SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill, June 5, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
'Revolting': Betsy DeVos Unveils Proposal to Make It Harder for Students Defrauded by Predatory Schools to Get Loan Relief
Plan slammed as looking "more like a roadmap for institutions seeking to abuse students and avoid accountability and transparency rather than a plan to protect students and taxpayers."
Jul 25, 2018
In a development critics deemed a sign of the administration once again serving corporate interests, Trump's Education Department, headed by billionaire Betsy Devos, on Wednesday rolled out a proposal that would make it harder for students defrauded by for-profit colleges to be given debt relief.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D-Mass.) response to the proposed changes to unimplemented Obama-era rules was unambiguous: "Revolting," she tweeted.
Under the new plan, which would take effect July 1, 2019, as the Associated Press explains,
students would be eligible for loan relief if they can prove their schools knowingly misled them with statements or actions that directly led them to take out loans or enroll at the school.
That would be a higher bar than rules finalized under Obama in 2016 after the collapse of two for-profit schools, Corinthian Colleges and ITT Technical Institute. Those rules allowed relief in a wider range of cases dealing with breach of contract.
Another key change that critics took aim at is that the new plan would help institutions evade responsibility by preventing students from banding together to sue the school, instead forcing them into arbitration agreements.
Given the potential impact on debt-burdened students, Warren was far from alone in decrying the proposal.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, for example, argued that it would "let predatory schools cheat their students and enrich their executives."
"The Trump administration's proposed rule is callous to the thousands of students harmed by an industry concerned only with its bottom line," said Julie Murray, an attorney with Public Citizen.
"Students must be able to hold predatory schools accountable in court for fraud and misrepresentation. Instead," Murray continued, "the proposed rule announced today would help predatory schools evade liability while cutting off federal loan relief to students who can ill afford it. Make no mistake about it: This proposed rule tells predatory schools that crime pays."
According to Ashley Harrington, policy counsel with the Center for Responsible Lending, the "proposed draft reads more like a roadmap for institutions seeking to abuse students and avoid accountability and transparency rather than a plan to protect students and taxpayers."
The 2016 Borrower Defense rule, she said, "was created to protect students and taxpayers from deceptive practices like that of ITT Tech and Corinthian Colleges that abruptly closed their doors after widespread abuses put them on the brink of bankruptcy and jeopardized the futures of thousands of students. This proposal shortchanges borrowers and will only inflate the growing $1.5 billion student loan debt crisis."
The top Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, had harsh words for the proposal as well.
"Under the leadership of Secretary DeVos, the Trump administration is sending an alarming message: Schools can cheat [their] student borrowers and still reap the rewards of federal student aid," he said.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a development critics deemed a sign of the administration once again serving corporate interests, Trump's Education Department, headed by billionaire Betsy Devos, on Wednesday rolled out a proposal that would make it harder for students defrauded by for-profit colleges to be given debt relief.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D-Mass.) response to the proposed changes to unimplemented Obama-era rules was unambiguous: "Revolting," she tweeted.
Under the new plan, which would take effect July 1, 2019, as the Associated Press explains,
students would be eligible for loan relief if they can prove their schools knowingly misled them with statements or actions that directly led them to take out loans or enroll at the school.
That would be a higher bar than rules finalized under Obama in 2016 after the collapse of two for-profit schools, Corinthian Colleges and ITT Technical Institute. Those rules allowed relief in a wider range of cases dealing with breach of contract.
Another key change that critics took aim at is that the new plan would help institutions evade responsibility by preventing students from banding together to sue the school, instead forcing them into arbitration agreements.
Given the potential impact on debt-burdened students, Warren was far from alone in decrying the proposal.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, for example, argued that it would "let predatory schools cheat their students and enrich their executives."
"The Trump administration's proposed rule is callous to the thousands of students harmed by an industry concerned only with its bottom line," said Julie Murray, an attorney with Public Citizen.
"Students must be able to hold predatory schools accountable in court for fraud and misrepresentation. Instead," Murray continued, "the proposed rule announced today would help predatory schools evade liability while cutting off federal loan relief to students who can ill afford it. Make no mistake about it: This proposed rule tells predatory schools that crime pays."
According to Ashley Harrington, policy counsel with the Center for Responsible Lending, the "proposed draft reads more like a roadmap for institutions seeking to abuse students and avoid accountability and transparency rather than a plan to protect students and taxpayers."
The 2016 Borrower Defense rule, she said, "was created to protect students and taxpayers from deceptive practices like that of ITT Tech and Corinthian Colleges that abruptly closed their doors after widespread abuses put them on the brink of bankruptcy and jeopardized the futures of thousands of students. This proposal shortchanges borrowers and will only inflate the growing $1.5 billion student loan debt crisis."
The top Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, had harsh words for the proposal as well.
"Under the leadership of Secretary DeVos, the Trump administration is sending an alarming message: Schools can cheat [their] student borrowers and still reap the rewards of federal student aid," he said.
In a development critics deemed a sign of the administration once again serving corporate interests, Trump's Education Department, headed by billionaire Betsy Devos, on Wednesday rolled out a proposal that would make it harder for students defrauded by for-profit colleges to be given debt relief.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D-Mass.) response to the proposed changes to unimplemented Obama-era rules was unambiguous: "Revolting," she tweeted.
Under the new plan, which would take effect July 1, 2019, as the Associated Press explains,
students would be eligible for loan relief if they can prove their schools knowingly misled them with statements or actions that directly led them to take out loans or enroll at the school.
That would be a higher bar than rules finalized under Obama in 2016 after the collapse of two for-profit schools, Corinthian Colleges and ITT Technical Institute. Those rules allowed relief in a wider range of cases dealing with breach of contract.
Another key change that critics took aim at is that the new plan would help institutions evade responsibility by preventing students from banding together to sue the school, instead forcing them into arbitration agreements.
Given the potential impact on debt-burdened students, Warren was far from alone in decrying the proposal.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, for example, argued that it would "let predatory schools cheat their students and enrich their executives."
"The Trump administration's proposed rule is callous to the thousands of students harmed by an industry concerned only with its bottom line," said Julie Murray, an attorney with Public Citizen.
"Students must be able to hold predatory schools accountable in court for fraud and misrepresentation. Instead," Murray continued, "the proposed rule announced today would help predatory schools evade liability while cutting off federal loan relief to students who can ill afford it. Make no mistake about it: This proposed rule tells predatory schools that crime pays."
According to Ashley Harrington, policy counsel with the Center for Responsible Lending, the "proposed draft reads more like a roadmap for institutions seeking to abuse students and avoid accountability and transparency rather than a plan to protect students and taxpayers."
The 2016 Borrower Defense rule, she said, "was created to protect students and taxpayers from deceptive practices like that of ITT Tech and Corinthian Colleges that abruptly closed their doors after widespread abuses put them on the brink of bankruptcy and jeopardized the futures of thousands of students. This proposal shortchanges borrowers and will only inflate the growing $1.5 billion student loan debt crisis."
The top Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, had harsh words for the proposal as well.
"Under the leadership of Secretary DeVos, the Trump administration is sending an alarming message: Schools can cheat [their] student borrowers and still reap the rewards of federal student aid," he said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy