
US Vice President Mike Pence lashed out at China in a speech on Thursday, accusing Beijing of seeking to undermine American democracy and "meddling" in elections as a way to get US President Donald Trump out of office. (Photo: Hudson Institute)
Accusing China of Falling in Line With Majority of Americans, Mike Pence Says Beijing "Wants a Different American President"
"We did not and will not interfere in any country’s domestic affairs," said Wang Yi, China's Minister of Foreign Affairs, last week
In a blatant attempt to invert the script on election "meddling" and interference, Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday accused the Chinese government of seeking to undermine U.S. democracy and charged, without evidence, that Beijing is acting malevolently because "China wants a different American president."
Speaking at the right-wing Hudson Institute, Pence told the audience that "China has initiated an unprecedented effort to influence American public opinion, the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections."
Watch:
While Pence declared that behavior of Russia "pales in comparison to what China is doing across this country," he only cited vague internal declarations by U.S. intelligence agencies and then pointed to an advertisement, purchased by the state-run China Daily newspaper, that was placed in the Des Moines Register that criticized the Trump administration's trade war tactics. Beijing, of course, has been open about its opposition to new tariffs imposed by Trump and has made no mystery about its strategy of letting U.S. farming communities and other industries understand that its economic retaliation would be targeted at Trump's political base.
The relevance of Pence's comment, reports Axios, was this:
President Trump raised eyebrows by declaring last week, without offering evidence, that China was meddling in the midterms.
- Pence is attempting to put meat on those bones, while laying out a broader case that Beijing is a threat to U.S. interests and a destabilizing force around the world.
- He'll also make an explicit comparison to Russian interference, saying: "What the Russians are doing pales in comparison to what [China] is doing across this country."
After Trump's accusations directed at China last week, Wang Yi, China's Minister of Foreign Affairs, rejected the charge directly while in New York for the United Nation's General Assembly. "We did not and will not interfere in any country's domestic affairs," said Wang. "We refuse to accept ... unwarranted accusations against China."
It was Axios, in fact, which last month reported that the White House had "secret anti-China plans" that, based on administration sources, would be launched in the weeks ahead.
But reaction to the vice president's remarks by critics on Thursday, however, warned that Pence and the Trump administration are playing a dangerous game.
Whereas Pence accused China of "reckless harassment" by increasing its military presence in the South China Sea, he said the United States "will not be intimidated" and "will not stand down," even as a Chinese and American warships came within 50 yards of one another this week in those waters.

Oriana Skylar Mastro, assistant professor of Security Studies at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, told ThinkProgress in an interview that the approach outlined in the speech is "problematic" for a number of reasons.
"Some of the things that the vice president, and indeed, the president, are saying about Chinese behavior are true, and some are an exaggeration, kind of conspiracy-theoryesque," said Mastro.
Troubling, Mastro added, the framing of China as a "meddler" in U.S. elections recreates the unhelpful "Cold-War ideological battle" which is not good for ongoing and future relations.
Sound familiar?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a blatant attempt to invert the script on election "meddling" and interference, Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday accused the Chinese government of seeking to undermine U.S. democracy and charged, without evidence, that Beijing is acting malevolently because "China wants a different American president."
Speaking at the right-wing Hudson Institute, Pence told the audience that "China has initiated an unprecedented effort to influence American public opinion, the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections."
Watch:
While Pence declared that behavior of Russia "pales in comparison to what China is doing across this country," he only cited vague internal declarations by U.S. intelligence agencies and then pointed to an advertisement, purchased by the state-run China Daily newspaper, that was placed in the Des Moines Register that criticized the Trump administration's trade war tactics. Beijing, of course, has been open about its opposition to new tariffs imposed by Trump and has made no mystery about its strategy of letting U.S. farming communities and other industries understand that its economic retaliation would be targeted at Trump's political base.
The relevance of Pence's comment, reports Axios, was this:
President Trump raised eyebrows by declaring last week, without offering evidence, that China was meddling in the midterms.
- Pence is attempting to put meat on those bones, while laying out a broader case that Beijing is a threat to U.S. interests and a destabilizing force around the world.
- He'll also make an explicit comparison to Russian interference, saying: "What the Russians are doing pales in comparison to what [China] is doing across this country."
After Trump's accusations directed at China last week, Wang Yi, China's Minister of Foreign Affairs, rejected the charge directly while in New York for the United Nation's General Assembly. "We did not and will not interfere in any country's domestic affairs," said Wang. "We refuse to accept ... unwarranted accusations against China."
It was Axios, in fact, which last month reported that the White House had "secret anti-China plans" that, based on administration sources, would be launched in the weeks ahead.
But reaction to the vice president's remarks by critics on Thursday, however, warned that Pence and the Trump administration are playing a dangerous game.
Whereas Pence accused China of "reckless harassment" by increasing its military presence in the South China Sea, he said the United States "will not be intimidated" and "will not stand down," even as a Chinese and American warships came within 50 yards of one another this week in those waters.

Oriana Skylar Mastro, assistant professor of Security Studies at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, told ThinkProgress in an interview that the approach outlined in the speech is "problematic" for a number of reasons.
"Some of the things that the vice president, and indeed, the president, are saying about Chinese behavior are true, and some are an exaggeration, kind of conspiracy-theoryesque," said Mastro.
Troubling, Mastro added, the framing of China as a "meddler" in U.S. elections recreates the unhelpful "Cold-War ideological battle" which is not good for ongoing and future relations.
Sound familiar?
In a blatant attempt to invert the script on election "meddling" and interference, Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday accused the Chinese government of seeking to undermine U.S. democracy and charged, without evidence, that Beijing is acting malevolently because "China wants a different American president."
Speaking at the right-wing Hudson Institute, Pence told the audience that "China has initiated an unprecedented effort to influence American public opinion, the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections."
Watch:
While Pence declared that behavior of Russia "pales in comparison to what China is doing across this country," he only cited vague internal declarations by U.S. intelligence agencies and then pointed to an advertisement, purchased by the state-run China Daily newspaper, that was placed in the Des Moines Register that criticized the Trump administration's trade war tactics. Beijing, of course, has been open about its opposition to new tariffs imposed by Trump and has made no mystery about its strategy of letting U.S. farming communities and other industries understand that its economic retaliation would be targeted at Trump's political base.
The relevance of Pence's comment, reports Axios, was this:
President Trump raised eyebrows by declaring last week, without offering evidence, that China was meddling in the midterms.
- Pence is attempting to put meat on those bones, while laying out a broader case that Beijing is a threat to U.S. interests and a destabilizing force around the world.
- He'll also make an explicit comparison to Russian interference, saying: "What the Russians are doing pales in comparison to what [China] is doing across this country."
After Trump's accusations directed at China last week, Wang Yi, China's Minister of Foreign Affairs, rejected the charge directly while in New York for the United Nation's General Assembly. "We did not and will not interfere in any country's domestic affairs," said Wang. "We refuse to accept ... unwarranted accusations against China."
It was Axios, in fact, which last month reported that the White House had "secret anti-China plans" that, based on administration sources, would be launched in the weeks ahead.
But reaction to the vice president's remarks by critics on Thursday, however, warned that Pence and the Trump administration are playing a dangerous game.
Whereas Pence accused China of "reckless harassment" by increasing its military presence in the South China Sea, he said the United States "will not be intimidated" and "will not stand down," even as a Chinese and American warships came within 50 yards of one another this week in those waters.

Oriana Skylar Mastro, assistant professor of Security Studies at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, told ThinkProgress in an interview that the approach outlined in the speech is "problematic" for a number of reasons.
"Some of the things that the vice president, and indeed, the president, are saying about Chinese behavior are true, and some are an exaggeration, kind of conspiracy-theoryesque," said Mastro.
Troubling, Mastro added, the framing of China as a "meddler" in U.S. elections recreates the unhelpful "Cold-War ideological battle" which is not good for ongoing and future relations.
Sound familiar?

