To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
A girl holds on to an adult as police in riot gear stand nearby following protests against the death of George Floyd, a black man who died May 25 in the custody of Minneapolis Police, turned destructive in Seattle, Washington on May 30, 2020. (Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)
Journalists and civil liberties advocates alike condemned a ruling Thursday by a county judge in Seattle, Washington instructing a number of city media outlets to give police photographs and video footage taken during a May 30 Black Lives Matter demonstration against police brutality.
"This turns journalists into an arm of the government," tweeted journalist Matt Pearce. "We are not here to do surveillance for police."
\u201cThis is a horrible precedent that erodes hard working visual journalists\u2019 credibility with protesters and makes their job even more dangerous. cc @NPPA @nppalawyer\u201d— Matt M. McKnight (@Matt M. McKnight) 1595555285
The "extremely troubling" ruling applies to the Seattle Times and local stations KIRO, KOMO, KING, and KCPQ. The five outlets were subpoenaed by the Seattle Police Department for a 90-minute span of footage that shows demonstrators police say were responsible for property destruction and the theft of some guns during the protest.
"This ruling is disturbing--and dangerous," the paper's Metro editor Benjamin Woodard said on Twitter. "Our newsroom does not work in concert with law enforcement."
Times executive editor Michele Matassa Flores told her paper that the ruling "puts our independence, and even our staff's physical safety, at risk."
\u201cWe @seattletimes strongly oppose this move by @SeattlePD and this ruling by a King County judge. As I'm quoted as saying in this story, we don\u2019t work in concert with government, and it\u2019s important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain independence from those we cover.\u201d— Michele M. Flores (@Michele M. Flores) 1595564130
"The media exist in large part to hold governments, including law enforcement agencies, accountable to the public," Matassa Flores said. "We don't work in concert with government, and it's important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain our independence from those we cover."
In his ruling, King County Superior Court Judge Nelson Lee rejected the outlets' argument that the content was protected by Washington state's shield law.
According to the Times:
Lee ruled that the SPD had met its burden to overcome the shield law: that the images were "highly material and relevant" and "critical or necessary" to prove an issue that has a compelling public interest for its disclosure. Getting the stolen weapons off the street was one compelling public interest, Lee found.
"This should alarm readers and viewers," tweetedCNN national correspondent Ed Lavandera. "Journalists must be allowed to work independently!"
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Journalists and civil liberties advocates alike condemned a ruling Thursday by a county judge in Seattle, Washington instructing a number of city media outlets to give police photographs and video footage taken during a May 30 Black Lives Matter demonstration against police brutality.
"This turns journalists into an arm of the government," tweeted journalist Matt Pearce. "We are not here to do surveillance for police."
\u201cThis is a horrible precedent that erodes hard working visual journalists\u2019 credibility with protesters and makes their job even more dangerous. cc @NPPA @nppalawyer\u201d— Matt M. McKnight (@Matt M. McKnight) 1595555285
The "extremely troubling" ruling applies to the Seattle Times and local stations KIRO, KOMO, KING, and KCPQ. The five outlets were subpoenaed by the Seattle Police Department for a 90-minute span of footage that shows demonstrators police say were responsible for property destruction and the theft of some guns during the protest.
"This ruling is disturbing--and dangerous," the paper's Metro editor Benjamin Woodard said on Twitter. "Our newsroom does not work in concert with law enforcement."
Times executive editor Michele Matassa Flores told her paper that the ruling "puts our independence, and even our staff's physical safety, at risk."
\u201cWe @seattletimes strongly oppose this move by @SeattlePD and this ruling by a King County judge. As I'm quoted as saying in this story, we don\u2019t work in concert with government, and it\u2019s important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain independence from those we cover.\u201d— Michele M. Flores (@Michele M. Flores) 1595564130
"The media exist in large part to hold governments, including law enforcement agencies, accountable to the public," Matassa Flores said. "We don't work in concert with government, and it's important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain our independence from those we cover."
In his ruling, King County Superior Court Judge Nelson Lee rejected the outlets' argument that the content was protected by Washington state's shield law.
According to the Times:
Lee ruled that the SPD had met its burden to overcome the shield law: that the images were "highly material and relevant" and "critical or necessary" to prove an issue that has a compelling public interest for its disclosure. Getting the stolen weapons off the street was one compelling public interest, Lee found.
"This should alarm readers and viewers," tweetedCNN national correspondent Ed Lavandera. "Journalists must be allowed to work independently!"
Journalists and civil liberties advocates alike condemned a ruling Thursday by a county judge in Seattle, Washington instructing a number of city media outlets to give police photographs and video footage taken during a May 30 Black Lives Matter demonstration against police brutality.
"This turns journalists into an arm of the government," tweeted journalist Matt Pearce. "We are not here to do surveillance for police."
\u201cThis is a horrible precedent that erodes hard working visual journalists\u2019 credibility with protesters and makes their job even more dangerous. cc @NPPA @nppalawyer\u201d— Matt M. McKnight (@Matt M. McKnight) 1595555285
The "extremely troubling" ruling applies to the Seattle Times and local stations KIRO, KOMO, KING, and KCPQ. The five outlets were subpoenaed by the Seattle Police Department for a 90-minute span of footage that shows demonstrators police say were responsible for property destruction and the theft of some guns during the protest.
"This ruling is disturbing--and dangerous," the paper's Metro editor Benjamin Woodard said on Twitter. "Our newsroom does not work in concert with law enforcement."
Times executive editor Michele Matassa Flores told her paper that the ruling "puts our independence, and even our staff's physical safety, at risk."
\u201cWe @seattletimes strongly oppose this move by @SeattlePD and this ruling by a King County judge. As I'm quoted as saying in this story, we don\u2019t work in concert with government, and it\u2019s important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain independence from those we cover.\u201d— Michele M. Flores (@Michele M. Flores) 1595564130
"The media exist in large part to hold governments, including law enforcement agencies, accountable to the public," Matassa Flores said. "We don't work in concert with government, and it's important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain our independence from those we cover."
In his ruling, King County Superior Court Judge Nelson Lee rejected the outlets' argument that the content was protected by Washington state's shield law.
According to the Times:
Lee ruled that the SPD had met its burden to overcome the shield law: that the images were "highly material and relevant" and "critical or necessary" to prove an issue that has a compelling public interest for its disclosure. Getting the stolen weapons off the street was one compelling public interest, Lee found.
"This should alarm readers and viewers," tweetedCNN national correspondent Ed Lavandera. "Journalists must be allowed to work independently!"