Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) talks with reporters following the weekly Senate Republican Policy Committee luncheon in the U.S. Capitol November 28, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Nov 02, 2020
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was projected as the likely winner by major news outlets Tuesday night, as he thwarted--surprising almost nobody--Democratic challenger Amy McGrath, a former U.S. Marine who ran a centrist campaign.
The victory for McConnell means the reviled architect of President Donald Trump's takeover of the nation's judiciary--and the lawmaker in Washington, D.C. most responsible for tanking congressional efforts to achieve much-needed Covid-19 relief in recent months even as the nation suffers under severe economic pain--is headed back to the U.S. Senate for another term.
The race was called by the Associated Press and NBC News just before 8:30 pm ET. As of this writing, based on returns provided by AP and with an estimated 71% votes reported, McConnell had won 57.5% (955,512) compared to McGrath's 38.6% (641,027).
\u201cJUST IN: Sen. Mitch McConnell makes speech after being projected winner of Kentucky Senate race: "Kentucky, I'm humbled and grateful that you've rehired me to keep fighting for your families and serving our commonwealth for the next six years." https://t.co/gJroncYin9\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1604454497
Critics of McConnell were quick to note that even though he has retained his seat, there is still hope that wins in a number of key Senate races by Democrats on Tuesday would strip him of his coveted majority position.
\u201cMitch McConnell has held on to his Kentucky Senate seat. But that does not mean that he will hold on to his gig as Senate Majority Leader. Democrats have several routes by which they could take the Senate tonight.\n\nhttps://t.co/qW3Ini6zs9\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1604454140
With a current 52 to 48 split in the Senate, Democrats need to pick up at least 4 seats to recapture the majority. As Voxreported earlier on Tuesday, the idea that Democrats would win enough seats to obtain a 60-seat supermajority is unlikely.
McGrath was backed by huge amounts of money, but it wasn't enough.
\u201cAmy McGrath spent nearly $100 million and outspent Mitch McConnell by $30 million, but the Kentucky Republican and Senate GOP Leader cruises to re-election for his 7th term.\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1604452213
\u201cAnd Amy McGrath one of his weakest challengers, too (despite the $$).\u201d— Josh Kraushaar (@Josh Kraushaar) 1604453079
Progressives, meanwhile, on Tuesday noted how establishment Democrats--including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)--had backed McGrath in the primary over Charles Booker, who only narrowly lost that contest even as he ran an insurgent campaign in support of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, increasing the minimum wage, and other visionary policies.
"They spent $40 million+ to get her across the finish line against Booker," tweetedThe American Prospect's Alex Sammon of the DSCC effort in the primary. "They could've just stayed out of it and let the best candidate win, and put that money towards beating McConnell."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was projected as the likely winner by major news outlets Tuesday night, as he thwarted--surprising almost nobody--Democratic challenger Amy McGrath, a former U.S. Marine who ran a centrist campaign.
The victory for McConnell means the reviled architect of President Donald Trump's takeover of the nation's judiciary--and the lawmaker in Washington, D.C. most responsible for tanking congressional efforts to achieve much-needed Covid-19 relief in recent months even as the nation suffers under severe economic pain--is headed back to the U.S. Senate for another term.
The race was called by the Associated Press and NBC News just before 8:30 pm ET. As of this writing, based on returns provided by AP and with an estimated 71% votes reported, McConnell had won 57.5% (955,512) compared to McGrath's 38.6% (641,027).
\u201cJUST IN: Sen. Mitch McConnell makes speech after being projected winner of Kentucky Senate race: "Kentucky, I'm humbled and grateful that you've rehired me to keep fighting for your families and serving our commonwealth for the next six years." https://t.co/gJroncYin9\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1604454497
Critics of McConnell were quick to note that even though he has retained his seat, there is still hope that wins in a number of key Senate races by Democrats on Tuesday would strip him of his coveted majority position.
