate on Tuesday approved a congressional district map that critics say is designed to benefit the GOP--a move that sparked swift criticism of the state's lawmakers and bolstered demands for Congress to pass federal legislation to protect voting rights and outlaw gerrymandering.
Unveiled late Monday by Republican state lawmakers, the new map was advanced by the Ohio Senate Local Government and Elections Committee before being approved by the full upper chamber. It still needs approval from the Ohio House and GOP Gov. Mike DeWine.
"Announcing a new map late in the evening, just hours before a vote, with no opportunity or possibility even for in-depth analysis or discussion, is disrespectful," said Catherine Turcer, executive director of Common Cause Ohio, after the first vote.
\u201cAnd to think, Ohio lawmakers had the opportunity to restore voters' faith in the democratic process.\u201d— ACLU of Ohio (@ACLU of Ohio) 1637084584
"In 2018, Ohio voters overwhelmingly approved transparent and bipartisan mapmaking with meaningful opportunities for public input," Turcer added. "Ohio voters deserve better."
"It's incredibly disheartening," the Common Cause Ohio leader told The Columbus Dispatch.
\u201cOhio voters overwhelmingly supported redistricting reform in 2018. That's why @CommonCauseOhio Executive Director @CatherineTurcer says the state's less than transparent process is "incredibly disheartening." #FairMaps https://t.co/DLumKC7tzz\u201d— Common Cause (@Common Cause) 1637074366
Deidra Reese, statewide coordinator of the Ohio Unity Coalition, similarly noted that the schedule meant lawmakers had little time to hear from opponents of the map.
"I am disappointed that they didn't hear the pleas from hundreds of Ohioans for districts that are fair and representative of the people," Reese said, agreeing that "we deserve better" and calling on Ohio lawmakers to "reject this plan."
Ohio Senate Republicans highlight that the new map would only divide 12 counties and keep seven of the state's eight biggest cities in single districts. They also claim seven of Ohio's 15 districts would be competitive between Democratic and GOP candidates.
However, analyses suggest the new boundaries would only benefit Democrats in a few districts. As Cleveland.com detailed Tuesday:
The map as designed favors Republicans to win a 12-3 share of Ohio's congressional seats, according to modeling from Dave's Redistricting App, a widely used redistricting site. DRA rates the map as "OK" on compactness, competitiveness, and community splitting. It rates "very bad" for political proportionality, worse than the current map, which awards Republicans a 12-4 share.
The new map's 12-3 breakdown includes two toss-up districts. One, which includes Democratic Toledo Rep. Marcy Kaptur's district, leans slightly Republican, while another, incorporating outgoing GOP Rocky River Rep. Anthony Gonzalez's district, leans slightly Democratic. A district in the Cincinnati area represented by GOP Rep. Steve Chabot leans three points Republican, but Sen. Rob McColley, a Republican who is sponsoring the map plan, said President Joe Biden narrowly won the district in 2020.
Although former President Donald Trump remains committed to his "Big Lie" about the 2020 election, Biden won the national contest. However, despite Biden doing well in Ohio's major cities, Trump secured the Midwestern state by more than eight points.
Mother Jones' Ari Berman, author of Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America, said Tuesday that the "extreme gerrymandered congressional map" gives Republicans 80% of seats in a state where Trump won with 53% of the vote.
Responding to Berman's tweet, Nina Turner--a former Cleveland City Council member, Ohio state senator, and U.S. House candidate--said, "This is a damn shame."
\u201cThis is a damn shame.\u201d— Nina Turner (@Nina Turner) 1637094172
The Ohio House Government Oversight Committee is set to consider the map Wednesday morning. The full chamber has sessions scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday. Neither chamber is scheduled to meet next week, and the rapidly approaching deadline to finish the map is the end of the month.
The Dispatch explained that what happens in the state House could impact how long the map is in effect, if approved by all necessary parties. For the map to last a decade, it needs approval from 60% of lawmakers in each chamber and 33% of Democrats, which "amounts to 12 Democrats in the House and three in the Senate."
