SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Attorney General William Barr listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office before signing an executive order on May 28, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Doug MIlls-Pool/Getty Images)
Defending Assault on Peaceful Protesters in DC, William Barr Falsely Claims Pepper Spray 'Not a Chemical Irritant'
"Barr is lying. Pepper balls contain chemical irritants. They are paint balls stuffed with oleoresin capsicum. Pepper spray is also a chemical irritant."
Jun 07, 2020
In an interview on CBS that aired Sunday, Attorney General William Barr defended the police assault on peaceful protesters in the nation's capital on June 1--an attack he personally ordered--by falsely claiming that the chemical irritants deployed by law enforcement against demonstrators were not, in fact, chemical irritants.
"There was no tear gas used," Barr said on Face the Nation, echoing a claim that the U.S. Park Police has since walked back. "The tear gas was used Sunday when they had to clear H Street to allow the fire department to come in to save St. John's Church. That's when tear gas was used."
When CBS host Margaret Brennan pointed out that police used chemical irritants to disperse crowds of demonstrators, Barr--in an apparent effort to downplay the severity of the police assault--responded: "No, there were not chemical irritants. Pepper spray is not a chemical irritant. It's not chemical."
Watch:
Critics immediately took Barr to task, with several reporters pointing out that PepperBall--a private company that distributes the projectiles to law enforcement--describes its product in marketing material as "the most effective chemical irritant available."
"Barr is lying," tweeted investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein. "Pepper balls contain chemical irritants. They are paint balls stuffed with oleoresin capsicum. Pepper spray is also a chemical irritant."
As The Daily Beast's Justin Baragona noted, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "classifies pepper spray as a form of tear gas, prompting the spokesperson for the Park Police to admit it was a 'mistake' for them to have claimed officers didn't use tear gas on the scene."
"The CDC specifically says pepper spray is a chemical compound that can 'temporarily make people unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin'--in other words, a chemical irritant," Baragona wrote.
Science writer Katie Mack noted on Twitter that "pepper spray isn't a single chemical, but actually contains quite a number of chemicals, many of which, including capsaicin, are extremely dangerous."
Barr's comments came as he is facing growing pressure to resign over his role in the law enforcement attack on peaceful demonstrators last Monday, which cleared the way for President Donald Trump's photo-op at St. John's Episcopal Church. The ACLU is suing Trump and Barr over the attack, calling it "shameless, unconstitutional, unprovoked, and frankly criminal."
The nation's top law enforcement official has also faced backlash over his deployment of agents from the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives as part of the Trump administration's effort to quell mass demonstrations over the police killing of George Floyd on May 25.
Many of these agents, as Common Dreams reported, have been patrolling the streets of Washington, D.C. in recent days without wearing badges or any other identifying information.
In an op-ed for USA Today on Friday, Noah Bookbinder and Donald Sherman of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington urged Congress to immediately "start the process of removing Barr before his willingness to use the power of the Department of Justice for President Trump's dangerous political ends hurts more Americans."
"Attorney General Bill Barr is too dangerous to democracy and to the well-being of Americans to be left in place," Bookbinder and Sherman wrote. "He must be removed from office. Congress should start the process now."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In an interview on CBS that aired Sunday, Attorney General William Barr defended the police assault on peaceful protesters in the nation's capital on June 1--an attack he personally ordered--by falsely claiming that the chemical irritants deployed by law enforcement against demonstrators were not, in fact, chemical irritants.
"There was no tear gas used," Barr said on Face the Nation, echoing a claim that the U.S. Park Police has since walked back. "The tear gas was used Sunday when they had to clear H Street to allow the fire department to come in to save St. John's Church. That's when tear gas was used."
When CBS host Margaret Brennan pointed out that police used chemical irritants to disperse crowds of demonstrators, Barr--in an apparent effort to downplay the severity of the police assault--responded: "No, there were not chemical irritants. Pepper spray is not a chemical irritant. It's not chemical."
Watch:
Critics immediately took Barr to task, with several reporters pointing out that PepperBall--a private company that distributes the projectiles to law enforcement--describes its product in marketing material as "the most effective chemical irritant available."
"Barr is lying," tweeted investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein. "Pepper balls contain chemical irritants. They are paint balls stuffed with oleoresin capsicum. Pepper spray is also a chemical irritant."
