SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
After carrying out its airstrikes--which reportedly sent 70 missiles careening into Syria--Israel claimed it is "not looking to escalate" tensions in the region. (Photo: AP)
Threat of Larger War Soars as Israel Claims Credit for Massive Attack on "Iranian Targets" in Syria
Syrian government denounced the Israeli bombing campaign as "aggressive conduct" that "will lead to nothing but an increase in tensions in the region"
May 10, 2018
Dramatically escalating the risk of an all-out regional war in the aftermath of U.S. President Donald Trump's violation of the Iran nuclear accord, Israel launched an "extensive" bombing campaign against what it claimed were Iranian targets in Syria early Thursday and warned the Syrian government that it will face "dire consequences" if it dares to respond.
"So I guess all the major western media outlets are going to push the Israeli line about iran firing at Israel without first verifying? Maybe just reprint IDF press releases to save time. You guys are gonna help start a war at this rate."
--Rania Khalek, independent journalist
"We hit nearly all the Iranian infrastructure in Syria," Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman asserted at a security conference following Thursday's morning airstrikes. "They need to remember the saying that if it rains on us, it'll storm on them. I hope we've finished this episode and everyone understood."
The Syrian foreign ministry, meanwhile, denounced the Israeli bombing campaign as step toward "direct confrontation" that "indicates the start of a new phase of aggression."
"This aggressive conduct by the Zionist entity...will lead to nothing but an increase in tensions in the region," one government official said, according to Syrian state news agency SANA.
While Western corporate media coverage of the bombardment and the responses of European nations have framed the Israeli bombing campaign as a "response" to an alleged Iranian missile attack from Syria, independent journalists and experts were quick to note that Israel attacked first with missile strikes on Tuesday--strikes some argued were aimed at provoking a reaction from Iranian forces.
Analysts also raised questions about the media's blind acceptance of Israel's claim that it was Iranian forces that fired missiles at the occupied Golan Heights, pointing to claims by Syrian officials that it was their own army that fired the missiles in response to Israel's earlier attack.
In a series of tweets late Wednesday as reports of Israel's bombing campaign began to swirl, National Iranian Council president Trita Parsi argued that Trump's decision to violate the nuclear deal and level new threats against Iran may be viewed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a "green light" to attempt to "provoke an Iranian response that will be used as a pretext for a wider war."
"Hence, the Israeli strikes in Syria are meant to trigger a larger war," Parsi wrote, laying out possible explanations for the ramped up bombing campaigns in Syria.
Robert Fisk, who has repeatedly challenged dominant U.S. media narratives on the Syrian civil war and other Middle East crises, argued in a column for The Independent on Thursday that the "latest overnight Israeli air strikes, supposedly at Iranian forces in Syria after a supposed Iranian rocket attack on Israeli forces in Golan--and it's important to use the 'supposed' and not take all this at face value--must have been known to the Americans in advance."
According to the Syrian government, the Israeli airstrikes killed three people and injured two, though a significant portion of the missiles were intercepted.
After carrying out its airstrikes--which reportedly sent 70 missiles careening into Syria--Israel claimed it is "not looking to escalate" tensions in the region.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Dramatically escalating the risk of an all-out regional war in the aftermath of U.S. President Donald Trump's violation of the Iran nuclear accord, Israel launched an "extensive" bombing campaign against what it claimed were Iranian targets in Syria early Thursday and warned the Syrian government that it will face "dire consequences" if it dares to respond.
"So I guess all the major western media outlets are going to push the Israeli line about iran firing at Israel without first verifying? Maybe just reprint IDF press releases to save time. You guys are gonna help start a war at this rate."
--Rania Khalek, independent journalist
"We hit nearly all the Iranian infrastructure in Syria," Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman asserted at a security conference following Thursday's morning airstrikes. "They need to remember the saying that if it rains on us, it'll storm on them. I hope we've finished this episode and everyone understood."
The Syrian foreign ministry, meanwhile, denounced the Israeli bombing campaign as step toward "direct confrontation" that "indicates the start of a new phase of aggression."
"This aggressive conduct by the Zionist entity...will lead to nothing but an increase in tensions in the region," one government official said, according to Syrian state news agency SANA.
