

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detain an immigrant on October 14, 2015 in Los Angeles. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
In a letter to the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday, 68 retired state and federal judges implored the agency "to restore confidence in safe access to the courts" by barring immigration enforcement arrests at courthouses.
"The public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
--judges' letter
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution. For many, however, ICE's courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid," declares the letter, organized with assistance from the Brennan Center for Justice.
The letter says a January directive (pdf) from ICE, which instructed authorities to only target certain undocumented people--"aliens with criminal convictions, gang members, national security or public safety threats, aliens who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart, and aliens who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed"--in court and refrain from arresting family members or witnesses, was a step in the right direction.
However, it charges, "interrupting criminal proceedings with civil immigration arrests undermines the justice system." Thus, the judges are calling on ICE acting director Ronald Vitiello to extend the "sensitive location" designation--which applies to schools, hospitals, places of worship, and public demonstrations--to local, state, and federal courthouses.
The need for such action appears especially significant under the Trump administration. As the letter notes, "Federal immigration arrests of individuals appearing in state and local courthouses are not unique to the current administration, but reports suggest there has been a dramatic increase in ICE presence in courthouses over the last two years."
"Persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions."
--letter
That aligns with other ramped up immigration initiatives under President Donald Trump--who has provoked global disdain for his moves to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA); impose restrictions on travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries; make it harder for people to seek asylum in the U.S.; and forcibly separate migrant children from their parents.
In terms of immigrants targeted by ICE at courthouses, "persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions," the letter points out, citing documented instances in at least 23 states.
ICE, for its part, doesn't seem willing to reconsider its rules. In a statement to the Associated Press, agency spokeswoman Liz Johnson described courthouse arrests as "a routine practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country," and claimed that "because many jurisdictions no longer allow ICE to take custody of aliens inside of jails, courthouses are the next safest option."
Addressing that position, the letter states: "We understand that ICE favors courthouse arrests because it considers courts to be safe environments where officers are confident they can operate without danger. But it is exactly that sense of safety that we as judges tried to foster for anyone seeking access to justice, and that we believe ICE's courthouse activities put at risk."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a letter to the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday, 68 retired state and federal judges implored the agency "to restore confidence in safe access to the courts" by barring immigration enforcement arrests at courthouses.
"The public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
--judges' letter
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution. For many, however, ICE's courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid," declares the letter, organized with assistance from the Brennan Center for Justice.
The letter says a January directive (pdf) from ICE, which instructed authorities to only target certain undocumented people--"aliens with criminal convictions, gang members, national security or public safety threats, aliens who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart, and aliens who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed"--in court and refrain from arresting family members or witnesses, was a step in the right direction.
However, it charges, "interrupting criminal proceedings with civil immigration arrests undermines the justice system." Thus, the judges are calling on ICE acting director Ronald Vitiello to extend the "sensitive location" designation--which applies to schools, hospitals, places of worship, and public demonstrations--to local, state, and federal courthouses.
The need for such action appears especially significant under the Trump administration. As the letter notes, "Federal immigration arrests of individuals appearing in state and local courthouses are not unique to the current administration, but reports suggest there has been a dramatic increase in ICE presence in courthouses over the last two years."
"Persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions."
--letter
That aligns with other ramped up immigration initiatives under President Donald Trump--who has provoked global disdain for his moves to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA); impose restrictions on travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries; make it harder for people to seek asylum in the U.S.; and forcibly separate migrant children from their parents.
In terms of immigrants targeted by ICE at courthouses, "persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions," the letter points out, citing documented instances in at least 23 states.
ICE, for its part, doesn't seem willing to reconsider its rules. In a statement to the Associated Press, agency spokeswoman Liz Johnson described courthouse arrests as "a routine practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country," and claimed that "because many jurisdictions no longer allow ICE to take custody of aliens inside of jails, courthouses are the next safest option."
Addressing that position, the letter states: "We understand that ICE favors courthouse arrests because it considers courts to be safe environments where officers are confident they can operate without danger. But it is exactly that sense of safety that we as judges tried to foster for anyone seeking access to justice, and that we believe ICE's courthouse activities put at risk."
In a letter to the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday, 68 retired state and federal judges implored the agency "to restore confidence in safe access to the courts" by barring immigration enforcement arrests at courthouses.
"The public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
--judges' letter
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution. For many, however, ICE's courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid," declares the letter, organized with assistance from the Brennan Center for Justice.
The letter says a January directive (pdf) from ICE, which instructed authorities to only target certain undocumented people--"aliens with criminal convictions, gang members, national security or public safety threats, aliens who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart, and aliens who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed"--in court and refrain from arresting family members or witnesses, was a step in the right direction.
However, it charges, "interrupting criminal proceedings with civil immigration arrests undermines the justice system." Thus, the judges are calling on ICE acting director Ronald Vitiello to extend the "sensitive location" designation--which applies to schools, hospitals, places of worship, and public demonstrations--to local, state, and federal courthouses.
The need for such action appears especially significant under the Trump administration. As the letter notes, "Federal immigration arrests of individuals appearing in state and local courthouses are not unique to the current administration, but reports suggest there has been a dramatic increase in ICE presence in courthouses over the last two years."
"Persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions."
--letter
That aligns with other ramped up immigration initiatives under President Donald Trump--who has provoked global disdain for his moves to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA); impose restrictions on travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries; make it harder for people to seek asylum in the U.S.; and forcibly separate migrant children from their parents.
In terms of immigrants targeted by ICE at courthouses, "persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions," the letter points out, citing documented instances in at least 23 states.
ICE, for its part, doesn't seem willing to reconsider its rules. In a statement to the Associated Press, agency spokeswoman Liz Johnson described courthouse arrests as "a routine practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country," and claimed that "because many jurisdictions no longer allow ICE to take custody of aliens inside of jails, courthouses are the next safest option."
Addressing that position, the letter states: "We understand that ICE favors courthouse arrests because it considers courts to be safe environments where officers are confident they can operate without danger. But it is exactly that sense of safety that we as judges tried to foster for anyone seeking access to justice, and that we believe ICE's courthouse activities put at risk."