SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Afghan refugees are surrounded by security forces at the Poland-Belarus border on August 26, 2021. The group of migrants from Afghanistan has been stuck at the E.U.'s eastern border for several weeks as Belarus and Poland both refuse to let them in. (Photo: Maciej Moskwa/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Human rights advocates are demanding that policymakers across Europe do more to safely accomodate Afghan refugees within their countries after it was revealed Monday that the European Union is reportedly planning to thwart the arrival of people fleeing the war-torn nation.
"Based on lessons learned, the E.U. and its member states stand determined to act jointly to prevent the recurrence of uncontrolled large-scale illegal migration movements faced in the past, by preparing a coordinated and orderly response," E.U. ministers are expected to say during a Tuesday meeting about Afghanistan, according to a draft statement obtained by Reuters.
"The E.U. should also strengthen the support to the countries in Afghanistan's immediate neighborhood to ensure that those in need receive adequate protection primarily in the region," officials are expected to add.
In response, Judith Sunderland, associate director of the Europe and Central Asia division at Human Rights Watch, said, "Let's hope someone tells them that refugee movements are not illegal."
Instead of throwing up more barriers or delegating responsibility to surrounding countries, Sunderland argued, European officials should develop "concrete plans for helping Afghans reach safety in the E.U."
Pointing to a recent Human Rights Watch statement encouraging European countries to "lead global efforts to urgently facilitate safe passage from Afghanistan of civilians at risk from the Taliban," Sunderland called for "meaningful resettlement pledges, expanded and facilitated family reunification, and humanitarian visas and visa waivers."
Referring to recent reporting about Poland's "grotesque" refusal to admit Afghan asylum seekers, Sunderland added that she "look[s] forward to a pledge that any Afghans who arrive at E.U. borders seeking asylum will not be turned away."
\u201cAlso, look forward to a pledge that any Afghans who arrive at EU borders seeking asylum will not be turned away. Poland\u2019s refusal to let a group of Afghan asylum seekers cross its border is grotesque 3/4 https://t.co/lW2LUQqLFe\u201d— Judith Sunderland (@Judith Sunderland) 1630323815
Nearly a month after leaving Afghanistan, a group of Afghan refugees is still "marooned on the border between Poland and Belarus in a 'Kafkaesque' political standoff," The Guardian reported Sunday. "The 32 refugees--women, men, and a child of 15 years old--have been stuck in a small, muddy patch of land between the two countries for almost three weeks with no access to clean water, insufficient shelter, and intermittent food supplies."
"Despite seeking international protection in Poland, they are not being allowed in, with border guards preventing them from entering," the British newspaper noted. "Neither are they being allowed back into Belarus, where they came from in the hope of being able to cross into the European Union."
Thousands of Afghans have been evacuated from Kabul since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan just over two weeks ago, but many vulnerable Afghans remain stranded throughout the country as NATO airlifts come to an end.
The United Nations' Refugee Agency (UNHCR) warned Monday that "a far greater humanitarian crisis is just beginning" for Afghanistan's 39 million residents.
"In the midst of a clear emergency, with millions in dire need of help, the humanitarian response inside Afghanistan is still desperately underfunded," said U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi, who called for a rapid increase in aid to sustain the country's internally displaced population.
As for the Afghans who "need to seek safety across the country's borders," Grandi said they "must be able to exercise their right to seek international protection, and borders must be kept open for them for this purpose." He urged wealthy countries to shoulder a greater share of responsibility.
"For four decades," said Grandi, "Pakistan and Iran have hosted millions of Afghan refugees. These two countries still host some 2.2 million registered Afghan refugees--almost 90% of the total."
"As we continue advocating for open borders," he added, "more countries must share this humanitarian responsibility," especially in light of the coronavirus pandemic's impact on Iran, which continues to suffer under the weight of U.S. sanctions.
Grandi stressed that "more resettlement options are sorely needed. They are critically important, not only to save lives but also as a demonstration of good will towards, and support for, those countries who have taken on most responsibility for the displaced."
The E.U. ministers' draft statement about migration from Afghanistan mentions learning from past "lessons," a reference to an influx of Syrian refugees in 2015 that, according to Reuters, "caught the bloc unprepared and sowed divisions among them, fueling support for far-right parties as camps in Greece, Italy, and elsewhere swelled."
