SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Trump administration attempted to employ a never-before-used provision of the USA PATRIOT Act to indefinitely detain Adham Hassoun, who has been released to an undisclosed country. (Photo: mlliu/flickr/cc)
ACLU Says Release of Adham Hassoun Confirms US Government Lacks Power to 'Lock Someone Up Without Due Process'
"The government's claim that it could imprison Mr. Hassoun indefinitely without any court looking into the facts is both deeply authoritarian and fundamentally unconstitutional."
Jul 22, 2020
The ACLU announced on Wednesday that the legal group's client Adham Hassoun was released to an undisclosed country under a confidential court agreement after being detained by the Trump administration for over 17 months without charge or trial under a never-before-used provision of the USA PATRIOT Act.
"That the government was able to hold Mr. Hassoun for over 17 months without charge or trial, on the basis of false allegations that the government itself refused to defend in court, is chilling."
--Jonathan Hafetz, ACLU
"Mr. Hassoun was the first person to be unlawfully detained under the PATRIOT Act. This court victory makes clear he should be the last," ACLU senior staff attorney Jonathan Hafetz said in a statement.
"Our client's freedom is a victory for the rule of law, and reaffirms that the government does not have unreviewable powers to lock someone up without due process," said Hafetz. "But this entire case has been a travesty, as well as an abuse of a power that the government never should have had in the first place."
"That the government was able to hold Mr. Hassoun for over 17 months without charge or trial, on the basis of false allegations that the government itself refused to defend in court," he added, "is chilling."
Late last month, in response to a challenge filed by the ACLU, the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, and the Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center, Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford of the Western District of New York had ordered the U.S. government to release Hassoun, a Palestinian born in Lebanon who moved to the United States in 1989.
The Trump administration had tried to indefinitely detain Hassoun--claiming without evidence that he is a threat to national security--since he was transferred to immigration custody in 2017 after completing a 15-year sentence for providing material support to terrorist activities. Hassoun's sentence, which his attorneys have said was based on questionable allegations, followed years of FBI surveillance.
The government asked two appellate courts to keep Hassoun locked up following Wolford's order, but those requests "are now moot due to Hassoun's release to a foreign country," according to the ACLU. "However, Hassoun's motion for sanctions against the government for hiding and destroying evidence of his innocence remains pending before the district court."
Jonathan Manes of the MacArthur Justice Center at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law said Wednesday that "Mr. Hassoun has finally regained his freedom years after completing his criminal sentence, but every day of his detention under the PATRIOT Act has been an injustice."
"Mr. Hassoun was detained for 17 months based on lies from jailhouse informants desperate to avoid deportation," Manes continued. "The government's claim that it could imprison Mr. Hassoun indefinitely without any court looking into the facts is both deeply authoritarian and fundamentally unconstitutional."
"This case," he declared, "shows exactly why the government cannot have the power to lock people up unilaterally, without a fair trial, in the name of national security."
Nicole Hallett, one of Hassoun's attorneys and director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, concurred.
"Mr. Hassoun's case," she said, "shows precisely why the government should not have the authority to indefinitely detain anyone without robust judicial review."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The ACLU announced on Wednesday that the legal group's client Adham Hassoun was released to an undisclosed country under a confidential court agreement after being detained by the Trump administration for over 17 months without charge or trial under a never-before-used provision of the USA PATRIOT Act.
"That the government was able to hold Mr. Hassoun for over 17 months without charge or trial, on the basis of false allegations that the government itself refused to defend in court, is chilling."
--Jonathan Hafetz, ACLU
"Mr. Hassoun was the first person to be unlawfully detained under the PATRIOT Act. This court victory makes clear he should be the last," ACLU senior staff attorney Jonathan Hafetz said in a statement.
"Our client's freedom is a victory for the rule of law, and reaffirms that the government does not have unreviewable powers to lock someone up without due process," said Hafetz. "But this entire case has been a travesty, as well as an abuse of a power that the government never should have had in the first place."
"That the government was able to hold Mr. Hassoun for over 17 months without charge or trial, on the basis of false allegations that the government itself refused to defend in court," he added, "is chilling."
