SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A tree-line street in the suburb of Brookline, Massachusetts outside Boston. The town council this week voted overwhelmingly to approve new rules that would forbid fossil fuel infrastructure for new residential construction. (Photo: John Allspaw/flicker/cc)
Offering National Model, This New England Town Just Banned Natural Gas and Oil in New Home Construction
"Brookline is making history."
Nov 21, 2019
Setting a new standard for other communities in the United States and elsewhere to follow in this age of climate emergency, the suburban town of Brookline, Massachusetts this week passed a sweeping new bylaw that prohibits nearly all use of natural gas and oil in the construction of new homes or in the renovation of existing ones.
According to the Boston Globe:
By an overwhelming margin Wednesday night, Brookline Town Meeting voted to ban oil and gas piping in future construction projects, becoming the first community in Massachusetts to pass such a measure. And while over 15 cities in California have passed similar bans, Brookline's bylaw goes further, prohibiting the installation of new oil and gas infrastructure in gut renovations, in addition to new buildings.
Supporters say the bylaw will singlehandedly decrease carbon emissions from buildings in Brookline -- which account for about two-thirds of the town's overall emissions -- by 15 percent over the next 30 years. It passed by a vote of 207 to 3 and is slated to take effect on Jan. 1, 2021.
"When you're in a hole, you stop digging," said Brookline state Rep. Tommy Vitolo, praising the measure. "We must reduce the carbon emissions in our buildings dramatically."
Climate action groups applauded the measure:
Kathleen Scanlon, a member of the Brookline Town Meeting and one proposals key backers, said that despite opposition from the utilities and many area developers--many of whom raised fears about construction costs and feasibility--constructing new homes with energy-efficiency in mind is the financially smart thing to do and will ultimately ease the transition to a future without fossil fuels.
"Our research indicates that it's cost neutral," Scanlon told WBUR, "and, over time, the operating costs are lower to go with an electric building system."
The Globe notes that the while the measure is far-reaching, there were some compromises built in. "Fuel piping will still be allowed for backup generators, cooking, laboratories and medical offices, and hot water systems in large buildings," the newspaper noted. "All other energy needs for new buildings--including heating and most hot water systems--will be required to rely on electricity."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Setting a new standard for other communities in the United States and elsewhere to follow in this age of climate emergency, the suburban town of Brookline, Massachusetts this week passed a sweeping new bylaw that prohibits nearly all use of natural gas and oil in the construction of new homes or in the renovation of existing ones.
According to the Boston Globe:
By an overwhelming margin Wednesday night, Brookline Town Meeting voted to ban oil and gas piping in future construction projects, becoming the first community in Massachusetts to pass such a measure. And while over 15 cities in California have passed similar bans, Brookline's bylaw goes further, prohibiting the installation of new oil and gas infrastructure in gut renovations, in addition to new buildings.
Supporters say the bylaw will singlehandedly decrease carbon emissions from buildings in Brookline -- which account for about two-thirds of the town's overall emissions -- by 15 percent over the next 30 years. It passed by a vote of 207 to 3 and is slated to take effect on Jan. 1, 2021.
"When you're in a hole, you stop digging," said Brookline state Rep. Tommy Vitolo, praising the measure. "We must reduce the carbon emissions in our buildings dramatically."
Climate action groups applauded the measure:
Kathleen Scanlon, a member of the Brookline Town Meeting and one proposals key backers, said that despite opposition from the utilities and many area developers--many of whom raised fears about construction costs and feasibility--constructing new homes with energy-efficiency in mind is the financially smart thing to do and will ultimately ease the transition to a future without fossil fuels.
"Our research indicates that it's cost neutral," Scanlon told WBUR, "and, over time, the operating costs are lower to go with an electric building system."
The Globe notes that the while the measure is far-reaching, there were some compromises built in. "Fuel piping will still be allowed for backup generators, cooking, laboratories and medical offices, and hot water systems in large buildings," the newspaper noted. "All other energy needs for new buildings--including heating and most hot water systems--will be required to rely on electricity."
Setting a new standard for other communities in the United States and elsewhere to follow in this age of climate emergency, the suburban town of Brookline, Massachusetts this week passed a sweeping new bylaw that prohibits nearly all use of natural gas and oil in the construction of new homes or in the renovation of existing ones.
According to the Boston Globe:
By an overwhelming margin Wednesday night, Brookline Town Meeting voted to ban oil and gas piping in future construction projects, becoming the first community in Massachusetts to pass such a measure. And while over 15 cities in California have passed similar bans, Brookline's bylaw goes further, prohibiting the installation of new oil and gas infrastructure in gut renovations, in addition to new buildings.
Supporters say the bylaw will singlehandedly decrease carbon emissions from buildings in Brookline -- which account for about two-thirds of the town's overall emissions -- by 15 percent over the next 30 years. It passed by a vote of 207 to 3 and is slated to take effect on Jan. 1, 2021.
"When you're in a hole, you stop digging," said Brookline state Rep. Tommy Vitolo, praising the measure. "We must reduce the carbon emissions in our buildings dramatically."
Climate action groups applauded the measure:
Kathleen Scanlon, a member of the Brookline Town Meeting and one proposals key backers, said that despite opposition from the utilities and many area developers--many of whom raised fears about construction costs and feasibility--constructing new homes with energy-efficiency in mind is the financially smart thing to do and will ultimately ease the transition to a future without fossil fuels.
"Our research indicates that it's cost neutral," Scanlon told WBUR, "and, over time, the operating costs are lower to go with an electric building system."
The Globe notes that the while the measure is far-reaching, there were some compromises built in. "Fuel piping will still be allowed for backup generators, cooking, laboratories and medical offices, and hot water systems in large buildings," the newspaper noted. "All other energy needs for new buildings--including heating and most hot water systems--will be required to rely on electricity."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.