Critics of the CLOUD Act " are rightfully pointing out that it jettisons current human rights protections in favor of vague standards that could gut individual rights." (Photo: Electoric Frontier Foundation)
Mar 22, 2018
Buried in the 2,232-page omnibus spending bill that the U.S. House passed Thursday is a piece of legislation that digital privacy advocates warn "expands American and foreign law enforcement's ability to target and access people's data across international borders."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data or CLOUD Act (S. 2383 and H.R. 4943) would add an official provision for U.S. law enforcement to access "the contents of a wire or electronic communication and any record or other information" for people all across the globe, regardless of where they live and what that nation's privacy laws dictate. It would also create a "backdoor" into Americans' data, enabling the U.S. government to bypass its citizens' Fourth Amendment rights to access and even use their data.
Despite having no formal debate on the legislation and a flurry of urgent warnings early in the week about its attack on digital privacy rights and civil liberties, federal lawmakers revealed on Wednesday that their $1.3 trillion dollar spending bill (pdf) would include the CLOUD Act.
\u201cUNBELIEVABLE: Congress has attached the #CLOUDAct to the 2,232 page omnibus package the government must now pass by Friday. How many lawmakers will even know what they're voting for? This bill undermines our online privacy. SAY NO: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521678652
\u201cShockingly, the #CLOUDact, despite its dangers for human rights globally, has been attached to a 2000+ page "omnibus" bill, in order to get it through without debate in less than a week! \nHere is our letter to Congress: https://t.co/E2V6eL5FWl #whatdemocracy\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1521736075
As the spending bill heads to the Senate, which must pass it by the end of Friday to avert another government shutdown, digital privacy and civil liberties groups are urging senators to oppose the measure, warning that it could endanger activists, journalists, and others.
\u201cCPJ expresses its concerns with the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act and its potential to expose journalists to targeting by foreign governments. #CLOUDAct \nhttps://t.co/WcCGLk0oo8\u201d— CPJ Tech Program (@CPJ Tech Program) 1521738213
\u201cCongress is rushing to pass a 2,000+ page omnibus it released just last night. In it, they've snuck in the CLOUD Act which radically transforms the way cops get our data from tech companies & undermines our privacy (more: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H). Here are the #CLOUDAct sponsors:\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521738980
"The Department of Justice and major tech companies are actively supporting the bill, erroneously suggesting it will advance consumer rights," ACLU legislative counsel Neem Singh Guliani noted in an op-ed for The Hill this week. "Meanwhile, privacy and human rights organizations that have opposed the bill are rightfully pointing out that it jettisons current human rights protections in favor of vague standards that could gut individual rights."
"Congress should reject the CLOUD Act because it fails to protect human rights or Americans' privacy. But, even more, they should reject the CLOUD Act because it gives up their constitutional role, and gives far too much power to the attorney general, the secretary of state, the president, and foreign governments," he declared.
The CLOUD Act, as Guliani explained, gives "Attorney General Jeff Sessions and presumptive Secretary of State Mike Pompeo extensive and nearly unchecked power over global digital privacy rights" by empowering them "to enter into data exchange agreements with foreign governments without congressional approval." Tweeting on Wednesday, the ACLU posed a related question to Americans:
\u201cWho do you want to trust to protect your rights \u2014 Jeff Sessions or the Constitution? https://t.co/GHYpsrM6yG\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1521680133
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Buried in the 2,232-page omnibus spending bill that the U.S. House passed Thursday is a piece of legislation that digital privacy advocates warn "expands American and foreign law enforcement's ability to target and access people's data across international borders."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data or CLOUD Act (S. 2383 and H.R. 4943) would add an official provision for U.S. law enforcement to access "the contents of a wire or electronic communication and any record or other information" for people all across the globe, regardless of where they live and what that nation's privacy laws dictate. It would also create a "backdoor" into Americans' data, enabling the U.S. government to bypass its citizens' Fourth Amendment rights to access and even use their data.
Despite having no formal debate on the legislation and a flurry of urgent warnings early in the week about its attack on digital privacy rights and civil liberties, federal lawmakers revealed on Wednesday that their $1.3 trillion dollar spending bill (pdf) would include the CLOUD Act.
\u201cUNBELIEVABLE: Congress has attached the #CLOUDAct to the 2,232 page omnibus package the government must now pass by Friday. How many lawmakers will even know what they're voting for? This bill undermines our online privacy. SAY NO: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521678652
\u201cShockingly, the #CLOUDact, despite its dangers for human rights globally, has been attached to a 2000+ page "omnibus" bill, in order to get it through without debate in less than a week! \nHere is our letter to Congress: https://t.co/E2V6eL5FWl #whatdemocracy\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1521736075
As the spending bill heads to the Senate, which must pass it by the end of Friday to avert another government shutdown, digital privacy and civil liberties groups are urging senators to oppose the measure, warning that it could endanger activists, journalists, and others.
