SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A federal judge dismissed a legal challenged to Massachusetts' 20-year-old law banning assault weapons, including AR-15s. (Photo: Mitch Barrie/Flickr/cc)
Upholding Assault Weapons Ban, Federal Judge Says Constitution Has Nothing To Say About Restricting the AR-15
"Strong gun laws save lives, and we will not be intimidated by the gun lobby in our efforts to end the sale of assault weapons and protect our communities and schools."
Apr 06, 2018
In the wake of fatal shootings in Florida and California that have fueled growing demands for stricter gun laws nationwide, a federal judge granted a victory to gun control advocates on Friday, upholding Massachusetts' ban on large-capacity magazines and assault weapons such as the AR-15, which has become the weapon of choice for U.S. mass shooters.
Dismissing a lawsuit filed by gun retailers and the Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, which sought to challenge the constitutionality of the state's 20-year-old law, U.S. District Judge William Young wrote (pdf) in a 47-page ruling, "The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to 'bear Arms.'"
"In the absence of federal legislation, Massachusetts is free to ban these weapons and large-capacity magazines. Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens. These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment," Young added. "Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous, and robust debate aboute these matters. We call it democracy."
The ruling, which could set a notable national precedent, was celebrated by gun control advocates:
"Today's decision upholding the Assault Weapons Ban vindicates the right of the people of Massachusetts to protect themselves from these weapons of war and my office's efforts to enforce the law," declared Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey.
"Strong gun laws save lives, and we will not be intimidated by the gun lobby in our efforts to end the sale of assault weapons and protect our communities and schools," she said. "Families across the country should take heart in this victory."
Young's ruling, as The Boston Globe noted, "also upheld Healey's decision in 2016 to notify gun sellers and manufacturers that the state would be 'cracking down' on the illegal sale of assault weapons, including those firearms that had been altered slightly to sidestep the ban."
The decision comes amid marches, town halls, and walkouts across the country to pressure policymakers to enact tougher restrictions on firearms, including bans similar to Massachusetts' law.
On Monday, Deerfield, Illinois--a suburb of Chicago--passed an ordinance that makes it illegal to possess, manufacture, or sell assault rifles and large capacity magazines, reportedly to "increase the public's sense of safety." CBS News reported that "anyone refusing to give up their banned firearm will be fined $1,000 a day until the weapon is handed over or removed from the town's limits."
In Boulder, Colorado on Thursday night, the city council unanimously passed a first reading of a similar ordinance. City officials will make a final decision on the measure at a future meeting.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the wake of fatal shootings in Florida and California that have fueled growing demands for stricter gun laws nationwide, a federal judge granted a victory to gun control advocates on Friday, upholding Massachusetts' ban on large-capacity magazines and assault weapons such as the AR-15, which has become the weapon of choice for U.S. mass shooters.
Dismissing a lawsuit filed by gun retailers and the Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, which sought to challenge the constitutionality of the state's 20-year-old law, U.S. District Judge William Young wrote (pdf) in a 47-page ruling, "The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to 'bear Arms.'"
"In the absence of federal legislation, Massachusetts is free to ban these weapons and large-capacity magazines. Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens. These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment," Young added. "Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous, and robust debate aboute these matters. We call it democracy."
The ruling, which could set a notable national precedent, was celebrated by gun control advocates:
"Today's decision upholding the Assault Weapons Ban vindicates the right of the people of Massachusetts to protect themselves from these weapons of war and my office's efforts to enforce the law," declared Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey.
"Strong gun laws save lives, and we will not be intimidated by the gun lobby in our efforts to end the sale of assault weapons and protect our communities and schools," she said. "Families across the country should take heart in this victory."
Young's ruling, as The Boston Globe noted, "also upheld Healey's decision in 2016 to notify gun sellers and manufacturers that the state would be 'cracking down' on the illegal sale of assault weapons, including those firearms that had been altered slightly to sidestep the ban."
The decision comes amid marches, town halls, and walkouts across the country to pressure policymakers to enact tougher restrictions on firearms, including bans similar to Massachusetts' law.
On Monday, Deerfield, Illinois--a suburb of Chicago--passed an ordinance that makes it illegal to possess, manufacture, or sell assault rifles and large capacity magazines, reportedly to "increase the public's sense of safety." CBS News reported that "anyone refusing to give up their banned firearm will be fined $1,000 a day until the weapon is handed over or removed from the town's limits."
In Boulder, Colorado on Thursday night, the city council unanimously passed a first reading of a similar ordinance. City officials will make a final decision on the measure at a future meeting.
In the wake of fatal shootings in Florida and California that have fueled growing demands for stricter gun laws nationwide, a federal judge granted a victory to gun control advocates on Friday, upholding Massachusetts' ban on large-capacity magazines and assault weapons such as the AR-15, which has become the weapon of choice for U.S. mass shooters.
Dismissing a lawsuit filed by gun retailers and the Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, which sought to challenge the constitutionality of the state's 20-year-old law, U.S. District Judge William Young wrote (pdf) in a 47-page ruling, "The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to 'bear Arms.'"
"In the absence of federal legislation, Massachusetts is free to ban these weapons and large-capacity magazines. Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens. These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment," Young added. "Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous, and robust debate aboute these matters. We call it democracy."
The ruling, which could set a notable national precedent, was celebrated by gun control advocates:
"Today's decision upholding the Assault Weapons Ban vindicates the right of the people of Massachusetts to protect themselves from these weapons of war and my office's efforts to enforce the law," declared Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey.
"Strong gun laws save lives, and we will not be intimidated by the gun lobby in our efforts to end the sale of assault weapons and protect our communities and schools," she said. "Families across the country should take heart in this victory."
Young's ruling, as The Boston Globe noted, "also upheld Healey's decision in 2016 to notify gun sellers and manufacturers that the state would be 'cracking down' on the illegal sale of assault weapons, including those firearms that had been altered slightly to sidestep the ban."
The decision comes amid marches, town halls, and walkouts across the country to pressure policymakers to enact tougher restrictions on firearms, including bans similar to Massachusetts' law.
On Monday, Deerfield, Illinois--a suburb of Chicago--passed an ordinance that makes it illegal to possess, manufacture, or sell assault rifles and large capacity magazines, reportedly to "increase the public's sense of safety." CBS News reported that "anyone refusing to give up their banned firearm will be fined $1,000 a day until the weapon is handed over or removed from the town's limits."
In Boulder, Colorado on Thursday night, the city council unanimously passed a first reading of a similar ordinance. City officials will make a final decision on the measure at a future meeting.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.