"Nobody wants a four-year map," said Senate Minority Leader Kenny Yuko (D-25), telling the newspaper he is aiming for a compromise. "If it's doable, if it's palatable, then I'll whip my caucus."
\u201cNo matter what happened over the past 5 election cycles (red waves, blue waves, odd trends, inspiring candidates, unpopular candidates, COVID, etc.,) the map performed *exactly* as it's architects intended.\n\nWE DO NOT WANT THE STATUS QUO TO CONTINUE. \n\n#FairMaps no more, no less.\u201d— ACLU of Ohio (@ACLU of Ohio) 1637098545
The battle over the map in Ohio--mirroring other GOP-controlled states--comes as congressional Democrats have been fighting to pass various voting rights legislation.
Earlier this month, all U.S. Senate Republicans expect Lisa Murkowski of Alaska prevented a floor debate on the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which came after the evenly divided chamber's GOP caucus twice blocked a package called the For the People Act as well as a later compromise bill, the Freedom to Vote Act.
That GOP obstruction as well as state Republican lawmakers' voter suppression bills and gerrymandering efforts this year have added fuel to calls for Senate Democrats to reform or even fully abolish the filibuster so they can quickly send an election reform bill to Biden's desk.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Ohio's Republican-dominated Senate on Tuesday approved a congressional district map that critics say is designed to benefit the GOP--a move that sparked swift criticism of the state's lawmakers and bolstered demands for Congress to pass federal legislation to protect voting rights and outlaw gerrymandering.
Unveiled late Monday by Republican state lawmakers, the new map was advanced by the Ohio Senate Local Government and Elections Committee before being approved by the full upper chamber. It still needs approval from the Ohio House and GOP Gov. Mike DeWine.
"Announcing a new map late in the evening, just hours before a vote, with no opportunity or possibility even for in-depth analysis or discussion, is disrespectful," said Catherine Turcer, executive director of Common Cause Ohio, after the first vote.
\u201cAnd to think, Ohio lawmakers had the opportunity to restore voters' faith in the democratic process.\u201d— ACLU of Ohio (@ACLU of Ohio) 1637084584
"In 2018, Ohio voters overwhelmingly approved transparent and bipartisan mapmaking with meaningful opportunities for public input," Turcer added. "Ohio voters deserve better."
"It's incredibly disheartening," the Common Cause Ohio leader told The Columbus Dispatch.
\u201cOhio voters overwhelmingly supported redistricting reform in 2018. That's why @CommonCauseOhio Executive Director @CatherineTurcer says the state's less than transparent process is "incredibly disheartening." #FairMaps https://t.co/DLumKC7tzz\u201d— Common Cause (@Common Cause) 1637074366
Deidra Reese, statewide coordinator of the Ohio Unity Coalition, similarly noted that the schedule meant lawmakers had little time to hear from opponents of the map.
"I am disappointed that they didn't hear the pleas from hundreds of Ohioans for districts that are fair and representative of the people," Reese said, agreeing that "we deserve better" and calling on Ohio lawmakers to "reject this plan."
Ohio Senate Republicans highlight that the new map would only divide 12 counties and keep seven of the state's eight biggest cities in single districts. They also claim seven of Ohio's 15 districts would be competitive between Democratic and GOP candidates.
However, analyses suggest the new boundaries would only benefit Democrats in a few districts. As Cleveland.com detailed Tuesday:
The map as designed favors Republicans to win a 12-3 share of Ohio's congressional seats, according to modeling from Dave's Redistricting App, a widely used redistricting site. DRA rates the map as "OK" on compactness, competitiveness, and community splitting. It rates "very bad" for political proportionality, worse than the current map, which awards Republicans a 12-4 share.
The new map's 12-3 breakdown includes two toss-up districts. One, which includes Democratic Toledo Rep. Marcy Kaptur's district, leans slightly Republican, while another, incorporating outgoing GOP Rocky River Rep. Anthony Gonzalez's district, leans slightly Democratic. A district in the Cincinnati area represented by GOP Rep. Steve Chabot leans three points Republican, but Sen. Rob McColley, a Republican who is sponsoring the map plan, said President Joe Biden narrowly won the district in 2020.
