SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Protesters rally demanding economic relief during the coronavirus pandemic, at Time Square on August 5, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)
#SaveThe600 Coalition Slams Trump Executive Action as 'False Promise' to Laid-Off Workers and Desperate Families
"It is likely illegal, unworkable, won't get money to anyone quickly or for long, and is deeply inequitable."
Aug 11, 2020
Condemning President Donald Trump's unemployment insurance directive as a "false promise" to millions of laid-off workers that "won't get money to anyone quickly or for long," a coalition of nearly two dozen progressive advocacy organizations demanded Monday that the White House and Republicans immediately return to the negotiating table and revive the lapsed $600-per-week federal benefit increase.
The #SaveThe600 coalition warned in a statement that Trump's unemployment insurance (UI) memorandum--which proposes using $44 billion in disaster relief funds to increase UI benefits by $400 per week, with cash-strapped states kicking in 25% of the cost--"won't get relief to desperate families." As Common Dreams reported, the directive intentionally excludes many poor Americans by limiting relief to people currently receiving "at least $100 per week" in state unemployment benefits.
"The memorandum doesn't solve the problems people are facing. We need real action now, not political stunts."
--#SaveThe600 Coalition
"States must now scramble to set up new benefit systems to pay an inadequate and short-lived benefit, at the worst possible moment," the coalition said. "Millions of workers suffering large income losses have waited weeks or months to receive their first UI payments, and many face unfair denials due to overzealous scrutiny of claims. Further burdening UI agencies is inexcusable when millions of people remain in limbo."
"Indeed, it looks as if states will need to set up entirely new mechanisms to deliver these funds, which could take weeks or months to do," the coalition added. "Many states simply will not invest in distributing this benefit."
The groups' statement came as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin claimed Monday that the new unemployment benefits will be going out in most states "within the next week or two"--a timeline that experts met with deep skepticism.
"They think they will be able to get the new funds to the unemployed up and running in two weeks? I'm at a complete loss for words," tweeted Michele Evermore, a senior policy analyst with the National Employment Law Project.
Ernie Tedeschi, a former Treasury Department economist, said that "even if the legal and logistical ambiguities are resolved for federal officials in two weeks," it is "easy to imagine there still being hitches and challenges as states try to implement this significantly-different UI program on the ground."
Trump's executive action on unemployment benefits and other matters came after the White House and Democratic negotiators failed to reach an agreement last week on a broad coronavirus relief package. Unemployment insurance was one of the major sticking points during the negotiations; Democrats proposed extending the $600-per-week payments through January of next year and the White House countered with $400, an $800 monthly reduction in benefits.
The #SaveThe600 coalition accused the White House and congressional Republicans of engaging in "cruel gamesmanship" and urged Congress to swiftly "pass a package that is robust and comprehensive enough to match this unprecedented crisis."
"The memorandum doesn't solve the problems people are facing," the coalition said. "Millions of children live in households without enough to eat or that are behind on rent. State and local governments are facing deep budget cuts with lasting consequences for their residents, especially women. Immigrant families need relief. We need real action now, not political stunts."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Condemning President Donald Trump's unemployment insurance directive as a "false promise" to millions of laid-off workers that "won't get money to anyone quickly or for long," a coalition of nearly two dozen progressive advocacy organizations demanded Monday that the White House and Republicans immediately return to the negotiating table and revive the lapsed $600-per-week federal benefit increase.
The #SaveThe600 coalition warned in a statement that Trump's unemployment insurance (UI) memorandum--which proposes using $44 billion in disaster relief funds to increase UI benefits by $400 per week, with cash-strapped states kicking in 25% of the cost--"won't get relief to desperate families." As Common Dreams reported, the directive intentionally excludes many poor Americans by limiting relief to people currently receiving "at least $100 per week" in state unemployment benefits.
"The memorandum doesn't solve the problems people are facing. We need real action now, not political stunts."
--#SaveThe600 Coalition
"States must now scramble to set up new benefit systems to pay an inadequate and short-lived benefit, at the worst possible moment," the coalition said. "Millions of workers suffering large income losses have waited weeks or months to receive their first UI payments, and many face unfair denials due to overzealous scrutiny of claims. Further burdening UI agencies is inexcusable when millions of people remain in limbo."