Tobias Heidland, professor of economics at Kiel University, and Jasper Tjaden, professor of applied social research and public policy at the University of Potsdam, however, argued late last week in Politico that European politicians' fears of "causing 'another 2015' by signaling openness" are misplaced.
The pair of social scientists found in a recently published study that more lenient immigration policies in 2015 did not "create a significant and lasting pull effect." Current calls for more restrictive approaches, Heidland and Tjaden said, are based on concerns that have been greatly exaggerated.
"The present situation unfolding in Afghanistan reminds many of 2015," they wrote. "But looking back, it is clear that welcoming refugees does not necessarily mean attracting more in the long run, and fears of creating a pull effect by appearing welcoming under exceptional circumstances are overblown."
Grandi, meanwhile, emphasized the need to provide long-term support to Afghanistan's beleaguered population.
"The airlifts out of Kabul will end in a matter of days, and the tragedy that has unfolded will no longer be as visible," he said. "But it will still be a daily reality for millions of Afghans. We must not turn away."
"Standing by the people of Afghanistan means standing by all of them, whether they have sought safety abroad or are picking up the pieces of their lives at home," Grandi said. "Those who scrambled for a place on the evacuation flights out of Kabul airport are the same as those who may approach our borders in the next few weeks and months."
"We have shown sympathy and solidarity for Afghans over the past few days," he added. "Let us keep on doing so. This is the time for us to truly live up to the call for international cooperation as expressed in the 1951 Refugee Convention, as reaffirmed in the Global Compact on Refugees."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Human rights advocates are demanding that policymakers across Europe do more to safely accomodate Afghan refugees within their countries after it was revealed Monday that the European Union is reportedly planning to thwart the arrival of people fleeing the war-torn nation.
"Based on lessons learned, the E.U. and its member states stand determined to act jointly to prevent the recurrence of uncontrolled large-scale illegal migration movements faced in the past, by preparing a coordinated and orderly response," E.U. ministers are expected to say during a Tuesday meeting about Afghanistan, according to a draft statement obtained by Reuters.
"The E.U. should also strengthen the support to the countries in Afghanistan's immediate neighborhood to ensure that those in need receive adequate protection primarily in the region," officials are expected to add.
In response, Judith Sunderland, associate director of the Europe and Central Asia division at Human Rights Watch, said, "Let's hope someone tells them that refugee movements are not illegal."
Instead of throwing up more barriers or delegating responsibility to surrounding countries, Sunderland argued, European officials should develop "concrete plans for helping Afghans reach safety in the E.U."
Pointing to a recent Human Rights Watch statement encouraging European countries to "lead global efforts to urgently facilitate safe passage from Afghanistan of civilians at risk from the Taliban," Sunderland called for "meaningful resettlement pledges, expanded and facilitated family reunification, and humanitarian visas and visa waivers."
Referring to recent reporting about Poland's "grotesque" refusal to admit Afghan asylum seekers, Sunderland added that she "look[s] forward to a pledge that any Afghans who arrive at E.U. borders seeking asylum will not be turned away."
\u201cAlso, look forward to a pledge that any Afghans who arrive at EU borders seeking asylum will not be turned away. Poland\u2019s refusal to let a group of Afghan asylum seekers cross its border is grotesque 3/4 https://t.co/lW2LUQqLFe\u201d— Judith Sunderland (@Judith Sunderland) 1630323815
Nearly a month after leaving Afghanistan, a group of Afghan refugees is still "marooned on the border between Poland and Belarus in a 'Kafkaesque' political standoff," The Guardian reported Sunday. "The 32 refugees--women, men, and a child of 15 years old--have been stuck in a small, muddy patch of land between the two countries for almost three weeks with no access to clean water, insufficient shelter, and intermittent food supplies."
"Despite seeking international protection in Poland, they are not being allowed in, with border guards preventing them from entering," the British newspaper noted. "Neither are they being allowed back into Belarus, where they came from in the hope of being able to cross into the European Union."