Although former President Donald Trump remains committed to his "Big Lie" about the 2020 election, Biden won the national contest. However, despite Biden doing well in Ohio's major cities, Trump secured the Midwestern state by more than eight points.
Mother Jones' Ari Berman, author of Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America, said Tuesday that the "extreme gerrymandered congressional map" gives Republicans 80% of seats in a state where Trump won with 53% of the vote.
Responding to Berman's tweet, Nina Turner--a former Cleveland City Council member, Ohio state senator, and U.S. House candidate--said, "This is a damn shame."
\u201cThis is a damn shame.\u201d— Nina Turner (@Nina Turner) 1637094172
The Ohio House Government Oversight Committee is set to consider the map Wednesday morning. The full chamber has sessions scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday. Neither chamber is scheduled to meet next week, and the rapidly approaching deadline to finish the map is the end of the month.
The Dispatch explained that what happens in the state House could impact how long the map is in effect, if approved by all necessary parties. For the map to last a decade, it needs approval from 60% of lawmakers in each chamber and 33% of Democrats, which "amounts to 12 Democrats in the House and three in the Senate."
"Nobody wants a four-year map," said Senate Minority Leader Kenny Yuko (D-25), telling the newspaper he is aiming for a compromise. "If it's doable, if it's palatable, then I'll whip my caucus."
\u201cNo matter what happened over the past 5 election cycles (red waves, blue waves, odd trends, inspiring candidates, unpopular candidates, COVID, etc.,) the map performed *exactly* as it's architects intended.\n\nWE DO NOT WANT THE STATUS QUO TO CONTINUE. \n\n#FairMaps no more, no less.\u201d— ACLU of Ohio (@ACLU of Ohio) 1637098545
The battle over the map in Ohio--mirroring other GOP-controlled states--comes as congressional Democrats have been fighting to pass various voting rights legislation.
Earlier this month, all U.S. Senate Republicans expect Lisa Murkowski of Alaska prevented a floor debate on the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which came after the evenly divided chamber's GOP caucus twice blocked a package called the For the People Act as well as a later compromise bill, the Freedom to Vote Act.
That GOP obstruction as well as state Republican lawmakers' voter suppression bills and gerrymandering efforts this year have added fuel to calls for Senate Democrats to reform or even fully abolish the filibuster so they can quickly send an election reform bill to Biden's desk.
Ohio's Republican-dominated Senate on Tuesday approved a congressional district map that critics say is designed to benefit the GOP--a move that sparked swift criticism of the state's lawmakers and bolstered demands for Congress to pass federal legislation to protect voting rights and outlaw gerrymandering.
Unveiled late Monday by Republican state lawmakers, the new map was advanced by the Ohio Senate Local Government and Elections Committee before being approved by the full upper chamber. It still needs approval from the Ohio House and GOP Gov. Mike DeWine.
"Announcing a new map late in the evening, just hours before a vote, with no opportunity or possibility even for in-depth analysis or discussion, is disrespectful," said Catherine Turcer, executive director of Common Cause Ohio, after the first vote.
\u201cAnd to think, Ohio lawmakers had the opportunity to restore voters' faith in the democratic process.\u201d— ACLU of Ohio (@ACLU of Ohio) 1637084584
"In 2018, Ohio voters overwhelmingly approved transparent and bipartisan mapmaking with meaningful opportunities for public input," Turcer added. "Ohio voters deserve better."
"It's incredibly disheartening," the Common Cause Ohio leader told The Columbus Dispatch.
\u201cOhio voters overwhelmingly supported redistricting reform in 2018. That's why @CommonCauseOhio Executive Director @CatherineTurcer says the state's less than transparent process is "incredibly disheartening." #FairMaps https://t.co/DLumKC7tzz\u201d— Common Cause (@Common Cause) 1637074366
Deidra Reese, statewide coordinator of the Ohio Unity Coalition, similarly noted that the schedule meant lawmakers had little time to hear from opponents of the map.
"I am disappointed that they didn't hear the pleas from hundreds of Ohioans for districts that are fair and representative of the people," Reese said, agreeing that "we deserve better" and calling on Ohio lawmakers to "reject this plan."
