SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Activists with Greenpeace staged a protest of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's fossil fuel pipeline policies to coincide with his visit to London in April of 2018. (Photo: Greenpeace)
'Dumbest Policy in the World': Report Details How Canada's Massive Fossil Fuel Subsidies Undermine Climate Action
Working to curb emissions while using public funds to subsidize oil and gas industry "is like trying to bail water out of a leaky boat"
Sep 17, 2018
"What's the dumbest policy in the world? Public cash for oil and gas!"
That's according to Patrick DeRochie, Climate & Energy program manager for the Canadian group Environmental Defence, who wrote Monday about a new report that aims to shed light on the Canadian government's hundreds of millions dollars in subsidies to the fossil fuel industry.
"Actually, the final figure is likely much higher, but a lack of transparency from the federal government makes many subsidies to climate polluters difficult to quantify," DeRochie added, calling on the Canadian government to disclose just how much it's doling out to polluters.
Public Cash for Oil and Gas (pdf), produced by the #StopFundingFossils coalition--which includes the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Environmental Defence, Climate Action Network, Equiterre, and Oil Change International--emphasizes that Canada's "handouts" of taxpayer money to oil and gas producers "undermine" actions that aim to address the human-caused global climate criss.
Pointing to "strong evidence that the federal government's plan to meet Canada's 2030 climate target is 'highly inefficient' (Climate Action Tracker, 2018), necessitating greater efforts in the oil and gas sector," the report explains:
On the supply side, fossil fuel companies are most likely to react to international market price signals, such as the current upward trend in the value of WCS, and to the option to claim deductions of several of their current and past expenses now and in the future as long as their activities are profitable. Subsidies serve to promote the production of fuels at the same time that carbon pricing and climate action programs and policies are designed to reduce demand. To put it another way, combining carbon pricing and fossil fuel subsidies is like trying to bail water out of a leaky boat. If you don't fix the leak (the subsidies) you are never going to fix the problem (growing GHG emissions from the oil and gas sector.
"Our findings illustrate the need to reform the tax system so that the impact of fossil fuel subsidies on climate change and the environment is taken into account, and that public funds are managed in ways that are most beneficial to Canadians," report co-author Yanick Touchette of the IISD said in a statement.
While the report details hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks, fiscals supports, and direct grants for oil and gas production, it does not include the government's recent--and widely ridiculed--purchase of Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain Pipeline.
And although there is "strong potential that there will end up being a large subsidy involved in this purchase," the report points out that "the scale of the subsidy will not be known at least until (and if) a private sector buyer is identified and the terms of sale are released." This likely subsidy, it declares, "is inconsistent with Canada's commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025."
The report--which notes that "despite some reforms in recent years, Canada is still the largest provider of subsidies to oil and gas production in the G7 per unit of GDP"--was released just ahead of the G7 environmental ministers' meeting the Canadian government is scheduled to host Wednesday through Friday in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Catherine Abreu of Climate Action Network welcomed the Canadian government's move in June to enter a peer review process of its fossil fuel subsidies with Argentina, but called for bolder leadership.
"As 2018 G7 President, Canada needs to lead," she concluded, "in getting nations to develop a detailed roadmap on how G7 members intend to phase out these subsidies by 2025."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"What's the dumbest policy in the world? Public cash for oil and gas!"
That's according to Patrick DeRochie, Climate & Energy program manager for the Canadian group Environmental Defence, who wrote Monday about a new report that aims to shed light on the Canadian government's hundreds of millions dollars in subsidies to the fossil fuel industry.
"Actually, the final figure is likely much higher, but a lack of transparency from the federal government makes many subsidies to climate polluters difficult to quantify," DeRochie added, calling on the Canadian government to disclose just how much it's doling out to polluters.
Public Cash for Oil and Gas (pdf), produced by the #StopFundingFossils coalition--which includes the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Environmental Defence, Climate Action Network, Equiterre, and Oil Change International--emphasizes that Canada's "handouts" of taxpayer money to oil and gas producers "undermine" actions that aim to address the human-caused global climate criss.
Pointing to "strong evidence that the federal government's plan to meet Canada's 2030 climate target is 'highly inefficient' (Climate Action Tracker, 2018), necessitating greater efforts in the oil and gas sector," the report explains:
On the supply side, fossil fuel companies are most likely to react to international market price signals, such as the current upward trend in the value of WCS, and to the option to claim deductions of several of their current and past expenses now and in the future as long as their activities are profitable. Subsidies serve to promote the production of fuels at the same time that carbon pricing and climate action programs and policies are designed to reduce demand. To put it another way, combining carbon pricing and fossil fuel subsidies is like trying to bail water out of a leaky boat. If you don't fix the leak (the subsidies) you are never going to fix the problem (growing GHG emissions from the oil and gas sector.
"Our findings illustrate the need to reform the tax system so that the impact of fossil fuel subsidies on climate change and the environment is taken into account, and that public funds are managed in ways that are most beneficial to Canadians," report co-author Yanick Touchette of the IISD said in a statement.
While the report details hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks, fiscals supports, and direct grants for oil and gas production, it does not include the government's recent--and widely ridiculed--purchase of Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain Pipeline.
And although there is "strong potential that there will end up being a large subsidy involved in this purchase," the report points out that "the scale of the subsidy will not be known at least until (and if) a private sector buyer is identified and the terms of sale are released." This likely subsidy, it declares, "is inconsistent with Canada's commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025."
The report--which notes that "despite some reforms in recent years, Canada is still the largest provider of subsidies to oil and gas production in the G7 per unit of GDP"--was released just ahead of the G7 environmental ministers' meeting the Canadian government is scheduled to host Wednesday through Friday in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Catherine Abreu of Climate Action Network welcomed the Canadian government's move in June to enter a peer review process of its fossil fuel subsidies with Argentina, but called for bolder leadership.
"As 2018 G7 President, Canada needs to lead," she concluded, "in getting nations to develop a detailed roadmap on how G7 members intend to phase out these subsidies by 2025."
"What's the dumbest policy in the world? Public cash for oil and gas!"
That's according to Patrick DeRochie, Climate & Energy program manager for the Canadian group Environmental Defence, who wrote Monday about a new report that aims to shed light on the Canadian government's hundreds of millions dollars in subsidies to the fossil fuel industry.
"Actually, the final figure is likely much higher, but a lack of transparency from the federal government makes many subsidies to climate polluters difficult to quantify," DeRochie added, calling on the Canadian government to disclose just how much it's doling out to polluters.
Public Cash for Oil and Gas (pdf), produced by the #StopFundingFossils coalition--which includes the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Environmental Defence, Climate Action Network, Equiterre, and Oil Change International--emphasizes that Canada's "handouts" of taxpayer money to oil and gas producers "undermine" actions that aim to address the human-caused global climate criss.
Pointing to "strong evidence that the federal government's plan to meet Canada's 2030 climate target is 'highly inefficient' (Climate Action Tracker, 2018), necessitating greater efforts in the oil and gas sector," the report explains:
On the supply side, fossil fuel companies are most likely to react to international market price signals, such as the current upward trend in the value of WCS, and to the option to claim deductions of several of their current and past expenses now and in the future as long as their activities are profitable. Subsidies serve to promote the production of fuels at the same time that carbon pricing and climate action programs and policies are designed to reduce demand. To put it another way, combining carbon pricing and fossil fuel subsidies is like trying to bail water out of a leaky boat. If you don't fix the leak (the subsidies) you are never going to fix the problem (growing GHG emissions from the oil and gas sector.
"Our findings illustrate the need to reform the tax system so that the impact of fossil fuel subsidies on climate change and the environment is taken into account, and that public funds are managed in ways that are most beneficial to Canadians," report co-author Yanick Touchette of the IISD said in a statement.
While the report details hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks, fiscals supports, and direct grants for oil and gas production, it does not include the government's recent--and widely ridiculed--purchase of Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain Pipeline.
And although there is "strong potential that there will end up being a large subsidy involved in this purchase," the report points out that "the scale of the subsidy will not be known at least until (and if) a private sector buyer is identified and the terms of sale are released." This likely subsidy, it declares, "is inconsistent with Canada's commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025."
The report--which notes that "despite some reforms in recent years, Canada is still the largest provider of subsidies to oil and gas production in the G7 per unit of GDP"--was released just ahead of the G7 environmental ministers' meeting the Canadian government is scheduled to host Wednesday through Friday in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Catherine Abreu of Climate Action Network welcomed the Canadian government's move in June to enter a peer review process of its fossil fuel subsidies with Argentina, but called for bolder leadership.
"As 2018 G7 President, Canada needs to lead," she concluded, "in getting nations to develop a detailed roadmap on how G7 members intend to phase out these subsidies by 2025."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.