Thousands of Afghans have been evacuated from Kabul since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan just over two weeks ago, but many vulnerable Afghans remain stranded throughout the country as NATO airlifts come to an end.
The United Nations' Refugee Agency (UNHCR) warned Monday that "a far greater humanitarian crisis is just beginning" for Afghanistan's 39 million residents.
"In the midst of a clear emergency, with millions in dire need of help, the humanitarian response inside Afghanistan is still desperately underfunded," said U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi, who called for a rapid increase in aid to sustain the country's internally displaced population.
As for the Afghans who "need to seek safety across the country's borders," Grandi said they "must be able to exercise their right to seek international protection, and borders must be kept open for them for this purpose." He urged wealthy countries to shoulder a greater share of responsibility.
"For four decades," said Grandi, "Pakistan and Iran have hosted millions of Afghan refugees. These two countries still host some 2.2 million registered Afghan refugees--almost 90% of the total."
"As we continue advocating for open borders," he added, "more countries must share this humanitarian responsibility," especially in light of the coronavirus pandemic's impact on Iran, which continues to suffer under the weight of U.S. sanctions.
Grandi stressed that "more resettlement options are sorely needed. They are critically important, not only to save lives but also as a demonstration of good will towards, and support for, those countries who have taken on most responsibility for the displaced."
The E.U. ministers' draft statement about migration from Afghanistan mentions learning from past "lessons," a reference to an influx of Syrian refugees in 2015 that, according to Reuters, "caught the bloc unprepared and sowed divisions among them, fueling support for far-right parties as camps in Greece, Italy, and elsewhere swelled."
Tobias Heidland, professor of economics at Kiel University, and Jasper Tjaden, professor of applied social research and public policy at the University of Potsdam, however, argued late last week in Politico that European politicians' fears of "causing 'another 2015' by signaling openness" are misplaced.
The pair of social scientists found in a recently published study that more lenient immigration policies in 2015 did not "create a significant and lasting pull effect." Current calls for more restrictive approaches, Heidland and Tjaden said, are based on concerns that have been greatly exaggerated.
"The present situation unfolding in Afghanistan reminds many of 2015," they wrote. "But looking back, it is clear that welcoming refugees does not necessarily mean attracting more in the long run, and fears of creating a pull effect by appearing welcoming under exceptional circumstances are overblown."
Grandi, meanwhile, emphasized the need to provide long-term support to Afghanistan's beleaguered population.
"The airlifts out of Kabul will end in a matter of days, and the tragedy that has unfolded will no longer be as visible," he said. "But it will still be a daily reality for millions of Afghans. We must not turn away."
"Standing by the people of Afghanistan means standing by all of them, whether they have sought safety abroad or are picking up the pieces of their lives at home," Grandi said. "Those who scrambled for a place on the evacuation flights out of Kabul airport are the same as those who may approach our borders in the next few weeks and months."
"We have shown sympathy and solidarity for Afghans over the past few days," he added. "Let us keep on doing so. This is the time for us to truly live up to the call for international cooperation as expressed in the 1951 Refugee Convention, as reaffirmed in the Global Compact on Refugees."
Human rights advocates are demanding that policymakers across Europe do more to safely accomodate Afghan refugees within their countries after it was revealed Monday that the European Union is reportedly planning to thwart the arrival of people fleeing the war-torn nation.
"Based on lessons learned, the E.U. and its member states stand determined to act jointly to prevent the recurrence of uncontrolled large-scale illegal migration movements faced in the past, by preparing a coordinated and orderly response," E.U. ministers are expected to say during a Tuesday meeting about Afghanistan, according to a draft statement obtained by Reuters.
"The E.U. should also strengthen the support to the countries in Afghanistan's immediate neighborhood to ensure that those in need receive adequate protection primarily in the region," officials are expected to add.
In response, Judith Sunderland, associate director of the Europe and Central Asia division at Human Rights Watch, said, "Let's hope someone tells them that refugee movements are not illegal."
Instead of throwing up more barriers or delegating responsibility to surrounding countries, Sunderland argued, European officials should develop "concrete plans for helping Afghans reach safety in the E.U."