Ohio Senate Republicans highlight that the new map would only divide 12 counties and keep seven of the state's eight biggest cities in single districts. They also claim seven of Ohio's 15 districts would be competitive between Democratic and GOP candidates.
However, analyses suggest the new boundaries would only benefit Democrats in a few districts. As Cleveland.com detailed Tuesday:
The map as designed favors Republicans to win a 12-3 share of Ohio's congressional seats, according to modeling from Dave's Redistricting App, a widely used redistricting site. DRA rates the map as "OK" on compactness, competitiveness, and community splitting. It rates "very bad" for political proportionality, worse than the current map, which awards Republicans a 12-4 share.
The new map's 12-3 breakdown includes two toss-up districts. One, which includes Democratic Toledo Rep. Marcy Kaptur's district, leans slightly Republican, while another, incorporating outgoing GOP Rocky River Rep. Anthony Gonzalez's district, leans slightly Democratic. A district in the Cincinnati area represented by GOP Rep. Steve Chabot leans three points Republican, but Sen. Rob McColley, a Republican who is sponsoring the map plan, said President Joe Biden narrowly won the district in 2020.
Although former President Donald Trump remains committed to his "Big Lie" about the 2020 election, Biden won the national contest. However, despite Biden doing well in Ohio's major cities, Trump secured the Midwestern state by more than eight points.
Mother Jones' Ari Berman, author of Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America, said Tuesday that the "extreme gerrymandered congressional map" gives Republicans 80% of seats in a state where Trump won with 53% of the vote.
Responding to Berman's tweet, Nina Turner--a former Cleveland City Council member, Ohio state senator, and U.S. House candidate--said, "This is a damn shame."
\u201cThis is a damn shame.\u201d— Nina Turner (@Nina Turner) 1637094172
The Ohio House Government Oversight Committee is set to consider the map Wednesday morning. The full chamber has sessions scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday. Neither chamber is scheduled to meet next week, and the rapidly approaching deadline to finish the map is the end of the month.
The Dispatch explained that what happens in the state House could impact how long the map is in effect, if approved by all necessary parties. For the map to last a decade, it needs approval from 60% of lawmakers in each chamber and 33% of Democrats, which "amounts to 12 Democrats in the House and three in the Senate."
"Nobody wants a four-year map," said Senate Minority Leader Kenny Yuko (D-25), telling the newspaper he is aiming for a compromise. "If it's doable, if it's palatable, then I'll whip my caucus."
\u201cNo matter what happened over the past 5 election cycles (red waves, blue waves, odd trends, inspiring candidates, unpopular candidates, COVID, etc.,) the map performed *exactly* as it's architects intended.\n\nWE DO NOT WANT THE STATUS QUO TO CONTINUE. \n\n#FairMaps no more, no less.\u201d— ACLU of Ohio (@ACLU of Ohio) 1637098545
The battle over the map in Ohio--mirroring other GOP-controlled states--comes as congressional Democrats have been fighting to pass various voting rights legislation.
Earlier this month, all U.S. Senate Republicans expect Lisa Murkowski of Alaska prevented a floor debate on the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which came after the evenly divided chamber's GOP caucus twice blocked a package called the For the People Act as well as a later compromise bill, the Freedom to Vote Act.
That GOP obstruction as well as state Republican lawmakers' voter suppression bills and gerrymandering efforts this year have added fuel to calls for Senate Democrats to reform or even fully abolish the filibuster so they can quickly send an election reform bill to Biden's desk.
"So much for foreigners paying tariffs," commented one economic expert.
A leading inflation indicator surged much more than expected last month, just as the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs started to weigh on American businesses and consumers.
New Producer Price Index (PPI) numbers released on Thursday showed that wholesale prices rose by 0.9% over the last month and by 3.3% over the last year. These numbers were significantly higher than economists' consensus estimates of a 0.2% monthly rise and a 2.5% yearly rise in producer prices.
