Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) (L) questions Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh during the second day of his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill September 5, 2018 in Washington, DC. Kavanaugh was nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the vacancy on the court left by retiring Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
After Explosive Grilling by Sen. Leahy, Democrats Urged to Read Kavanaugh "Committee Confidential" Files Into Public Record
"Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
After an explosive line of questioning by Sen. Patrick Leah (D-Vt.) during the second day of hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, progressive groups are calling on Democrats on the GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee to read documents now labelled as "committee confidential" into the public record as a way to expose the possibility that the nominee may have knowingly received stolen emails ahead of previous sworn testimony before Congress.
"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :
Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.
Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.
Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.
Watch part the key part of their exchange:
\u201c\ud83d\udea8LEAHY: When you worked at the WH, did anyone ever tell you they had a mole that provided them with secret info? \n\nKAVANAUGH: I don't recall\n\nL: You never received an email from a GOP staff member w/info claiming to come from spying? \n\nK: I'm not going to rule anything out. \ud83d\udea8\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1536158174
In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups--namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America--jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.
\u201cBoth Sens Hatch & Grassley continue to speak as though they don\u2019t understand Leahy\u2019s request. Leahy cannot present the evidence to Kavanaugh at the hearing b/c they have been designated \u201cCommittee Confidential.\u201dCall yr Sen. Tell Grassley to allow the public release of these docs.\u201d— Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sherrilyn Ifill) 1536177282
In a statement, the groups declared:
Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy's questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared "Committee Confidential" include emails that are highly relevant--and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh's knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.
Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents "Committee Confidential" or prohibit their public release.
If there are relevant records on this issue--or any other issue that requires public release-- they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.
In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After an explosive line of questioning by Sen. Patrick Leah (D-Vt.) during the second day of hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, progressive groups are calling on Democrats on the GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee to read documents now labelled as "committee confidential" into the public record as a way to expose the possibility that the nominee may have knowingly received stolen emails ahead of previous sworn testimony before Congress.
"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :
Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.
Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.
Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.
Watch part the key part of their exchange:
\u201c\ud83d\udea8LEAHY: When you worked at the WH, did anyone ever tell you they had a mole that provided them with secret info? \n\nKAVANAUGH: I don't recall\n\nL: You never received an email from a GOP staff member w/info claiming to come from spying? \n\nK: I'm not going to rule anything out. \ud83d\udea8\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1536158174
In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups--namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America--jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.
\u201cBoth Sens Hatch & Grassley continue to speak as though they don\u2019t understand Leahy\u2019s request. Leahy cannot present the evidence to Kavanaugh at the hearing b/c they have been designated \u201cCommittee Confidential.\u201dCall yr Sen. Tell Grassley to allow the public release of these docs.\u201d— Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sherrilyn Ifill) 1536177282
In a statement, the groups declared:
Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy's questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared "Committee Confidential" include emails that are highly relevant--and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh's knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.
Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents "Committee Confidential" or prohibit their public release.
If there are relevant records on this issue--or any other issue that requires public release-- they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.
In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."
After an explosive line of questioning by Sen. Patrick Leah (D-Vt.) during the second day of hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, progressive groups are calling on Democrats on the GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee to read documents now labelled as "committee confidential" into the public record as a way to expose the possibility that the nominee may have knowingly received stolen emails ahead of previous sworn testimony before Congress.
"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :
Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.
Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.
Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.
Watch part the key part of their exchange:
\u201c\ud83d\udea8LEAHY: When you worked at the WH, did anyone ever tell you they had a mole that provided them with secret info? \n\nKAVANAUGH: I don't recall\n\nL: You never received an email from a GOP staff member w/info claiming to come from spying? \n\nK: I'm not going to rule anything out. \ud83d\udea8\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1536158174
In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups--namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America--jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.
\u201cBoth Sens Hatch & Grassley continue to speak as though they don\u2019t understand Leahy\u2019s request. Leahy cannot present the evidence to Kavanaugh at the hearing b/c they have been designated \u201cCommittee Confidential.\u201dCall yr Sen. Tell Grassley to allow the public release of these docs.\u201d— Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sherrilyn Ifill) 1536177282
In a statement, the groups declared:
Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy's questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared "Committee Confidential" include emails that are highly relevant--and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh's knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.
Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents "Committee Confidential" or prohibit their public release.
If there are relevant records on this issue--or any other issue that requires public release-- they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.
In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."