President Donald Trump's lead attorney Rudy Giuliani said on Sunday morning that the commander-in-chief "probably does" have the power to pardon himself. (Photo: Screenshot/ABC News)
Jun 03, 2018
"If the President decided he was going to pardon himself, that's almost self-executing impeachment." --Preet Bhahara, former federal prosecutor"He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn't say he can't."
That's what President Donald Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani claimed Sunday morning on ABC's "This Week" after he was asked directly by host George Stephanopoulos if the president's current legal team believes the president has the power to pardon himself.
Watch:
\u201cJUST IN: Does Pres. Trump have the power to pardon himself?\n\n"He's not, but he probably does," Rudy Giuliani tells @GStephanopoulos. "He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn't say he can't." https://t.co/IEUEWnjQqe #ThisWeek\u201d— This Week (@This Week) 1528030226
The question came in the wake of a leaked legal memo Trump's lawyers sent to Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller earlier this year--obtained by the New York Timesand published on Saturday--which stated their belief that Trump cannot be charged with obstruction of justice and retains sweeping pardon powers when it comes to all federal prosecutions, including ones for which even the president himself might be a subject.
Responding to Giuliani's comments, former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara toldCNN's Dana Bash that "If the President decided he was going to pardon himself, that's almost self-executing impeachment."
And Renato Mariotti, another former federal prosecutor, retorted, "If this sounds like tyranny to you, that's because it is."
\u201cTrump\u2019s team not only argues that he can pardon himself but also argues that he has unlimited power to investigate his enemies and end investigations into his friends. If this sounds like tyranny to you, that\u2019s because it is. https://t.co/1dWv8OG04X\u201d— Renato Mariotti (@Renato Mariotti) 1528031183
In a column on Sunday morning, Vox's Matthew Yglesias characterized the memo from Trump's legal team as "a recipe for tyranny" and a "clear and present danger to the rule of law."
Though it's clear this claim of far-reaching presidential authority has specific implications for the ongoing Mueller probe, Yglesias says the implications go much further than that:
One of the main purposes of the government is to protect the weak from exploitation at the hands of the strong by making certain forms of misconduct illegal. Trump's assertion that he can simply waive-away investigations into misconduct because he is worried that the investigation might end badly for his friends or family members is toxic to that entire scheme. Trump, like most presidents, has plenty of rich and powerful friends and a much longer list of rich and powerful people who would like to be his friends.
And if Trump, he concludes, "really does have the power to just make anyone's legal trouble go away because he happens to feel like it, then we're all in a world of trouble."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"If the President decided he was going to pardon himself, that's almost self-executing impeachment." --Preet Bhahara, former federal prosecutor"He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn't say he can't."
That's what President Donald Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani claimed Sunday morning on ABC's "This Week" after he was asked directly by host George Stephanopoulos if the president's current legal team believes the president has the power to pardon himself.
Watch:
\u201cJUST IN: Does Pres. Trump have the power to pardon himself?\n\n"He's not, but he probably does," Rudy Giuliani tells @GStephanopoulos. "He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn't say he can't." https://t.co/IEUEWnjQqe #ThisWeek\u201d— This Week (@This Week) 1528030226
The question came in the wake of a leaked legal memo Trump's lawyers sent to Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller earlier this year--obtained by the New York Timesand published on Saturday--which stated their belief that Trump cannot be charged with obstruction of justice and retains sweeping pardon powers when it comes to all federal prosecutions, including ones for which even the president himself might be a subject.
Responding to Giuliani's comments, former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara toldCNN's Dana Bash that "If the President decided he was going to pardon himself, that's almost self-executing impeachment."
And Renato Mariotti, another former federal prosecutor, retorted, "If this sounds like tyranny to you, that's because it is."
\u201cTrump\u2019s team not only argues that he can pardon himself but also argues that he has unlimited power to investigate his enemies and end investigations into his friends. If this sounds like tyranny to you, that\u2019s because it is. https://t.co/1dWv8OG04X\u201d— Renato Mariotti (@Renato Mariotti) 1528031183
In a column on Sunday morning, Vox's Matthew Yglesias characterized the memo from Trump's legal team as "a recipe for tyranny" and a "clear and present danger to the rule of law."
Though it's clear this claim of far-reaching presidential authority has specific implications for the ongoing Mueller probe, Yglesias says the implications go much further than that:
One of the main purposes of the government is to protect the weak from exploitation at the hands of the strong by making certain forms of misconduct illegal. Trump's assertion that he can simply waive-away investigations into misconduct because he is worried that the investigation might end badly for his friends or family members is toxic to that entire scheme. Trump, like most presidents, has plenty of rich and powerful friends and a much longer list of rich and powerful people who would like to be his friends.
And if Trump, he concludes, "really does have the power to just make anyone's legal trouble go away because he happens to feel like it, then we're all in a world of trouble."
"If the President decided he was going to pardon himself, that's almost self-executing impeachment." --Preet Bhahara, former federal prosecutor"He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn't say he can't."
That's what President Donald Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani claimed Sunday morning on ABC's "This Week" after he was asked directly by host George Stephanopoulos if the president's current legal team believes the president has the power to pardon himself.
Watch:
\u201cJUST IN: Does Pres. Trump have the power to pardon himself?\n\n"He's not, but he probably does," Rudy Giuliani tells @GStephanopoulos. "He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn't say he can't." https://t.co/IEUEWnjQqe #ThisWeek\u201d— This Week (@This Week) 1528030226
The question came in the wake of a leaked legal memo Trump's lawyers sent to Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller earlier this year--obtained by the New York Timesand published on Saturday--which stated their belief that Trump cannot be charged with obstruction of justice and retains sweeping pardon powers when it comes to all federal prosecutions, including ones for which even the president himself might be a subject.
Responding to Giuliani's comments, former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara toldCNN's Dana Bash that "If the President decided he was going to pardon himself, that's almost self-executing impeachment."
And Renato Mariotti, another former federal prosecutor, retorted, "If this sounds like tyranny to you, that's because it is."
\u201cTrump\u2019s team not only argues that he can pardon himself but also argues that he has unlimited power to investigate his enemies and end investigations into his friends. If this sounds like tyranny to you, that\u2019s because it is. https://t.co/1dWv8OG04X\u201d— Renato Mariotti (@Renato Mariotti) 1528031183
In a column on Sunday morning, Vox's Matthew Yglesias characterized the memo from Trump's legal team as "a recipe for tyranny" and a "clear and present danger to the rule of law."
Though it's clear this claim of far-reaching presidential authority has specific implications for the ongoing Mueller probe, Yglesias says the implications go much further than that:
One of the main purposes of the government is to protect the weak from exploitation at the hands of the strong by making certain forms of misconduct illegal. Trump's assertion that he can simply waive-away investigations into misconduct because he is worried that the investigation might end badly for his friends or family members is toxic to that entire scheme. Trump, like most presidents, has plenty of rich and powerful friends and a much longer list of rich and powerful people who would like to be his friends.
And if Trump, he concludes, "really does have the power to just make anyone's legal trouble go away because he happens to feel like it, then we're all in a world of trouble."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.