To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Independent journalist Emily Atkin argues that while it's "great" that a small sex toy company is doing what it can to help address the devastation in Australia, it should not go unstated just how problematic it is. (Image: Geeky Sex Toys / Instagram)
As independent journalist Emily Atkin astutely points out, this is the kind of thing that happens when "the fossil fuel industry is not made to pay for climate disasters."
In a Monday morning post for her climate-focused newsletter HEATED, Atkin highlights the story of an Australian sex toy company who is now crowd-sourcing relief funds for the devastating wildfires in that country by selling a signature dildo.
The effort, Atkin explains, is emblematic of a dynamic in which the people most responsible for the climate crisis--namely the executives and investors in major oil, gas, and coal companies--avoid paying the cost of their destruction while leaving that burden to the individuals, taxpayers, and creative (and voluntary) efforts of the private sector.
\u201cHere's a headline I never thought I'd write \n\nhttps://t.co/wIsDDvId2X\u201d— Emily Atkin (@Emily Atkin) 1578917276
According to Atkin:
The Down-Under Donation Dildo is very silly. As of Sunday night, Geeky Sex Toys's original tweet about the product had more than 3,000 retweets and 5,500 likes, and most responses were jokes. "When we Aussies say our country's fucked... im not sure this is what we had in mind," one user said. "Gives new meaning to 'down under,'" said another.
But the Down-Under Donation Dildo is also working. On Monday, Geeky Sex Toys announced that it had raised more than $15,000 for wildfire relief since it launched the product on Thursday.
Amid the devastating fires in Australia, as Common Dreams reported last week, the demand for the fossil fuel industry to pay for fire-fighting and relief efforts has been intense.
Atkin argues that while it's "great" that a small sex toy company is doing what it can to help address the devastation--and the same has been said of celebrities offering large donations and countless fundraising drives by various groups--it should not go unstated just how problematic it is that such efforts are needed given the scale of wealth possessed by the very companies most responsible for the fires that climate scientists agree are the result of a warmer world brought on by carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions.
She writes:
We are not all created equal when it comes to responsibility for the climate crisis. Research published in the journal Climatic Change shows that just 90 companies are responsible for nearly two-thirds of historical greenhouse gas emissions.
These companies are mostly fossil fuel and cement companies, and most have done nothing to help pay for Australia's ongoing climate disaster. Chevron is a notable exception; as we reported here last week, the oil company donated $1 million to Australia wildfire relief.
Chevron's donation is paltry, however, given its earnings and relative contribution to the climate crisis. Not only is Chevron the second-largest historical emitter of all the 90 companies, it also earned about $15 billion in 2018. So a $1 million donation amounts to about .00667 of its yearly earnings. To the average American, that donation would amount to about $3.96.
That we "shouldn't have to sell silicone penises to pay for the effects of climate change," said Atkin, doesn't mean there is anything wrong with any of the efforts to raise money for Australia. But it does highlight just how wrong it is when the polluters can get away with unparalleled climate crimes without society demanding they be held to account.
What this effort by a well-meaning sex toy company offers, she said, is "just another example of regular people doing far more than fossil fuel companies and billionaires, in proportion to their relative wealth and moral responsibility, to meet the excessive financial demands of climate change."
Sign up to subscribe to Atkin's newsletter here.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
As independent journalist Emily Atkin astutely points out, this is the kind of thing that happens when "the fossil fuel industry is not made to pay for climate disasters."
In a Monday morning post for her climate-focused newsletter HEATED, Atkin highlights the story of an Australian sex toy company who is now crowd-sourcing relief funds for the devastating wildfires in that country by selling a signature dildo.
The effort, Atkin explains, is emblematic of a dynamic in which the people most responsible for the climate crisis--namely the executives and investors in major oil, gas, and coal companies--avoid paying the cost of their destruction while leaving that burden to the individuals, taxpayers, and creative (and voluntary) efforts of the private sector.
\u201cHere's a headline I never thought I'd write \n\nhttps://t.co/wIsDDvId2X\u201d— Emily Atkin (@Emily Atkin) 1578917276
According to Atkin:
The Down-Under Donation Dildo is very silly. As of Sunday night, Geeky Sex Toys's original tweet about the product had more than 3,000 retweets and 5,500 likes, and most responses were jokes. "When we Aussies say our country's fucked... im not sure this is what we had in mind," one user said. "Gives new meaning to 'down under,'" said another.
But the Down-Under Donation Dildo is also working. On Monday, Geeky Sex Toys announced that it had raised more than $15,000 for wildfire relief since it launched the product on Thursday.
Amid the devastating fires in Australia, as Common Dreams reported last week, the demand for the fossil fuel industry to pay for fire-fighting and relief efforts has been intense.