Late last month, in response to a challenge filed by the ACLU, the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, and the Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center, Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford of the Western District of New York had ordered the U.S. government to release Hassoun, a Palestinian born in Lebanon who moved to the United States in 1989.
The Trump administration had tried to indefinitely detain Hassoun--claiming without evidence that he is a threat to national security--since he was transferred to immigration custody in 2017 after completing a 15-year sentence for providing material support to terrorist activities. Hassoun's sentence, which his attorneys have said was based on questionable allegations, followed years of FBI surveillance.
The government asked two appellate courts to keep Hassoun locked up following Wolford's order, but those requests "are now moot due to Hassoun's release to a foreign country," according to the ACLU. "However, Hassoun's motion for sanctions against the government for hiding and destroying evidence of his innocence remains pending before the district court."
Jonathan Manes of the MacArthur Justice Center at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law said Wednesday that "Mr. Hassoun has finally regained his freedom years after completing his criminal sentence, but every day of his detention under the PATRIOT Act has been an injustice."
"Mr. Hassoun was detained for 17 months based on lies from jailhouse informants desperate to avoid deportation," Manes continued. "The government's claim that it could imprison Mr. Hassoun indefinitely without any court looking into the facts is both deeply authoritarian and fundamentally unconstitutional."
"This case," he declared, "shows exactly why the government cannot have the power to lock people up unilaterally, without a fair trial, in the name of national security."
Nicole Hallett, one of Hassoun's attorneys and director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, concurred.
"Mr. Hassoun's case," she said, "shows precisely why the government should not have the authority to indefinitely detain anyone without robust judicial review."
The ACLU announced on Wednesday that the legal group's client Adham Hassoun was released to an undisclosed country under a confidential court agreement after being detained by the Trump administration for over 17 months without charge or trial under a never-before-used provision of the USA PATRIOT Act.
"That the government was able to hold Mr. Hassoun for over 17 months without charge or trial, on the basis of false allegations that the government itself refused to defend in court, is chilling."
--Jonathan Hafetz, ACLU
"Mr. Hassoun was the first person to be unlawfully detained under the PATRIOT Act. This court victory makes clear he should be the last," ACLU senior staff attorney Jonathan Hafetz said in a statement.
"Our client's freedom is a victory for the rule of law, and reaffirms that the government does not have unreviewable powers to lock someone up without due process," said Hafetz. "But this entire case has been a travesty, as well as an abuse of a power that the government never should have had in the first place."
"That the government was able to hold Mr. Hassoun for over 17 months without charge or trial, on the basis of false allegations that the government itself refused to defend in court," he added, "is chilling."
Late last month, in response to a challenge filed by the ACLU, the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, and the Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center, Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford of the Western District of New York had ordered the U.S. government to release Hassoun, a Palestinian born in Lebanon who moved to the United States in 1989.
The Trump administration had tried to indefinitely detain Hassoun--claiming without evidence that he is a threat to national security--since he was transferred to immigration custody in 2017 after completing a 15-year sentence for providing material support to terrorist activities. Hassoun's sentence, which his attorneys have said was based on questionable allegations, followed years of FBI surveillance.
The government asked two appellate courts to keep Hassoun locked up following Wolford's order, but those requests "are now moot due to Hassoun's release to a foreign country," according to the ACLU. "However, Hassoun's motion for sanctions against the government for hiding and destroying evidence of his innocence remains pending before the district court."
Jonathan Manes of the MacArthur Justice Center at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law said Wednesday that "Mr. Hassoun has finally regained his freedom years after completing his criminal sentence, but every day of his detention under the PATRIOT Act has been an injustice."
"Mr. Hassoun was detained for 17 months based on lies from jailhouse informants desperate to avoid deportation," Manes continued. "The government's claim that it could imprison Mr. Hassoun indefinitely without any court looking into the facts is both deeply authoritarian and fundamentally unconstitutional."
"This case," he declared, "shows exactly why the government cannot have the power to lock people up unilaterally, without a fair trial, in the name of national security."
Nicole Hallett, one of Hassoun's attorneys and director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, concurred.
"Mr. Hassoun's case," she said, "shows precisely why the government should not have the authority to indefinitely detain anyone without robust judicial review."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.