
U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman on stage during the opening of the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem on May 14, 2018 in Jerusalem, Israel. (Photo: Lior Mizrahi/Getty Images,)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman on stage during the opening of the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem on May 14, 2018 in Jerusalem, Israel. (Photo: Lior Mizrahi/Getty Images,)
U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman has a message for journalists who dare to report the truth about Israel's ongoing massacre of nonviolent demonstrators in Gaza: "Keep your mouths shut."
Friedman's "anti-democratic demand" came during his speech at a media conference in Jerusalem on Monday, in which he complained without evidence that "nine out of ten articles that are written about the Gaza conflict are critical of Israel."
"Just keep your mouths shut until you figure it out," Friedman told reporters. "Because otherwise, all you're doing is creating impressions that have no basis in fact. They fit a narrative. They fit an opinion. They fit an agenda. But it's not reporting, because it's not based on hard, factual analysis."
\u201cFriedman's stream of inappropriate comments rolls along. This time, it's an anti-democratic demand for journalists to "keep [their] mouths shut."\n\nhttps://t.co/ovUTLOhFf5\u201d— J Street (@J Street) 1528142145
While Friedman insisted that the media, and the U.S. media in particular, was biased against Israel in its coverage of the Israeli military's murder of over 60 unarmed Palestinian protesters last month--a massacre that prompted a U.N. war crimes probe--independent analysts have come to the precise opposite conclusion.
Citing a example passages from the New York Times, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, and several other major news sources, Gregory Shupak argued in an analysis for Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) last month that American corporate outlets almost invariably take Israel's side while effectively "blaming Palestinians for their own slaughter."
"Based on media coverage," wrote Shupak, "readers could be forgiven for concluding that it was Palestinians, not Israel, who carried out what Doctors Without Borders called 'unacceptable and inhuman' violence."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman has a message for journalists who dare to report the truth about Israel's ongoing massacre of nonviolent demonstrators in Gaza: "Keep your mouths shut."
Friedman's "anti-democratic demand" came during his speech at a media conference in Jerusalem on Monday, in which he complained without evidence that "nine out of ten articles that are written about the Gaza conflict are critical of Israel."
"Just keep your mouths shut until you figure it out," Friedman told reporters. "Because otherwise, all you're doing is creating impressions that have no basis in fact. They fit a narrative. They fit an opinion. They fit an agenda. But it's not reporting, because it's not based on hard, factual analysis."
\u201cFriedman's stream of inappropriate comments rolls along. This time, it's an anti-democratic demand for journalists to "keep [their] mouths shut."\n\nhttps://t.co/ovUTLOhFf5\u201d— J Street (@J Street) 1528142145
While Friedman insisted that the media, and the U.S. media in particular, was biased against Israel in its coverage of the Israeli military's murder of over 60 unarmed Palestinian protesters last month--a massacre that prompted a U.N. war crimes probe--independent analysts have come to the precise opposite conclusion.
Citing a example passages from the New York Times, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, and several other major news sources, Gregory Shupak argued in an analysis for Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) last month that American corporate outlets almost invariably take Israel's side while effectively "blaming Palestinians for their own slaughter."
"Based on media coverage," wrote Shupak, "readers could be forgiven for concluding that it was Palestinians, not Israel, who carried out what Doctors Without Borders called 'unacceptable and inhuman' violence."
U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman has a message for journalists who dare to report the truth about Israel's ongoing massacre of nonviolent demonstrators in Gaza: "Keep your mouths shut."
Friedman's "anti-democratic demand" came during his speech at a media conference in Jerusalem on Monday, in which he complained without evidence that "nine out of ten articles that are written about the Gaza conflict are critical of Israel."
"Just keep your mouths shut until you figure it out," Friedman told reporters. "Because otherwise, all you're doing is creating impressions that have no basis in fact. They fit a narrative. They fit an opinion. They fit an agenda. But it's not reporting, because it's not based on hard, factual analysis."
\u201cFriedman's stream of inappropriate comments rolls along. This time, it's an anti-democratic demand for journalists to "keep [their] mouths shut."\n\nhttps://t.co/ovUTLOhFf5\u201d— J Street (@J Street) 1528142145
While Friedman insisted that the media, and the U.S. media in particular, was biased against Israel in its coverage of the Israeli military's murder of over 60 unarmed Palestinian protesters last month--a massacre that prompted a U.N. war crimes probe--independent analysts have come to the precise opposite conclusion.
Citing a example passages from the New York Times, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, and several other major news sources, Gregory Shupak argued in an analysis for Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) last month that American corporate outlets almost invariably take Israel's side while effectively "blaming Palestinians for their own slaughter."
"Based on media coverage," wrote Shupak, "readers could be forgiven for concluding that it was Palestinians, not Israel, who carried out what Doctors Without Borders called 'unacceptable and inhuman' violence."