Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Corporate gatekeepers and big tech monopolists are making it more difficult than ever for independent media to survive. Please chip in today.

Wisconsin protesters demand that every vote is counted in the 2020 presidential election at a rally in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on November 7, 2020. (Photo by Daniel Boczarski/Getty Images for MoveOn)

Rallygoers deliver the “Count Every Vote” message in the wake of the presidential election results on November 07, 2020 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Photo by Daniel Boczarski/Getty Images for MoveOn)

'Unreasonable in the Extreme': Wisconsin Supreme Court Rejects Yet Another Trump Attempt to Undo Biden Victory

The state's high court dismissed the Trump campaign's challenge as "meritless on its face." 

Brett Wilkins

President Donald Trump's flailing effort to undo President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory suffered yet another body blow on Monday as the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected his campaign's legal challenge in the key battleground state.

Finding Trump's claim of over 220,000 unlawfully cast ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties—which Biden carried by margins of 52.6 and 39.9 points respectively—"meritless on its face," Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote (pdf) for the 4-3 majority that "striking these votes now—after the election, and in only two of Wisconsin's 72 counties when the disputed practices were followed by hundreds of thousands of absentee voters statewide—would be an extraordinary step for this court to take." 

"The [Trump] campaign's delay in raising these issues was unreasonable in the extreme, and the resulting prejudice to the election officials, other candidates, voters of the affected counties, and to voters statewide, is obvious and immense," Hagedorn wrote. The justice continued:  

Our laws allow the challenge flag to be thrown regarding various aspects of election administration. The challenges raised by the [Trump] campaign in this case, however, come long after the last play or even the last game; the campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began.

Election claims of this type must be brought expeditiously. The campaign waited until after the election to raise selective challenges that could have been raised long before the election. We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.

In her dissent, Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack sided with Trump and asserted that "it is critical that the public perceive that the election was fairly conducted."

However, Roggensack did not address the reasons why millions of Americans believe the election was "rigged" or "stolen," which include incessant lies and disinformation from not only right-wing media and pundits but from prominent Republicans including the president himself.

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports Monday's loss was the fourth time in the past two weeks that the state justices ruled against the president's campaign, which spent $3 millon on a recount in Dane and Milwaukee counties that ended with Biden enjoying an even larger lead than before. 

Trump has now lost all but one of his 60 legal challenges in his increasingly desperate bid to reverse the will of the American people—over seven million more of whom voted for Biden than for him. Biden also won the Electoral College by 74 votes, 306-232. Trump, who defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by the exact same Electoral College score in 2016, called his own margin of victory a "landslide" at the time. 

The president's latest defeat came as members of the Electoral College were meeting or preparing to meet Monday in state capitals nationwide to cast their ballots to officially elect Joe Biden as the 46th president of the United States. 

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'This Is a War' for Democratic Party's Future, Says Sanders of AIPAC's Super PAC

"They are doing everything they can to destroy the progressive movement in this country," said the senator.

Julia Conley ·

WHO to Convene Emergency Meeting on Monkeypox Outbreak

Leading public health experts plan to discuss the ongoing outbreak as the number of confirmed cases in the U.K. more than doubled on Friday to 20.

Kenny Stancil ·

Nearly 90,000 Small Businesses in US Expected to Close After Senate GOP Kills Main Street Relief Bill

"The fate of these small businesses," said one advocacy group, "will be tied to those senators who voted down this lifeline today."

Julia Conley ·

To 'Have Our Own Media' Is Key to Political Power, Orbán Tells US Right-Wingers

Hungary's strongman prime minister gave the recommendations at CPAC's first-ever gathering in Europe.

Andrea Germanos ·

Documents Show Baby Formula Maker Enriched Shareholders Amid Deadly Bacteria Outbreak

"Abbott chose to prioritize shareholders by issuing billions of dollars in stock buybacks instead of making productive investments," said one economist.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo