Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Despite the perilous possibilities outlined by NTI and other experts, President Donald Trump is moving quickly to loosen constraints on the use of nuclear weapons, a decision several world leaders denounced earlier this month as a "dangerous" step that moves "humankind closer to annihilation." (Photo: Devin/Flickr/cc)

Ignoring Risks, Trump Moving to Modernize Ineffective and Potentially 'Catastrophic' Nukes

New analysis shows the B61 bombs the president plans to revamp are basically useless as deterrents and "increase the risk of accidents, blunders, or terrorism."

Jake Johnson

As the Trump administration barrels ahead with its aggressive nuclear agenda that includes dumping billions of dollars into upgrading the 150 B61 bombs positioned in Europe, a new report argues that these weapons are essentially useless as deterrents and a potentially "catastrophic" security threat.

Authored by the arms control advocacy group Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and viewed by the Guardian for the first time on Thursday, the report (pdf) highlights with alarm the Trump administration's decision to move ahead with efforts to "modernize" the B61 nukes in an effort to make them more accurate and versatile, which analysts worry will "increase the risk of nuclear use in a crisis."

These weapons—many of which are currently positioned just 70 miles from the Syrian border—also "increase the risk of accidents, blunders, or catastrophic terrorism and invite preemption," NTI's analysis notes. "Given these added risks, it is past time to revisit whether these forward-based weapons are essential for military deterrence and political reassurance."

Despite the perilous possibilities outlined by NTI and other experts, Trump is moving quickly to loosen constraints on the use of nuclear weapons, a decision several world leaders denounced earlier this month as a "dangerous" step that moves "humankind closer to annihilation."

In addition to heightening the risk of a devastating nuclear accident and even all-out war, modernizing the B61 nukes—a process that would replace the Cold War relic with the B61-12, "the U.S. arsenal's first guided nuclear gravity bomb"—would also come at an enormous financial cost.

"The cost of maintaining and modernizing U.S. nuclear forces is projected to cost $400 billion during the next 10 years and more than $1.2 trillion across 30 years," NTI notes. "Production of the B61-12 has already been delayed three years and has more than doubled in cost to nearly $10 billion."

President Donald Trump's aggressive push to expand America's nuclear arsenal comes at a time of soaring tensions between the U.S. and North Korea. Peace groups have warned repeatedly over the past several months that if diplomacy isn't pursued immediately, a "nuclear nightmare" could quickly break out.

Speaking with the Guardian on Thursday, nuclear physicist and former U.S. energy secretary Ernest Moniz echoed these concerns and said the possibility that a nuke could be deployed "is higher than it's been since the Cuban missile crisis."

"We know we've had those warnings many times in history and we've managed so far to dodge the bullet," Moniz, who is also the CEO and co-chairman of NTI, added. "But dodging the bullets is more difficult when there's not significant communications going on and a lot of tensions between the countries."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

Pentagon Contractors in Afghanistan Pocketed $108 Billion Over 20 Years

Military contracting "obscures where and how taxpayer money flows," and "makes it difficult to know how many people are employed, injured, and killed," said the Costs of War Project report's author.

Jessica Corbett ·

Fetterman Demands Dr. Oz Answer for $50,000 Tax Break Intended for Pa. Farmers

"Dr. Oz does not want to live in Pennsylvania, and he doesn't want to pay taxes here; he just wants our Senate seat."

Julia Conley ·

With Antitrust Bills Stalled, Watchdogs Demand Schumer Disclose Big Tech Donations

"His close association with tech execs is worrying," said the progressive advocacy group that led the call.

Jake Johnson ·

Over 800,000 Brazilians Sign Pro-Democracy Manifesto Amid Bolsonaro Coup Threat

"We face the risk of having to live through a dictatorship once again—and this is inconceivable," one of the proclamation's authors warned.

Brett Wilkins ·

Nebraska Abortion Ban 3 Votes Short Shows Why Midterms ‘Matter So Damn Much'

"Poll after poll has shown that a majority of Nebraskans support abortion rights," said the state's Democratic Party chair. "But there are radical Republican senators that will keep trying to erode reproductive rights."

Julia Conley ·

Common Dreams Logo