"Indeed, it looks as if states will need to set up entirely new mechanisms to deliver these funds, which could take weeks or months to do," the coalition added. "Many states simply will not invest in distributing this benefit."
The groups' statement came as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin claimed Monday that the new unemployment benefits will be going out in most states "within the next week or two"--a timeline that experts met with deep skepticism.
"They think they will be able to get the new funds to the unemployed up and running in two weeks? I'm at a complete loss for words," tweeted Michele Evermore, a senior policy analyst with the National Employment Law Project.
Ernie Tedeschi, a former Treasury Department economist, said that "even if the legal and logistical ambiguities are resolved for federal officials in two weeks," it is "easy to imagine there still being hitches and challenges as states try to implement this significantly-different UI program on the ground."
Trump's executive action on unemployment benefits and other matters came after the White House and Democratic negotiators failed to reach an agreement last week on a broad coronavirus relief package. Unemployment insurance was one of the major sticking points during the negotiations; Democrats proposed extending the $600-per-week payments through January of next year and the White House countered with $400, an $800 monthly reduction in benefits.
The #SaveThe600 coalition accused the White House and congressional Republicans of engaging in "cruel gamesmanship" and urged Congress to swiftly "pass a package that is robust and comprehensive enough to match this unprecedented crisis."
"The memorandum doesn't solve the problems people are facing," the coalition said. "Millions of children live in households without enough to eat or that are behind on rent. State and local governments are facing deep budget cuts with lasting consequences for their residents, especially women. Immigrant families need relief. We need real action now, not political stunts."
Condemning President Donald Trump's unemployment insurance directive as a "false promise" to millions of laid-off workers that "won't get money to anyone quickly or for long," a coalition of nearly two dozen progressive advocacy organizations demanded Monday that the White House and Republicans immediately return to the negotiating table and revive the lapsed $600-per-week federal benefit increase.
The #SaveThe600 coalition warned in a statement that Trump's unemployment insurance (UI) memorandum--which proposes using $44 billion in disaster relief funds to increase UI benefits by $400 per week, with cash-strapped states kicking in 25% of the cost--"won't get relief to desperate families." As Common Dreams reported, the directive intentionally excludes many poor Americans by limiting relief to people currently receiving "at least $100 per week" in state unemployment benefits.
"The memorandum doesn't solve the problems people are facing. We need real action now, not political stunts."
--#SaveThe600 Coalition
"States must now scramble to set up new benefit systems to pay an inadequate and short-lived benefit, at the worst possible moment," the coalition said. "Millions of workers suffering large income losses have waited weeks or months to receive their first UI payments, and many face unfair denials due to overzealous scrutiny of claims. Further burdening UI agencies is inexcusable when millions of people remain in limbo."
"Indeed, it looks as if states will need to set up entirely new mechanisms to deliver these funds, which could take weeks or months to do," the coalition added. "Many states simply will not invest in distributing this benefit."
The groups' statement came as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin claimed Monday that the new unemployment benefits will be going out in most states "within the next week or two"--a timeline that experts met with deep skepticism.
"They think they will be able to get the new funds to the unemployed up and running in two weeks? I'm at a complete loss for words," tweeted Michele Evermore, a senior policy analyst with the National Employment Law Project.
Ernie Tedeschi, a former Treasury Department economist, said that "even if the legal and logistical ambiguities are resolved for federal officials in two weeks," it is "easy to imagine there still being hitches and challenges as states try to implement this significantly-different UI program on the ground."
Trump's executive action on unemployment benefits and other matters came after the White House and Democratic negotiators failed to reach an agreement last week on a broad coronavirus relief package. Unemployment insurance was one of the major sticking points during the negotiations; Democrats proposed extending the $600-per-week payments through January of next year and the White House countered with $400, an $800 monthly reduction in benefits.
The #SaveThe600 coalition accused the White House and congressional Republicans of engaging in "cruel gamesmanship" and urged Congress to swiftly "pass a package that is robust and comprehensive enough to match this unprecedented crisis."
"The memorandum doesn't solve the problems people are facing," the coalition said. "Millions of children live in households without enough to eat or that are behind on rent. State and local governments are facing deep budget cuts with lasting consequences for their residents, especially women. Immigrant families need relief. We need real action now, not political stunts."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.