As The Daily Beast's Justin Baragona noted, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "classifies pepper spray as a form of tear gas, prompting the spokesperson for the Park Police to admit it was a 'mistake' for them to have claimed officers didn't use tear gas on the scene."
"The CDC specifically says pepper spray is a chemical compound that can 'temporarily make people unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin'--in other words, a chemical irritant," Baragona wrote.
Science writer Katie Mack noted on Twitter that "pepper spray isn't a single chemical, but actually contains quite a number of chemicals, many of which, including capsaicin, are extremely dangerous."
Barr's comments came as he is facing growing pressure to resign over his role in the law enforcement attack on peaceful demonstrators last Monday, which cleared the way for President Donald Trump's photo-op at St. John's Episcopal Church. The ACLU is suing Trump and Barr over the attack, calling it "shameless, unconstitutional, unprovoked, and frankly criminal."
The nation's top law enforcement official has also faced backlash over his deployment of agents from the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives as part of the Trump administration's effort to quell mass demonstrations over the police killing of George Floyd on May 25.
Many of these agents, as Common Dreams reported, have been patrolling the streets of Washington, D.C. in recent days without wearing badges or any other identifying information.
In an op-ed for USA Today on Friday, Noah Bookbinder and Donald Sherman of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington urged Congress to immediately "start the process of removing Barr before his willingness to use the power of the Department of Justice for President Trump's dangerous political ends hurts more Americans."
"Attorney General Bill Barr is too dangerous to democracy and to the well-being of Americans to be left in place," Bookbinder and Sherman wrote. "He must be removed from office. Congress should start the process now."
In an interview on CBS that aired Sunday, Attorney General William Barr defended the police assault on peaceful protesters in the nation's capital on June 1--an attack he personally ordered--by falsely claiming that the chemical irritants deployed by law enforcement against demonstrators were not, in fact, chemical irritants.
"There was no tear gas used," Barr said on Face the Nation, echoing a claim that the U.S. Park Police has since walked back. "The tear gas was used Sunday when they had to clear H Street to allow the fire department to come in to save St. John's Church. That's when tear gas was used."
When CBS host Margaret Brennan pointed out that police used chemical irritants to disperse crowds of demonstrators, Barr--in an apparent effort to downplay the severity of the police assault--responded: "No, there were not chemical irritants. Pepper spray is not a chemical irritant. It's not chemical."
Watch:
Critics immediately took Barr to task, with several reporters pointing out that PepperBall--a private company that distributes the projectiles to law enforcement--describes its product in marketing material as "the most effective chemical irritant available."
"Barr is lying," tweeted investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein. "Pepper balls contain chemical irritants. They are paint balls stuffed with oleoresin capsicum. Pepper spray is also a chemical irritant."
As The Daily Beast's Justin Baragona noted, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "classifies pepper spray as a form of tear gas, prompting the spokesperson for the Park Police to admit it was a 'mistake' for them to have claimed officers didn't use tear gas on the scene."
"The CDC specifically says pepper spray is a chemical compound that can 'temporarily make people unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin'--in other words, a chemical irritant," Baragona wrote.
Science writer Katie Mack noted on Twitter that "pepper spray isn't a single chemical, but actually contains quite a number of chemicals, many of which, including capsaicin, are extremely dangerous."
Barr's comments came as he is facing growing pressure to resign over his role in the law enforcement attack on peaceful demonstrators last Monday, which cleared the way for President Donald Trump's photo-op at St. John's Episcopal Church. The ACLU is suing Trump and Barr over the attack, calling it "shameless, unconstitutional, unprovoked, and frankly criminal."
The nation's top law enforcement official has also faced backlash over his deployment of agents from the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives as part of the Trump administration's effort to quell mass demonstrations over the police killing of George Floyd on May 25.
Many of these agents, as Common Dreams reported, have been patrolling the streets of Washington, D.C. in recent days without wearing badges or any other identifying information.
In an op-ed for USA Today on Friday, Noah Bookbinder and Donald Sherman of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington urged Congress to immediately "start the process of removing Barr before his willingness to use the power of the Department of Justice for President Trump's dangerous political ends hurts more Americans."
"Attorney General Bill Barr is too dangerous to democracy and to the well-being of Americans to be left in place," Bookbinder and Sherman wrote. "He must be removed from office. Congress should start the process now."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.