SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detain an immigrant on October 14, 2015 in Los Angeles. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
To End Fear and Protect Justice, Dozens of Retired Judges Call on ICE to End Courthouse Arrests
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
Dec 11, 2018
In a letter to the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday, 68 retired state and federal judges implored the agency "to restore confidence in safe access to the courts" by barring immigration enforcement arrests at courthouses.
"The public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
--judges' letter
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution. For many, however, ICE's courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid," declares the letter, organized with assistance from the Brennan Center for Justice.
The letter says a January directive (pdf) from ICE, which instructed authorities to only target certain undocumented people--"aliens with criminal convictions, gang members, national security or public safety threats, aliens who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart, and aliens who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed"--in court and refrain from arresting family members or witnesses, was a step in the right direction.
However, it charges, "interrupting criminal proceedings with civil immigration arrests undermines the justice system." Thus, the judges are calling on ICE acting director Ronald Vitiello to extend the "sensitive location" designation--which applies to schools, hospitals, places of worship, and public demonstrations--to local, state, and federal courthouses.
The need for such action appears especially significant under the Trump administration. As the letter notes, "Federal immigration arrests of individuals appearing in state and local courthouses are not unique to the current administration, but reports suggest there has been a dramatic increase in ICE presence in courthouses over the last two years."
"Persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions."
--letter
That aligns with other ramped up immigration initiatives under President Donald Trump--who has provoked global disdain for his moves to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA); impose restrictions on travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries; make it harder for people to seek asylum in the U.S.; and forcibly separate migrant children from their parents.
In terms of immigrants targeted by ICE at courthouses, "persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions," the letter points out, citing documented instances in at least 23 states.
ICE, for its part, doesn't seem willing to reconsider its rules. In a statement to the Associated Press, agency spokeswoman Liz Johnson described courthouse arrests as "a routine practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country," and claimed that "because many jurisdictions no longer allow ICE to take custody of aliens inside of jails, courthouses are the next safest option."
Addressing that position, the letter states: "We understand that ICE favors courthouse arrests because it considers courts to be safe environments where officers are confident they can operate without danger. But it is exactly that sense of safety that we as judges tried to foster for anyone seeking access to justice, and that we believe ICE's courthouse activities put at risk."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a letter to the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday, 68 retired state and federal judges implored the agency "to restore confidence in safe access to the courts" by barring immigration enforcement arrests at courthouses.
"The public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
--judges' letter
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution. For many, however, ICE's courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid," declares the letter, organized with assistance from the Brennan Center for Justice.
The letter says a January directive (pdf) from ICE, which instructed authorities to only target certain undocumented people--"aliens with criminal convictions, gang members, national security or public safety threats, aliens who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart, and aliens who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed"--in court and refrain from arresting family members or witnesses, was a step in the right direction.
However, it charges, "interrupting criminal proceedings with civil immigration arrests undermines the justice system." Thus, the judges are calling on ICE acting director Ronald Vitiello to extend the "sensitive location" designation--which applies to schools, hospitals, places of worship, and public demonstrations--to local, state, and federal courthouses.
The need for such action appears especially significant under the Trump administration. As the letter notes, "Federal immigration arrests of individuals appearing in state and local courthouses are not unique to the current administration, but reports suggest there has been a dramatic increase in ICE presence in courthouses over the last two years."
"Persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions."
--letter
That aligns with other ramped up immigration initiatives under President Donald Trump--who has provoked global disdain for his moves to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA); impose restrictions on travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries; make it harder for people to seek asylum in the U.S.; and forcibly separate migrant children from their parents.
In terms of immigrants targeted by ICE at courthouses, "persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions," the letter points out, citing documented instances in at least 23 states.
ICE, for its part, doesn't seem willing to reconsider its rules. In a statement to the Associated Press, agency spokeswoman Liz Johnson described courthouse arrests as "a routine practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country," and claimed that "because many jurisdictions no longer allow ICE to take custody of aliens inside of jails, courthouses are the next safest option."
Addressing that position, the letter states: "We understand that ICE favors courthouse arrests because it considers courts to be safe environments where officers are confident they can operate without danger. But it is exactly that sense of safety that we as judges tried to foster for anyone seeking access to justice, and that we believe ICE's courthouse activities put at risk."
In a letter to the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday, 68 retired state and federal judges implored the agency "to restore confidence in safe access to the courts" by barring immigration enforcement arrests at courthouses.
"The public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution."
--judges' letter
"For courts to effectively do justice, ensure public safety, and serve their communities, the public must be able to access courthouses safely and without fear of retribution. For many, however, ICE's courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid," declares the letter, organized with assistance from the Brennan Center for Justice.
The letter says a January directive (pdf) from ICE, which instructed authorities to only target certain undocumented people--"aliens with criminal convictions, gang members, national security or public safety threats, aliens who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart, and aliens who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed"--in court and refrain from arresting family members or witnesses, was a step in the right direction.
However, it charges, "interrupting criminal proceedings with civil immigration arrests undermines the justice system." Thus, the judges are calling on ICE acting director Ronald Vitiello to extend the "sensitive location" designation--which applies to schools, hospitals, places of worship, and public demonstrations--to local, state, and federal courthouses.
The need for such action appears especially significant under the Trump administration. As the letter notes, "Federal immigration arrests of individuals appearing in state and local courthouses are not unique to the current administration, but reports suggest there has been a dramatic increase in ICE presence in courthouses over the last two years."
"Persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions."
--letter
That aligns with other ramped up immigration initiatives under President Donald Trump--who has provoked global disdain for his moves to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA); impose restrictions on travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries; make it harder for people to seek asylum in the U.S.; and forcibly separate migrant children from their parents.
In terms of immigrants targeted by ICE at courthouses, "persons arrested include defendants facing criminal charges, survivors of domestic violence, persons disputing traffic tickets, and parents seeking to protect their children from unsafe living conditions," the letter points out, citing documented instances in at least 23 states.
ICE, for its part, doesn't seem willing to reconsider its rules. In a statement to the Associated Press, agency spokeswoman Liz Johnson described courthouse arrests as "a routine practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country," and claimed that "because many jurisdictions no longer allow ICE to take custody of aliens inside of jails, courthouses are the next safest option."
Addressing that position, the letter states: "We understand that ICE favors courthouse arrests because it considers courts to be safe environments where officers are confident they can operate without danger. But it is exactly that sense of safety that we as judges tried to foster for anyone seeking access to justice, and that we believe ICE's courthouse activities put at risk."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.