One of the banners hung by the group Beyond Extreme Energy (BXE) during Saturday's protest. (Image: BXE)
Activists Demand Regulator Reject All New Energy Projects in Her Last Weeks on Job Because Planet Can't Wait
"We cannot lock our national energy grid into decades more of fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil."
Protesters on Saturday descended on the Wellselly, Massachusetts home of federal regulator Cheryl LaFleur, demanding she reject new energy infrastructure projects.
LaFleur is a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has the power to approve projects such as oil and gas pipelines that cross state lines. FERC can, of course, reject these projects as well.
Activists from the group Beyond Extreme Energy (BXE) dropped banners reading "You can't be neutral on a burning planet" and "Vote for the future you want for your grandchildren." The group is demanding LaFleur reject every project that comes before the commission through the end of her term, which is up in August.
Because FERC has only four of its five commissioners seated, LaFleur has recently been the swing vote on natural gas projects. The regulator will not return to the commission after August, leaving her replacement appointment in the hands of President Donald Trump, who has been hostile to solving the climate crisis and to environmental issues.
"FERC has no system for evaluating the impact of new fossil fuel infrastructure's greenhouse gas emissions or cumulative effects of climate change on communities," said BXE's Sam Delaney. "This is unacceptable conduct for a government agency tasked with protecting communities and regulating the energy industry."
LaFleur has expressed concern in the past over emissions from energy projects, but has been loathe to have those concerns dictate her votes on infrastructure.
That should change, activists said, even if she only has a month or so left to weigh in.
"The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has released a report that indicates we have less than 11 years to prevent catastrophic climate change," said Delaney. "We cannot lock our national energy grid into decades more of fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil. We must take steps to move to 100 percent renewables as quickly as possible."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Protesters on Saturday descended on the Wellselly, Massachusetts home of federal regulator Cheryl LaFleur, demanding she reject new energy infrastructure projects.
LaFleur is a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has the power to approve projects such as oil and gas pipelines that cross state lines. FERC can, of course, reject these projects as well.
Activists from the group Beyond Extreme Energy (BXE) dropped banners reading "You can't be neutral on a burning planet" and "Vote for the future you want for your grandchildren." The group is demanding LaFleur reject every project that comes before the commission through the end of her term, which is up in August.
Because FERC has only four of its five commissioners seated, LaFleur has recently been the swing vote on natural gas projects. The regulator will not return to the commission after August, leaving her replacement appointment in the hands of President Donald Trump, who has been hostile to solving the climate crisis and to environmental issues.
"FERC has no system for evaluating the impact of new fossil fuel infrastructure's greenhouse gas emissions or cumulative effects of climate change on communities," said BXE's Sam Delaney. "This is unacceptable conduct for a government agency tasked with protecting communities and regulating the energy industry."
LaFleur has expressed concern in the past over emissions from energy projects, but has been loathe to have those concerns dictate her votes on infrastructure.
That should change, activists said, even if she only has a month or so left to weigh in.
"The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has released a report that indicates we have less than 11 years to prevent catastrophic climate change," said Delaney. "We cannot lock our national energy grid into decades more of fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil. We must take steps to move to 100 percent renewables as quickly as possible."
Protesters on Saturday descended on the Wellselly, Massachusetts home of federal regulator Cheryl LaFleur, demanding she reject new energy infrastructure projects.
LaFleur is a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has the power to approve projects such as oil and gas pipelines that cross state lines. FERC can, of course, reject these projects as well.
Activists from the group Beyond Extreme Energy (BXE) dropped banners reading "You can't be neutral on a burning planet" and "Vote for the future you want for your grandchildren." The group is demanding LaFleur reject every project that comes before the commission through the end of her term, which is up in August.
Because FERC has only four of its five commissioners seated, LaFleur has recently been the swing vote on natural gas projects. The regulator will not return to the commission after August, leaving her replacement appointment in the hands of President Donald Trump, who has been hostile to solving the climate crisis and to environmental issues.
"FERC has no system for evaluating the impact of new fossil fuel infrastructure's greenhouse gas emissions or cumulative effects of climate change on communities," said BXE's Sam Delaney. "This is unacceptable conduct for a government agency tasked with protecting communities and regulating the energy industry."
LaFleur has expressed concern in the past over emissions from energy projects, but has been loathe to have those concerns dictate her votes on infrastructure.
That should change, activists said, even if she only has a month or so left to weigh in.
"The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has released a report that indicates we have less than 11 years to prevent catastrophic climate change," said Delaney. "We cannot lock our national energy grid into decades more of fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil. We must take steps to move to 100 percent renewables as quickly as possible."