Pointing to a recent Human Rights Watch statement encouraging European countries to "lead global efforts to urgently facilitate safe passage from Afghanistan of civilians at risk from the Taliban," Sunderland called for "meaningful resettlement pledges, expanded and facilitated family reunification, and humanitarian visas and visa waivers."
Referring to recent reporting about Poland's "grotesque" refusal to admit Afghan asylum seekers, Sunderland added that she "look[s] forward to a pledge that any Afghans who arrive at E.U. borders seeking asylum will not be turned away."
\u201cAlso, look forward to a pledge that any Afghans who arrive at EU borders seeking asylum will not be turned away. Poland\u2019s refusal to let a group of Afghan asylum seekers cross its border is grotesque 3/4 https://t.co/lW2LUQqLFe\u201d— Judith Sunderland (@Judith Sunderland) 1630323815
Nearly a month after leaving Afghanistan, a group of Afghan refugees is still "marooned on the border between Poland and Belarus in a 'Kafkaesque' political standoff," The Guardian reported Sunday. "The 32 refugees--women, men, and a child of 15 years old--have been stuck in a small, muddy patch of land between the two countries for almost three weeks with no access to clean water, insufficient shelter, and intermittent food supplies."
"Despite seeking international protection in Poland, they are not being allowed in, with border guards preventing them from entering," the British newspaper noted. "Neither are they being allowed back into Belarus, where they came from in the hope of being able to cross into the European Union."
Thousands of Afghans have been evacuated from Kabul since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan just over two weeks ago, but many vulnerable Afghans remain stranded throughout the country as NATO airlifts come to an end.
The United Nations' Refugee Agency (UNHCR) warned Monday that "a far greater humanitarian crisis is just beginning" for Afghanistan's 39 million residents.
"In the midst of a clear emergency, with millions in dire need of help, the humanitarian response inside Afghanistan is still desperately underfunded," said U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi, who called for a rapid increase in aid to sustain the country's internally displaced population.
As for the Afghans who "need to seek safety across the country's borders," Grandi said they "must be able to exercise their right to seek international protection, and borders must be kept open for them for this purpose." He urged wealthy countries to shoulder a greater share of responsibility.
"For four decades," said Grandi, "Pakistan and Iran have hosted millions of Afghan refugees. These two countries still host some 2.2 million registered Afghan refugees--almost 90% of the total."
"As we continue advocating for open borders," he added, "more countries must share this humanitarian responsibility," especially in light of the coronavirus pandemic's impact on Iran, which continues to suffer under the weight of U.S. sanctions.
Grandi stressed that "more resettlement options are sorely needed. They are critically important, not only to save lives but also as a demonstration of good will towards, and support for, those countries who have taken on most responsibility for the displaced."
The E.U. ministers' draft statement about migration from Afghanistan mentions learning from past "lessons," a reference to an influx of Syrian refugees in 2015 that, according to Reuters, "caught the bloc unprepared and sowed divisions among them, fueling support for far-right parties as camps in Greece, Italy, and elsewhere swelled."
Tobias Heidland, professor of economics at Kiel University, and Jasper Tjaden, professor of applied social research and public policy at the University of Potsdam, however, argued late last week in Politico that European politicians' fears of "causing 'another 2015' by signaling openness" are misplaced.
The pair of social scientists found in a recently published study that more lenient immigration policies in 2015 did not "create a significant and lasting pull effect." Current calls for more restrictive approaches, Heidland and Tjaden said, are based on concerns that have been greatly exaggerated.
"The present situation unfolding in Afghanistan reminds many of 2015," they wrote. "But looking back, it is clear that welcoming refugees does not necessarily mean attracting more in the long run, and fears of creating a pull effect by appearing welcoming under exceptional circumstances are overblown."
Grandi, meanwhile, emphasized the need to provide long-term support to Afghanistan's beleaguered population.
"The airlifts out of Kabul will end in a matter of days, and the tragedy that has unfolded will no longer be as visible," he said. "But it will still be a daily reality for millions of Afghans. We must not turn away."
"Standing by the people of Afghanistan means standing by all of them, whether they have sought safety abroad or are picking up the pieces of their lives at home," Grandi said. "Those who scrambled for a place on the evacuation flights out of Kabul airport are the same as those who may approach our borders in the next few weeks and months."