PPI is a leading indicator of future readings of the Consumer Price Index, the most widely cited gauge of inflation, as increases in wholesalers' prices almost inevitably get passed on to consumers. Economists have been predicting for months that Trump's tariffs on imported goods, which at the moment are higher than at any point in nearly 100 years, would lead to a spike in inflation.
Reacting to the higher-than-expected PPI number, some economic experts pinned the blame directly on the president.
"So much for foreigners paying tariffs," commented Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at tax consulting firm RSM US, on X. "If they did, PPI would be falling. Wholesale prices up 3.3% from a year ago and 3.7% in the core. The temperature is definitely rising in the core. This implies a hot PCE reading lies ahead."
Liz Pancotti, the managing director of policy and advocacy at the Groundwork Collaborative, took a deep dive into the numbers and found that Trump's tariffs were having an impact on a wide range of products.
"There is no mistaking it: President Trump's tariffs are hitting American farmers and driving up grocery prices for American families," she said. "Wholesale prices for grocery staples, like fresh vegetables (up 39% over the past month) and coffee (up 29% over the past year) are rising, squeezing American families even further in the checkout line."
Pancotti singled out the rise in milk prices as particularly worrisome for American families.
"Milk drove more than 30% of the increase in prices for unprocessed goods, rising by 9.1% in just the past month," she explained. "Tuesday's CPI print showed that milk prices rose by 1.9% in July, and this PPI data suggests further price hikes are on the way."
Betsey Stevenson, who served on former President Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, also pointed the finger at Trump's policies.
"Tariffs will cause higher prices," she said. "Volatility and uncertainty will cause higher prices. The PPI jump is not a surprise, it was inevitable."
On his Bluesky account, CNBC's Carl Quintanilla flagged analysis from economic research firm High Frequency Economics stating that the new PPI numbers were "a kick in the teeth for anyone who thought that tariffs would not impact domestic prices in the United States economy."
The firm added that it "will not be a long journey for producers' prices to translate into consumer prices" in the coming months.
Liz Thomas, the head of investment strategy at finance company SoFi, argued that the hot PPI numbers could further frustrate Trump's goal of getting the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates given that doing so would almost certainly boost inflation further.
"The increase in PPI was driven by services, and there were increases in general services costs and in the Trade component (i.e., wholesale/retail margins)," she commented. "The Fed won't like this report."
Ross Hendricks, an analyst at economic research firm Porter & Co., described the new report as "scorching hot" and similarly speculated that it would stop the Federal Reserve from cutting rates.
"Good luck with them rate cuts!" he wrote. "Can't recall the last time we've seen a miss that big on a single monthly inflation number."
Hedge fund manager and author Jeff Macke jokingly speculated that the bad PPI print would cause Trump to fire yet another government statistician just as he fired Erika McEntarfer, the former commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"Whoever compiles the PPI needs to update their CV," he wrote.
Just as with the monthly jobs report, the Bureau of Labor Statistics collects and publishes PPI data.
"The Trump administration is protecting lawbreaking corporate insiders from accountability instead of protecting Americans from corporate lawbreaking," said the author of a new Public Citizen report.
During the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump's administration has withdrawn or suspended enforcement actions against 165 companies in sectors across the U.S. economy, with Big Tech benefiting most from federal agencies' lax approach to corporate crime.
A report released Wednesday by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen found that the Trump administration has halted or ended a third of misconduct investigations and enforcement actions targeting technology firms—including behemoths such as Meta, Tesla, and Google.
Both Meta and Google donated to Trump's inaugural fund, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk spent big in support of the president's 2024 White House bid. Public Citizen found that the tech corporations that have benefited from Trump administration decisions to drop enforcement efforts have spent a combined $1.2 billion trying to influence the president.
"The Trump administration is protecting lawbreaking corporate insiders from accountability instead of protecting Americans from corporate lawbreaking," said Rick Claypool, a research director for Public Citizen and author of the new report. "To Big Tech corporations, this sends the message there is little risk in breaking the law in pursuit of profit—especially if you are an ally of the administration."
"For insiders," Claypool added, "corporate crime pays."
"Although he pretends to be tough on Big Tech, Donald Trump is a willing enabler of Big Tech's wrongdoing."