\u201cMitch McConnell has held on to his Kentucky Senate seat. But that does not mean that he will hold on to his gig as Senate Majority Leader. Democrats have several routes by which they could take the Senate tonight.\n\nhttps://t.co/qW3Ini6zs9\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1604454140
With a current 52 to 48 split in the Senate, Democrats need to pick up at least 4 seats to recapture the majority. As Voxreported earlier on Tuesday, the idea that Democrats would win enough seats to obtain a 60-seat supermajority is unlikely.
McGrath was backed by huge amounts of money, but it wasn't enough.
\u201cAmy McGrath spent nearly $100 million and outspent Mitch McConnell by $30 million, but the Kentucky Republican and Senate GOP Leader cruises to re-election for his 7th term.\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1604452213
\u201cAnd Amy McGrath one of his weakest challengers, too (despite the $$).\u201d— Josh Kraushaar (@Josh Kraushaar) 1604453079
Progressives, meanwhile, on Tuesday noted how establishment Democrats--including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)--had backed McGrath in the primary over Charles Booker, who only narrowly lost that contest even as he ran an insurgent campaign in support of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, increasing the minimum wage, and other visionary policies.
"They spent $40 million+ to get her across the finish line against Booker," tweetedThe American Prospect's Alex Sammon of the DSCC effort in the primary. "They could've just stayed out of it and let the best candidate win, and put that money towards beating McConnell."
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was projected as the likely winner by major news outlets Tuesday night, as he thwarted--surprising almost nobody--Democratic challenger Amy McGrath, a former U.S. Marine who ran a centrist campaign.
The victory for McConnell means the reviled architect of President Donald Trump's takeover of the nation's judiciary--and the lawmaker in Washington, D.C. most responsible for tanking congressional efforts to achieve much-needed Covid-19 relief in recent months even as the nation suffers under severe economic pain--is headed back to the U.S. Senate for another term.
The race was called by the Associated Press and NBC News just before 8:30 pm ET. As of this writing, based on returns provided by AP and with an estimated 71% votes reported, McConnell had won 57.5% (955,512) compared to McGrath's 38.6% (641,027).
\u201cJUST IN: Sen. Mitch McConnell makes speech after being projected winner of Kentucky Senate race: "Kentucky, I'm humbled and grateful that you've rehired me to keep fighting for your families and serving our commonwealth for the next six years." https://t.co/gJroncYin9\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1604454497
Critics of McConnell were quick to note that even though he has retained his seat, there is still hope that wins in a number of key Senate races by Democrats on Tuesday would strip him of his coveted majority position.
\u201cMitch McConnell has held on to his Kentucky Senate seat. But that does not mean that he will hold on to his gig as Senate Majority Leader. Democrats have several routes by which they could take the Senate tonight.\n\nhttps://t.co/qW3Ini6zs9\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1604454140
With a current 52 to 48 split in the Senate, Democrats need to pick up at least 4 seats to recapture the majority. As Voxreported earlier on Tuesday, the idea that Democrats would win enough seats to obtain a 60-seat supermajority is unlikely.
McGrath was backed by huge amounts of money, but it wasn't enough.
\u201cAmy McGrath spent nearly $100 million and outspent Mitch McConnell by $30 million, but the Kentucky Republican and Senate GOP Leader cruises to re-election for his 7th term.\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1604452213
\u201cAnd Amy McGrath one of his weakest challengers, too (despite the $$).\u201d— Josh Kraushaar (@Josh Kraushaar) 1604453079
Progressives, meanwhile, on Tuesday noted how establishment Democrats--including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)--had backed McGrath in the primary over Charles Booker, who only narrowly lost that contest even as he ran an insurgent campaign in support of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, increasing the minimum wage, and other visionary policies.
"They spent $40 million+ to get her across the finish line against Booker," tweetedThe American Prospect's Alex Sammon of the DSCC effort in the primary. "They could've just stayed out of it and let the best candidate win, and put that money towards beating McConnell."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.