"We have shown sympathy and solidarity for Afghans over the past few days," he added. "Let us keep on doing so. This is the time for us to truly live up to the call for international cooperation as expressed in the 1951 Refugee Convention, as reaffirmed in the Global Compact on Refugees."
"We're in a knife fight for our democracy here in Indiana," said Democratic state lawmakers. "Trump is trying to bully the Indiana GOP into tearing apart our democracy."
Amid the specter of federal agents hunting down absconding Democratic state lawmakers resisting a Republican bid to gerrymander Texas' congressional map, U.S. Vice President JD Vance on Thursday traveled to Indiana, where his pitch for rigging that state's House districts was met with raucous opposition.
Vance met with Republican Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, who was reportedly "noncommittal" about redrawing the state's congressional map. In a Thursday interview on Fox News, Braun said that Indiana has "become more Republican over time, and these maps probably need to be looked at"—even as he admitted that a mid-decade redraw not linked to the decennial census would be "unusual."
Indiana Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith, a Republican, took to social media to thank Vance for his visit and voice support for redistricting.
"Redistricting isn't just politics—it's about ensuring the voice of We the People is heard loud and clear," Beckwith said. "Indiana is proud to play a key role in shaping a stronger, freer future for our nation and as lieutenant governor I fully support this effort!"
According to the Indianapolis Star, protestors organized by the nonprofit group MADVoters booed for more than a minute after learning that Vance was in the State House. Opponents of gerrymandering, led by Democratic state lawmakers, staged an hourslong sit-in protest.
"This is clearly a power grab," state Rep. Cherrish Pryor (D-94) told the Indiana Capital Chronicle. "This is simply an attempt by the president to stay in power forever."
Julia Vaughn, executive director of the advocacy group Common Cause Indiana, said Republicans should be prepared for a legal fight over any redistricting.
"We will see you in court, Gov. Braun," she said. "Leave our congressional maps alone!"
More than 100 demonstrators also rallied outside the Indiana Governor's Mansion to protest Republican gerrymandering machinations.
Via IndyStar:Close to 100 people have gathered outside of the Indiana Governor’s Mansion to protest the state government, who floated the idea of redistricting the state in favor of Republican candidates.Indiana GOP already hold 7 of the state's 9 US. House seats. #indianapolis #hoosiersky
[image or embed]
— Noe Padilla (@noepadilla.bsky.social) August 7, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Republicans already occupy seven of Indiana's nine House seats. Any redistricting would likely target the state's 1st District, which is represented by Congressman Frank Mrvan, a Democrat.
"The Trump administration has recognized that their harmful policies to benefit wealthy elites at the expense of working families are wildly unpopular. They know that their only hope to maintain control is to pressure the Indiana General Assembly to violate the Indiana Constitution and redistrict U.S. House of Representative seats mid-decade," Mrvan said in a statement.
"My mission throughout my career as a public servant and as a member of the U.S. House is to advocate for the most vulnerable in our communities," Mrvan added. "Any attempt to redistrict now is simply an attempt to silence those very voices."
Indiana's other Democratic congressman, André Carson of the 7th District, said: "Redistricting attempts in Indiana are a power grab. It's unethical and the move of a dictator."
"We won't accept our democracy turning into a dictatorship," Carson added. "Attempts to silence our vote exist right now. We want our Republican friends to do the right thing."
Democrats in the Indiana House of Representatives also issued a statement, saying that "we're in a knife fight for our democracy here in Indiana."
"We're getting the word out that President [Donald] Trump is trying to bully the Indiana GOP into tearing apart our democracy—but we're not letting this happen without a big, public fight," the Democrats added.
Responding to the vice president's gerrymandering pitch, Brett Edkins, managing director for policy and political affairs at the pro-democracy group Stand Up America, said in a statement that "Vance didn't visit Indiana for a friendly chat—he was there on marching orders from Donald Trump to strong-arm and intimidate state leaders into rigging the electoral maps in his favor so that congressional Republicans can avoid accountability from the voters in next year's midterm elections."
"Hoosiers deserve leaders who listen to them—not bullies from Washington, D.C. doing Trump's bidding behind closed doors," Edkins added. "Gov. Braun and Indiana's leaders should reject any effort to redraw Indiana's political maps for partisan ends."
Republicans are weighing plans for congressional redistricting in other states, including Florida, Missouri, and Ohio, ahead of next year's midterm elections. Governors and lawmakers in some Democrat-controlled states have vowed to respond in kind, with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul saying earlier this week that members of her party should "fight fire with fire."
Vance's Indiana visit came amid an escalating standoff between Texas Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in a bid to stymie a vote on a GOP-grerrymandered congressional map and Republican officials who ordered their arrest and enlisted the FBI to help track them down and force them back to Austin.
"Let's call this what it is: a clear attempt to rig federal elections and cheat the American people out of a voice," National Democratic Redistricting Committee president John Bisognano said Thursday of the GOP gerrymandering push in Indiana and other states.
"Republicans in the Hoosier State have a choice," he added. "They can stand up against the authoritarian regime in Washington and help stop this attempt to steal an election—just as Republicans in Georgia and Arizona did in 2020—or they can roll over to Donald Trump, sacrificing the rights and freedoms of all Americans, and see the wall of resistance Texas Republicans are seeing right now."
"Trans people have served this country with honor," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal. "They deserve dignity—not betrayal."
The families of transgender service members in the U.S. Air Force could lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in denied retirement benefits due to a memo sent by the military branch this week.
As Reuters reported Thursday, an official at the Air Force informed transgender members with 15-18 years of military service that they would no be eligible for early retirement and would instead be forced to leave the Air Force without retirement benefits. Some transgender troops had previously been told they could retire early.
"After careful consideration of the individual applications, I am disapproving all Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) exception to policy requests in Tabs 1 and 2 for members with 15-18 years of service," wrote Brian Scarlett, the acting assistant secretary of the Air Force for manpower and reserve affairs.
The memo means that many service members whose applications for early retirement had already been approved will have those approvals rescinded.
The decision follows the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in June that cleared the way for the U.S. Department of Defense to ban openly transgender Americans from serving in the military. President Donald Trump signed an executive order earlier this year to impose such a ban.
"This is just betrayal of a direct commitment made to these service members."
Last week, in a court filing related to transgender service members' lawsuit against the administration, the Department of Justice denied that the plaintiffs are transgender, instead calling them "trans-identifying individuals."
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said there would be "no more pronouns" and "no more dudes in dresses" permitted in the military at a press conference in May, and transgender service members have recently reported facing bigotry as they've departed the service.
Military.com reported last month that one 20-year transgender veteran of the Army was told by an instructor of a mandatory pre-retirement course that she and her classmates should cross out the words "pronoun, gender, diversity, and inclusion" from their workbooks.
The incident, she said, was "yet another reminder that it doesn't matter how much they say, 'Thank you for all the effort you put in and that your contributions are valuable'... because at the end of the day, they're having us manually go in and remove our own contributions from all the documentation."
The attempted "removal" of any record of transgender people's service now extends to their retirement benefits, according to the memo sent August 4, with service members who have served for close to two decades being given the option to quit or be forced out, with lump-sum payments instead of benefits.
Shannon Minter of the National Center for LGBTQ Rights told Reuters the memo was "devastating."
"This is just betrayal of a direct commitment made to these service members," said Minter.
Reuters reported that the memo included a question-and-answer section, with one question reading, "How do I tell family we're not getting retirement benefits?"
The Air Force suggested long-serving transgender members tell their loved ones to "focus on the benefits you do retain," such as Department of Veterans Affairs benefits and "experience," and to seek counseling services.
"The Air Force told transgender service members to prepare for early retirement—then changed course and is now forcing them out with no benefits at all," said U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). "Trans people have served this country with honor. They deserve dignity—not betrayal. We must speak out and fight back, always."
"The days of shackling America's oil, gas, and coal companies are over," said spokesperson Melinda McFossilShill.
A renaming ceremony for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was held at its Washington, D.C. headquarters on Thursday to give the EPA a name that reflects its priorities under Administrator Lee Zeldin and Republican President Donald Trump.