Atkin argues that while it's "great" that a small sex toy company is doing what it can to help address the devastation--and the same has been said of celebrities offering large donations and countless fundraising drives by various groups--it should not go unstated just how problematic it is that such efforts are needed given the scale of wealth possessed by the very companies most responsible for the fires that climate scientists agree are the result of a warmer world brought on by carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions.
She writes:
We are not all created equal when it comes to responsibility for the climate crisis. Research published in the journal Climatic Change shows that just 90 companies are responsible for nearly two-thirds of historical greenhouse gas emissions.
These companies are mostly fossil fuel and cement companies, and most have done nothing to help pay for Australia's ongoing climate disaster. Chevron is a notable exception; as we reported here last week, the oil company donated $1 million to Australia wildfire relief.
Chevron's donation is paltry, however, given its earnings and relative contribution to the climate crisis. Not only is Chevron the second-largest historical emitter of all the 90 companies, it also earned about $15 billion in 2018. So a $1 million donation amounts to about .00667 of its yearly earnings. To the average American, that donation would amount to about $3.96.
That we "shouldn't have to sell silicone penises to pay for the effects of climate change," said Atkin, doesn't mean there is anything wrong with any of the efforts to raise money for Australia. But it does highlight just how wrong it is when the polluters can get away with unparalleled climate crimes without society demanding they be held to account.
What this effort by a well-meaning sex toy company offers, she said, is "just another example of regular people doing far more than fossil fuel companies and billionaires, in proportion to their relative wealth and moral responsibility, to meet the excessive financial demands of climate change."
Sign up to subscribe to Atkin's newsletter here.
As independent journalist Emily Atkin astutely points out, this is the kind of thing that happens when "the fossil fuel industry is not made to pay for climate disasters."
In a Monday morning post for her climate-focused newsletter HEATED, Atkin highlights the story of an Australian sex toy company who is now crowd-sourcing relief funds for the devastating wildfires in that country by selling a signature dildo.
The effort, Atkin explains, is emblematic of a dynamic in which the people most responsible for the climate crisis--namely the executives and investors in major oil, gas, and coal companies--avoid paying the cost of their destruction while leaving that burden to the individuals, taxpayers, and creative (and voluntary) efforts of the private sector.
\u201cHere's a headline I never thought I'd write \n\nhttps://t.co/wIsDDvId2X\u201d— Emily Atkin (@Emily Atkin) 1578917276
According to Atkin:
The Down-Under Donation Dildo is very silly. As of Sunday night, Geeky Sex Toys's original tweet about the product had more than 3,000 retweets and 5,500 likes, and most responses were jokes. "When we Aussies say our country's fucked... im not sure this is what we had in mind," one user said. "Gives new meaning to 'down under,'" said another.
But the Down-Under Donation Dildo is also working. On Monday, Geeky Sex Toys announced that it had raised more than $15,000 for wildfire relief since it launched the product on Thursday.
Amid the devastating fires in Australia, as Common Dreams reported last week, the demand for the fossil fuel industry to pay for fire-fighting and relief efforts has been intense.
Atkin argues that while it's "great" that a small sex toy company is doing what it can to help address the devastation--and the same has been said of celebrities offering large donations and countless fundraising drives by various groups--it should not go unstated just how problematic it is that such efforts are needed given the scale of wealth possessed by the very companies most responsible for the fires that climate scientists agree are the result of a warmer world brought on by carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions.
She writes:
We are not all created equal when it comes to responsibility for the climate crisis. Research published in the journal Climatic Change shows that just 90 companies are responsible for nearly two-thirds of historical greenhouse gas emissions.
These companies are mostly fossil fuel and cement companies, and most have done nothing to help pay for Australia's ongoing climate disaster. Chevron is a notable exception; as we reported here last week, the oil company donated $1 million to Australia wildfire relief.
Chevron's donation is paltry, however, given its earnings and relative contribution to the climate crisis. Not only is Chevron the second-largest historical emitter of all the 90 companies, it also earned about $15 billion in 2018. So a $1 million donation amounts to about .00667 of its yearly earnings. To the average American, that donation would amount to about $3.96.
That we "shouldn't have to sell silicone penises to pay for the effects of climate change," said Atkin, doesn't mean there is anything wrong with any of the efforts to raise money for Australia. But it does highlight just how wrong it is when the polluters can get away with unparalleled climate crimes without society demanding they be held to account.
What this effort by a well-meaning sex toy company offers, she said, is "just another example of regular people doing far more than fossil fuel companies and billionaires, in proportion to their relative wealth and moral responsibility, to meet the excessive financial demands of climate change."
Sign up to subscribe to Atkin's newsletter here.