

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

National security adviser John Bolton at a meeting with President Donald Trump on September 28, 2018. (Photo: Oliver Contreras/The Washington Post/Getty Images)
Free speech advocacy group PEN America filed a legal brief Friday condemning the ongoing effort by President Donald Trump's White House to block former national security adviser John Bolton's forthcoming book as a politically motivated and dangerous assault on the First Amendment.
"It is not difficult to see what is going on: The president is employing the apparatus of the federal government to punish his political enemies, thwart freedom of speech, and pursue his political interests in an election year."
--PEN America
"A free society cannot abide the government silencing certain perspectives before they are even uttered; such censorship runs contrary to the very notion of what our First Amendment was written to guard against," Nora Benavidez, PEN America's director of U.S. free expression programs, said in a statement.
"Any result other than dismissal in this case will be an affront to Bolton's First Amendment right to speak and to all of our rights as members of the public and as readers to learn about his views," Benavidez added. "We'll continue to fight these censorship tactics for our writer members and their readers."
The brief (pdf) comes days after the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit attempting to delay publication of Bolton's book, which is set for release on June 23. On Wednesday, the Justice Department asked Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to issue an emergency injunction halting distribution of the book, asserting that it contains classified information. Lamberth is set to hear arguments in the case on Friday.
In its brief, PEN calls on Lamberth to deny the Justice Department's injunction request, calling it an unlawful prior restraint "on speech and on the press."
"PEN America supports the First Amendment right of public employees to produce works that are critical of the government, and of readers to receive their unique perspective unfettered by government censorship," the brief states. "It is not difficult to see what is going on: The president is employing the apparatus of the federal government to punish his political enemies, thwart freedom of speech, and pursue his political interests in an election year."
The ACLU and the Knight First Amendment Institute also filed briefs Friday urging the judge to deny the Justice Department's request.
"John Bolton's book has already been excerpted in most major papers, read aloud on national television, and delivered to bookstores worldwide. The cat is not simply out of the bag, it has left the country," Brett Max Kaufman, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Center for Democracy, said in a statement. "If the powers the government is claiming were not so dangerous, this lawsuit would be a farce."
This article has been updated with comment from the ACLU.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Free speech advocacy group PEN America filed a legal brief Friday condemning the ongoing effort by President Donald Trump's White House to block former national security adviser John Bolton's forthcoming book as a politically motivated and dangerous assault on the First Amendment.
"It is not difficult to see what is going on: The president is employing the apparatus of the federal government to punish his political enemies, thwart freedom of speech, and pursue his political interests in an election year."
--PEN America
"A free society cannot abide the government silencing certain perspectives before they are even uttered; such censorship runs contrary to the very notion of what our First Amendment was written to guard against," Nora Benavidez, PEN America's director of U.S. free expression programs, said in a statement.
"Any result other than dismissal in this case will be an affront to Bolton's First Amendment right to speak and to all of our rights as members of the public and as readers to learn about his views," Benavidez added. "We'll continue to fight these censorship tactics for our writer members and their readers."
The brief (pdf) comes days after the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit attempting to delay publication of Bolton's book, which is set for release on June 23. On Wednesday, the Justice Department asked Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to issue an emergency injunction halting distribution of the book, asserting that it contains classified information. Lamberth is set to hear arguments in the case on Friday.
In its brief, PEN calls on Lamberth to deny the Justice Department's injunction request, calling it an unlawful prior restraint "on speech and on the press."
"PEN America supports the First Amendment right of public employees to produce works that are critical of the government, and of readers to receive their unique perspective unfettered by government censorship," the brief states. "It is not difficult to see what is going on: The president is employing the apparatus of the federal government to punish his political enemies, thwart freedom of speech, and pursue his political interests in an election year."
The ACLU and the Knight First Amendment Institute also filed briefs Friday urging the judge to deny the Justice Department's request.
"John Bolton's book has already been excerpted in most major papers, read aloud on national television, and delivered to bookstores worldwide. The cat is not simply out of the bag, it has left the country," Brett Max Kaufman, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Center for Democracy, said in a statement. "If the powers the government is claiming were not so dangerous, this lawsuit would be a farce."
This article has been updated with comment from the ACLU.
Free speech advocacy group PEN America filed a legal brief Friday condemning the ongoing effort by President Donald Trump's White House to block former national security adviser John Bolton's forthcoming book as a politically motivated and dangerous assault on the First Amendment.
"It is not difficult to see what is going on: The president is employing the apparatus of the federal government to punish his political enemies, thwart freedom of speech, and pursue his political interests in an election year."
--PEN America
"A free society cannot abide the government silencing certain perspectives before they are even uttered; such censorship runs contrary to the very notion of what our First Amendment was written to guard against," Nora Benavidez, PEN America's director of U.S. free expression programs, said in a statement.
"Any result other than dismissal in this case will be an affront to Bolton's First Amendment right to speak and to all of our rights as members of the public and as readers to learn about his views," Benavidez added. "We'll continue to fight these censorship tactics for our writer members and their readers."
The brief (pdf) comes days after the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit attempting to delay publication of Bolton's book, which is set for release on June 23. On Wednesday, the Justice Department asked Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to issue an emergency injunction halting distribution of the book, asserting that it contains classified information. Lamberth is set to hear arguments in the case on Friday.
In its brief, PEN calls on Lamberth to deny the Justice Department's injunction request, calling it an unlawful prior restraint "on speech and on the press."
"PEN America supports the First Amendment right of public employees to produce works that are critical of the government, and of readers to receive their unique perspective unfettered by government censorship," the brief states. "It is not difficult to see what is going on: The president is employing the apparatus of the federal government to punish his political enemies, thwart freedom of speech, and pursue his political interests in an election year."
The ACLU and the Knight First Amendment Institute also filed briefs Friday urging the judge to deny the Justice Department's request.
"John Bolton's book has already been excerpted in most major papers, read aloud on national television, and delivered to bookstores worldwide. The cat is not simply out of the bag, it has left the country," Brett Max Kaufman, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Center for Democracy, said in a statement. "If the powers the government is claiming were not so dangerous, this lawsuit would be a farce."
This article has been updated with comment from the ACLU.