While Western corporate media coverage of the bombardment and the responses of European nations have framed the Israeli bombing campaign as a "response" to an alleged Iranian missile attack from Syria, independent journalists and experts were quick to note that Israel attacked first with missile strikes on Tuesday--strikes some argued were aimed at provoking a reaction from Iranian forces.
Analysts also raised questions about the media's blind acceptance of Israel's claim that it was Iranian forces that fired missiles at the occupied Golan Heights, pointing to claims by Syrian officials that it was their own army that fired the missiles in response to Israel's earlier attack.
In a series of tweets late Wednesday as reports of Israel's bombing campaign began to swirl, National Iranian Council president Trita Parsi argued that Trump's decision to violate the nuclear deal and level new threats against Iran may be viewed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a "green light" to attempt to "provoke an Iranian response that will be used as a pretext for a wider war."
"Hence, the Israeli strikes in Syria are meant to trigger a larger war," Parsi wrote, laying out possible explanations for the ramped up bombing campaigns in Syria.
Robert Fisk, who has repeatedly challenged dominant U.S. media narratives on the Syrian civil war and other Middle East crises, argued in a column for The Independent on Thursday that the "latest overnight Israeli air strikes, supposedly at Iranian forces in Syria after a supposed Iranian rocket attack on Israeli forces in Golan--and it's important to use the 'supposed' and not take all this at face value--must have been known to the Americans in advance."
According to the Syrian government, the Israeli airstrikes killed three people and injured two, though a significant portion of the missiles were intercepted.
After carrying out its airstrikes--which reportedly sent 70 missiles careening into Syria--Israel claimed it is "not looking to escalate" tensions in the region.
Dramatically escalating the risk of an all-out regional war in the aftermath of U.S. President Donald Trump's violation of the Iran nuclear accord, Israel launched an "extensive" bombing campaign against what it claimed were Iranian targets in Syria early Thursday and warned the Syrian government that it will face "dire consequences" if it dares to respond.
"So I guess all the major western media outlets are going to push the Israeli line about iran firing at Israel without first verifying? Maybe just reprint IDF press releases to save time. You guys are gonna help start a war at this rate."
--Rania Khalek, independent journalist
"We hit nearly all the Iranian infrastructure in Syria," Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman asserted at a security conference following Thursday's morning airstrikes. "They need to remember the saying that if it rains on us, it'll storm on them. I hope we've finished this episode and everyone understood."
The Syrian foreign ministry, meanwhile, denounced the Israeli bombing campaign as step toward "direct confrontation" that "indicates the start of a new phase of aggression."
"This aggressive conduct by the Zionist entity...will lead to nothing but an increase in tensions in the region," one government official said, according to Syrian state news agency SANA.
While Western corporate media coverage of the bombardment and the responses of European nations have framed the Israeli bombing campaign as a "response" to an alleged Iranian missile attack from Syria, independent journalists and experts were quick to note that Israel attacked first with missile strikes on Tuesday--strikes some argued were aimed at provoking a reaction from Iranian forces.
Analysts also raised questions about the media's blind acceptance of Israel's claim that it was Iranian forces that fired missiles at the occupied Golan Heights, pointing to claims by Syrian officials that it was their own army that fired the missiles in response to Israel's earlier attack.
In a series of tweets late Wednesday as reports of Israel's bombing campaign began to swirl, National Iranian Council president Trita Parsi argued that Trump's decision to violate the nuclear deal and level new threats against Iran may be viewed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a "green light" to attempt to "provoke an Iranian response that will be used as a pretext for a wider war."
"Hence, the Israeli strikes in Syria are meant to trigger a larger war," Parsi wrote, laying out possible explanations for the ramped up bombing campaigns in Syria.
Robert Fisk, who has repeatedly challenged dominant U.S. media narratives on the Syrian civil war and other Middle East crises, argued in a column for The Independent on Thursday that the "latest overnight Israeli air strikes, supposedly at Iranian forces in Syria after a supposed Iranian rocket attack on Israeli forces in Golan--and it's important to use the 'supposed' and not take all this at face value--must have been known to the Americans in advance."
According to the Syrian government, the Israeli airstrikes killed three people and injured two, though a significant portion of the missiles were intercepted.
After carrying out its airstrikes--which reportedly sent 70 missiles careening into Syria--Israel claimed it is "not looking to escalate" tensions in the region.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.