SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) talks with reporters following the weekly Senate Republican Policy Committee luncheon in the U.S. Capitol November 28, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
McConnell Headed Back to US Senate, But Will Reviled Republican Remain Majority Leader?
The Kentucky Republican fends off challenge from centrist Democrat Amy McGrath.
Nov 02, 2020
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was projected as the likely winner by major news outlets Tuesday night, as he thwarted--surprising almost nobody--Democratic challenger Amy McGrath, a former U.S. Marine who ran a centrist campaign.
The victory for McConnell means the reviled architect of President Donald Trump's takeover of the nation's judiciary--and the lawmaker in Washington, D.C. most responsible for tanking congressional efforts to achieve much-needed Covid-19 relief in recent months even as the nation suffers under severe economic pain--is headed back to the U.S. Senate for another term.
The race was called by the Associated Press and NBC News just before 8:30 pm ET. As of this writing, based on returns provided by AP and with an estimated 71% votes reported, McConnell had won 57.5% (955,512) compared to McGrath's 38.6% (641,027).
Critics of McConnell were quick to note that even though he has retained his seat, there is still hope that wins in a number of key Senate races by Democrats on Tuesday would strip him of his coveted majority position.
With a current 52 to 48 split in the Senate, Democrats need to pick up at least 4 seats to recapture the majority. As Vox reported earlier on Tuesday, the idea that Democrats would win enough seats to obtain a 60-seat supermajority is unlikely.
McGrath was backed by huge amounts of money, but it wasn't enough.
Progressives, meanwhile, on Tuesday noted how establishment Democrats--including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)--had backed McGrath in the primary over Charles Booker, who only narrowly lost that contest even as he ran an insurgent campaign in support of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, increasing the minimum wage, and other visionary policies.
"They spent $40 million+ to get her across the finish line against Booker," tweeted The American Prospect's Alex Sammon of the DSCC effort in the primary. "They could've just stayed out of it and let the best candidate win, and put that money towards beating McConnell."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was projected as the likely winner by major news outlets Tuesday night, as he thwarted--surprising almost nobody--Democratic challenger Amy McGrath, a former U.S. Marine who ran a centrist campaign.
The victory for McConnell means the reviled architect of President Donald Trump's takeover of the nation's judiciary--and the lawmaker in Washington, D.C. most responsible for tanking congressional efforts to achieve much-needed Covid-19 relief in recent months even as the nation suffers under severe economic pain--is headed back to the U.S. Senate for another term.
The race was called by the Associated Press and NBC News just before 8:30 pm ET. As of this writing, based on returns provided by AP and with an estimated 71% votes reported, McConnell had won 57.5% (955,512) compared to McGrath's 38.6% (641,027).
Critics of McConnell were quick to note that even though he has retained his seat, there is still hope that wins in a number of key Senate races by Democrats on Tuesday would strip him of his coveted majority position.
With a current 52 to 48 split in the Senate, Democrats need to pick up at least 4 seats to recapture the majority. As Vox reported earlier on Tuesday, the idea that Democrats would win enough seats to obtain a 60-seat supermajority is unlikely.
McGrath was backed by huge amounts of money, but it wasn't enough.
Progressives, meanwhile, on Tuesday noted how establishment Democrats--including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)--had backed McGrath in the primary over Charles Booker, who only narrowly lost that contest even as he ran an insurgent campaign in support of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, increasing the minimum wage, and other visionary policies.
"They spent $40 million+ to get her across the finish line against Booker," tweeted The American Prospect's Alex Sammon of the DSCC effort in the primary. "They could've just stayed out of it and let the best candidate win, and put that money towards beating McConnell."
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was projected as the likely winner by major news outlets Tuesday night, as he thwarted--surprising almost nobody--Democratic challenger Amy McGrath, a former U.S. Marine who ran a centrist campaign.
The victory for McConnell means the reviled architect of President Donald Trump's takeover of the nation's judiciary--and the lawmaker in Washington, D.C. most responsible for tanking congressional efforts to achieve much-needed Covid-19 relief in recent months even as the nation suffers under severe economic pain--is headed back to the U.S. Senate for another term.
The race was called by the Associated Press and NBC News just before 8:30 pm ET. As of this writing, based on returns provided by AP and with an estimated 71% votes reported, McConnell had won 57.5% (955,512) compared to McGrath's 38.6% (641,027).
Critics of McConnell were quick to note that even though he has retained his seat, there is still hope that wins in a number of key Senate races by Democrats on Tuesday would strip him of his coveted majority position.
With a current 52 to 48 split in the Senate, Democrats need to pick up at least 4 seats to recapture the majority. As Vox reported earlier on Tuesday, the idea that Democrats would win enough seats to obtain a 60-seat supermajority is unlikely.
McGrath was backed by huge amounts of money, but it wasn't enough.
Progressives, meanwhile, on Tuesday noted how establishment Democrats--including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)--had backed McGrath in the primary over Charles Booker, who only narrowly lost that contest even as he ran an insurgent campaign in support of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, increasing the minimum wage, and other visionary policies.
"They spent $40 million+ to get her across the finish line against Booker," tweeted The American Prospect's Alex Sammon of the DSCC effort in the primary. "They could've just stayed out of it and let the best candidate win, and put that money towards beating McConnell."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.