Public Citizen's report comes amid growing scrutiny of what one critic recently described as "the incredible shrinking Trump antitrust enforcers."
Despite claims of a "surging MAGA antitrust movement," Trump's Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission have repeatedly shown a willingness to bow to White House-connected lobbyists and allow corporate consolidation to proceed unabated. Last week, as Common Dreams reported, the Trump DOJ settled a Biden-era legal challenge against UnitedHealth Group, allowing the monopolist to swallow yet another competitor.
"The second Trump administration has now become a pay-to-play operation where influential MAGA lobbyists paid millions by large corporations use their clout with the president and Attorney General Pam Bondi to overrule the enforcers and push through mergers," The American Prospect's David Dayen wrote following news of the UnitedHealth settlement.
"It seems that if you're a company and can pony up the money," Dayen added, "you can get whatever regulatory treatment you wish. Bribery has gone in a few short months from a prohibited activity to the coin of the realm in Trump's America."
As Public Citizen's report showed, tech giants have been the chief beneficiaries of what the group characterized as the Trump administration's corrupt approach to corporate crime enforcement.
At the start of Trump's second term, at least 104 tech corporations faced more than 140 federal investigations and enforcement actions. The Trump administration has withdrawn or halted nearly 50 of those enforcement actions, Public Citizen found.
"Although he pretends to be tough on Big Tech, Donald Trump is a willing enabler of Big Tech's wrongdoing," Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, said in a statement. "For Big Tech, a relative pittance in political spending has generated gigantic returns in dropped prosecutions, policy U-turns, and aggressive administration support for Big Tech's global agenda."
Demonstrators yelled at federal agents to "get off our streets" as they set up a police checkpoint on a popular street in the nation's capital.
More than 100 protesters gathered late Wednesday at a checkpoint set up by a combination of local and federal officers on a popular street in Washington, D.C., where U.S. President Donald Trump has taken over the police force and deployed around 800 National Guard members as part of what he hopes will be a long-term occupation of the country's capital—and potentially other major cities.
The officers at the Wednesday night checkpoint reportedly included agents from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which is also taking part in immigration raids in the city. Some agents were wearing face coverings to conceal their identities.
After law enforcement agents established the checkpoint on 14th Street, protesters gathered and jeered the officers, chanting "get off our streets" and "go home fascists." Some demonstrators yelled at the agents standing at the checkpoint, while others warned oncoming drivers to turn to avoid the police installation.
There was no officially stated purpose for the checkpoint, but it came amid the Trump administration's lawless mass deportation campaign and its broader threats to deploy U.S. troops on the streets of American cities to crush dissent.
At least one person, a Black woman, was arrested at Wednesday's checkpoint. One D.C. resident posted to Reddit that agents were "pulling people out of cars who are 'suspicious' or if they don't like the answers to their questions." The Washington Post reported that a "mix of local and federal authorities pulled over drivers for seat belt violations or broken taillights."
The National Guard troops activated by Trump this week were not seen at the checkpoint, which shut down before midnight.
Wednesday night's protests are expected to be just the start as public anger mounts over Trump's authoritarian actions in the nation's capital—where violent crime fell to a 30-year low last year—and across the country.
Radley Balko, a journalist who has documented the growing militarization of U.S. police, wrote earlier this week that "the motivation for Donald Trump's plan to 'federalize' Washington, D.C., is same as his motivation for sending active-duty troops into Los Angeles, deporting people to the CECOT torture prison in El Salvador, his politicization of the Department of Justice, and nearly every other authoritarian overreach of the last six months: He is testing the limits of his power—and, by extension, of our democracy."
"He's feeling out what the Supreme Court, Congress, and the public will let him get away with. And so far, he's been able to do what he pleases," Balko wrote. "We are now past the point of crisis. Trump has long dreamed of presiding over a police state. He has openly admired and been reluctant to criticize foreign leaders who helm one. He has now appointed people who have expressed their willingness to help him achieve one to the very positions with the power to make one happen. And both he and his highest-ranking advisers have both openly spoken about and written out their plans to implement one."
"It's time to believe them," Balko added.