On the heels of Zeldin's visit to New England that spotlighted a push for the Constitution gas pipeline, a small group gathered outside the EPA building on Thursday to reintroduce it as the Environmental Pollution Agency and unveil its new logo.
"The days of shackling America's oil, gas, and coal companies are over," said Environmental Pollution Agency spokesperson Melinda McFossilShill. "The Trump administration stands for freedom, and that includes the freedom to pollute."
McFossilShill is not a real representative of the agency, but rather a critic of what it's become. Thursday's "Make Pollution Great Again!" event was a protest, led by groups including Shut Down D.C. and the local arm of Extinction Rebellion.
In addition to McFossilShill, protesters took on the personas of fossil fuel executives and backers, including Joe Gasfracker, vice president for corporate capture of government (a false name and position) at the (real) American Petroleum Institute.
"I want to extend my deepest gratitude to Administrator Zeldin and President Trump for finally ending the charade of so-called 'environmental protection' and making government work for our patriotic fossil fuel corporations again," he said.
"There are hundreds of people dying in floods, thousands dying in hurricanes, and millions being sickened by particulate matter pollution, wildfire smoke, and extreme heat, but we must balance that against the billions of dollars in profit that our members make," Gasfracker continued. "Billions are more than millions, so obviously our profits must take precedence."
Another protester—dubbed Pete Pollution, executive director of Energy Villains for Increased Leakage (EVIL)—declared that "the American Dream has always been about the freedom to pour toxic chemicals into every community."
"If we don't pollute America's environment, who will?" added Pollution. Other participants held signs that called for making rivers burn, causing more asthma, and destroying human health.
Protesters renamed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency the Environmental Pollution Agency at its Washington, D.C. headquarters on August 7, 2025. (Photo: Extinction Rebellion D.C.)
During Trump's second term, the EPA has faced intense criticism for a range of actions. Over the past month, the agency has put 144 employees on leave after they signed a letter criticizing the administration's "harmful" policies, eliminated its scientific research arm in the "ultimate Friday night purge," proposed reregistering a pesticide twice banned by federal courts, and moved to cancel $7 billion in solar grants for low- and middle-income households.
Perhaps most notably, the agency also unveiled a rule to rescind the 2009 "endangerment finding" that has enabled federal regulations aimed at the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency over the past 15 years.
Further, Trump last month signed a series of proclamations to provide what he called "regulatory relief" to over 100 coal, chemical manufacturing, iron ore processing, and sterile medical equipment facilities, with the White House claiming that rules imposed on them under former Democratic President Joe Biden's EPA were "burdensome."
At the time, John Walke, clean air director for the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, accused Trump of signing a "literal free pass for polluters," and warned that "if your family lives downwind of these plants, this is going to mean more toxic chemicals in the air you breathe."
Elected Democrats—who have minorities in both chambers of Congress—have joined climate, environmental, and public health advocates in calling out Trump and Zeldin for various moves.
Jay Inslee: Trump and Zeldin have turned EPA into ‘Environmental Pollution Agency’ by revoking essential climate rule www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/w...
[image or embed]
— Ali Velshi (@velshi.com) August 4, 2025 at 11:51 AM
On Thursday, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Environment and Public Works Committee Ranking Member Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) led a letter to Zeldin about his proposal to gut power plant pollution standards.
"Climate change and toxic air pollution are serious issues," dozens of Senate Democrats wrote to the EPA administrator. "We represent millions of constituents who risk poisoning from mercury and air toxics and who are facing the rising costs of the climate crisis."
"Congress established the Clean Air Act to protect our constituents from these dangers. We urge EPA to follow its directive," they added, urging Zeldin to withdraw two proposals on fossil fuel plant emissions.
In a Thursday statement, Schumer said that "the Trump administration is saying to hell with five decades worth of protection against deadly pollution and neurotoxins that has saved thousands of lives, made communities safer, and our economy stronger. Why? To appease Big Oil and fossil fuel billionaires."
"The Trump administration's obsession with gutting clean air protections and allowing more poison into the air is reckless, dangerous, and a clear reminder: Republicans care about their donors, not you," he charged. "The EPA needs to stop ignoring the science and the facts and immediately reverse course and put the health and safety of Americans first."