\u201cCPJ expresses its concerns with the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act and its potential to expose journalists to targeting by foreign governments. #CLOUDAct \nhttps://t.co/WcCGLk0oo8\u201d— CPJ Tech Program (@CPJ Tech Program) 1521738213
\u201cCongress is rushing to pass a 2,000+ page omnibus it released just last night. In it, they've snuck in the CLOUD Act which radically transforms the way cops get our data from tech companies & undermines our privacy (more: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H). Here are the #CLOUDAct sponsors:\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521738980
"The Department of Justice and major tech companies are actively supporting the bill, erroneously suggesting it will advance consumer rights," ACLU legislative counsel Neem Singh Guliani noted in an op-ed for The Hill this week. "Meanwhile, privacy and human rights organizations that have opposed the bill are rightfully pointing out that it jettisons current human rights protections in favor of vague standards that could gut individual rights."
"Congress should reject the CLOUD Act because it fails to protect human rights or Americans' privacy. But, even more, they should reject the CLOUD Act because it gives up their constitutional role, and gives far too much power to the attorney general, the secretary of state, the president, and foreign governments," he declared.
The CLOUD Act, as Guliani explained, gives "Attorney General Jeff Sessions and presumptive Secretary of State Mike Pompeo extensive and nearly unchecked power over global digital privacy rights" by empowering them "to enter into data exchange agreements with foreign governments without congressional approval." Tweeting on Wednesday, the ACLU posed a related question to Americans:
\u201cWho do you want to trust to protect your rights \u2014 Jeff Sessions or the Constitution? https://t.co/GHYpsrM6yG\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1521680133
Buried in the 2,232-page omnibus spending bill that the U.S. House passed Thursday is a piece of legislation that digital privacy advocates warn "expands American and foreign law enforcement's ability to target and access people's data across international borders."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data or CLOUD Act (S. 2383 and H.R. 4943) would add an official provision for U.S. law enforcement to access "the contents of a wire or electronic communication and any record or other information" for people all across the globe, regardless of where they live and what that nation's privacy laws dictate. It would also create a "backdoor" into Americans' data, enabling the U.S. government to bypass its citizens' Fourth Amendment rights to access and even use their data.
Despite having no formal debate on the legislation and a flurry of urgent warnings early in the week about its attack on digital privacy rights and civil liberties, federal lawmakers revealed on Wednesday that their $1.3 trillion dollar spending bill (pdf) would include the CLOUD Act.
\u201cUNBELIEVABLE: Congress has attached the #CLOUDAct to the 2,232 page omnibus package the government must now pass by Friday. How many lawmakers will even know what they're voting for? This bill undermines our online privacy. SAY NO: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521678652
\u201cShockingly, the #CLOUDact, despite its dangers for human rights globally, has been attached to a 2000+ page "omnibus" bill, in order to get it through without debate in less than a week! \nHere is our letter to Congress: https://t.co/E2V6eL5FWl #whatdemocracy\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1521736075
As the spending bill heads to the Senate, which must pass it by the end of Friday to avert another government shutdown, digital privacy and civil liberties groups are urging senators to oppose the measure, warning that it could endanger activists, journalists, and others.
\u201cCPJ expresses its concerns with the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act and its potential to expose journalists to targeting by foreign governments. #CLOUDAct \nhttps://t.co/WcCGLk0oo8\u201d— CPJ Tech Program (@CPJ Tech Program) 1521738213
\u201cCongress is rushing to pass a 2,000+ page omnibus it released just last night. In it, they've snuck in the CLOUD Act which radically transforms the way cops get our data from tech companies & undermines our privacy (more: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H). Here are the #CLOUDAct sponsors:\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521738980
"The Department of Justice and major tech companies are actively supporting the bill, erroneously suggesting it will advance consumer rights," ACLU legislative counsel Neem Singh Guliani noted in an op-ed for The Hill this week. "Meanwhile, privacy and human rights organizations that have opposed the bill are rightfully pointing out that it jettisons current human rights protections in favor of vague standards that could gut individual rights."
"Congress should reject the CLOUD Act because it fails to protect human rights or Americans' privacy. But, even more, they should reject the CLOUD Act because it gives up their constitutional role, and gives far too much power to the attorney general, the secretary of state, the president, and foreign governments," he declared.
The CLOUD Act, as Guliani explained, gives "Attorney General Jeff Sessions and presumptive Secretary of State Mike Pompeo extensive and nearly unchecked power over global digital privacy rights" by empowering them "to enter into data exchange agreements with foreign governments without congressional approval." Tweeting on Wednesday, the ACLU posed a related question to Americans:
\u201cWho do you want to trust to protect your rights \u2014 Jeff Sessions or the Constitution? https://t.co/GHYpsrM6yG\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1521680133
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.