To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
A trading board on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) shows the closing numbers on February 5, 2018 in New York City. Following Fridays's over 600 point drop, the Dow Jones Industrial Average briefly fell over 1500 points in afternoon trading before closing down at 1,175.21 points. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Bucking the wisdom of his predecessors--who operated on the knowledge that stock prices go up and down, all for a variety of reasons--President Donald Trump has not been shy about taking personal credit for the recent highs of the stock market, but with Monday's historic drop on Wall Street the president has many people wondering if he'll take credit (or on who he'll cast the blame).
As USA Today reports:
Traditionally, presidents have avoided patting themselves on the back for Wall Street's highs, because they don't wish to be anchored down by its lows.
As Axel Merk, president of Merk Investments, said, "Let Trump take credit, but he'll also own it should the market ever tank."
"Trump hasn't just claimed that stocks are up because of him," CNN added, "he has argued without offering proof that they would have crashed if Hillary Clinton were president."
\u201cSeeing as how Trump loves to brag about the stock market doing well, I know he'll be a man of integrity and take an equal share of the responsibility when it doesn't (-1175, biggest single day drop ever). I haven't seen any tweets from him about it yet. Curious.\u201d— DarkMatter2525 (@DarkMatter2525) 1517878550
Across social media, as the Huffington Post cataloged, countless people were making that connection rather easily after Trump went conspicuously silent on Monday as the market tanked:
\u201cJust so I understand \u2014 We\u2019re supposed to give Donald Trump credit for the stock market *only* when it\u2019s going UP?\u201d— Dice \ud83c\udfb2 \ud83c\udf3b (@Dice \ud83c\udfb2 \ud83c\udf3b) 1517882795
According to the latest data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, only around 14 percent of all U.S. families directly own stocks or hold investments like mutual funds, which is why many astute economists issue the reminder in moments like these that "the stock market is not the economy."
On the other hand, the state of other stock indexes around the world on Tuesday--not to mention that investor jitters, inflation fears, and sell-offs can have real-world ramifications--makes it clear that there are impressive dynamics in the U.S. economy exerting pressure on the globalized system.
It is "too soon to tell" if the overall economy is heading for real trouble, wroteNew York Times columnist Paul Krugman on Tuesday.
"But if we are," he noted, citing Trump and the financial team he has assembled at the Fed and within his administration, "rest assured that we'll have the worst possible people on the case."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Bucking the wisdom of his predecessors--who operated on the knowledge that stock prices go up and down, all for a variety of reasons--President Donald Trump has not been shy about taking personal credit for the recent highs of the stock market, but with Monday's historic drop on Wall Street the president has many people wondering if he'll take credit (or on who he'll cast the blame).
As USA Today reports:
Traditionally, presidents have avoided patting themselves on the back for Wall Street's highs, because they don't wish to be anchored down by its lows.
As Axel Merk, president of Merk Investments, said, "Let Trump take credit, but he'll also own it should the market ever tank."
"Trump hasn't just claimed that stocks are up because of him," CNN added, "he has argued without offering proof that they would have crashed if Hillary Clinton were president."
\u201cSeeing as how Trump loves to brag about the stock market doing well, I know he'll be a man of integrity and take an equal share of the responsibility when it doesn't (-1175, biggest single day drop ever). I haven't seen any tweets from him about it yet. Curious.\u201d— DarkMatter2525 (@DarkMatter2525) 1517878550
Across social media, as the Huffington Post cataloged, countless people were making that connection rather easily after Trump went conspicuously silent on Monday as the market tanked:
\u201cJust so I understand \u2014 We\u2019re supposed to give Donald Trump credit for the stock market *only* when it\u2019s going UP?\u201d— Dice \ud83c\udfb2 \ud83c\udf3b (@Dice \ud83c\udfb2 \ud83c\udf3b) 1517882795
According to the latest data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, only around 14 percent of all U.S. families directly own stocks or hold investments like mutual funds, which is why many astute economists issue the reminder in moments like these that "the stock market is not the economy."
On the other hand, the state of other stock indexes around the world on Tuesday--not to mention that investor jitters, inflation fears, and sell-offs can have real-world ramifications--makes it clear that there are impressive dynamics in the U.S. economy exerting pressure on the globalized system.
It is "too soon to tell" if the overall economy is heading for real trouble, wroteNew York Times columnist Paul Krugman on Tuesday.
"But if we are," he noted, citing Trump and the financial team he has assembled at the Fed and within his administration, "rest assured that we'll have the worst possible people on the case."
Bucking the wisdom of his predecessors--who operated on the knowledge that stock prices go up and down, all for a variety of reasons--President Donald Trump has not been shy about taking personal credit for the recent highs of the stock market, but with Monday's historic drop on Wall Street the president has many people wondering if he'll take credit (or on who he'll cast the blame).
As USA Today reports:
Traditionally, presidents have avoided patting themselves on the back for Wall Street's highs, because they don't wish to be anchored down by its lows.
As Axel Merk, president of Merk Investments, said, "Let Trump take credit, but he'll also own it should the market ever tank."
"Trump hasn't just claimed that stocks are up because of him," CNN added, "he has argued without offering proof that they would have crashed if Hillary Clinton were president."
\u201cSeeing as how Trump loves to brag about the stock market doing well, I know he'll be a man of integrity and take an equal share of the responsibility when it doesn't (-1175, biggest single day drop ever). I haven't seen any tweets from him about it yet. Curious.\u201d— DarkMatter2525 (@DarkMatter2525) 1517878550
Across social media, as the Huffington Post cataloged, countless people were making that connection rather easily after Trump went conspicuously silent on Monday as the market tanked:
\u201cJust so I understand \u2014 We\u2019re supposed to give Donald Trump credit for the stock market *only* when it\u2019s going UP?\u201d— Dice \ud83c\udfb2 \ud83c\udf3b (@Dice \ud83c\udfb2 \ud83c\udf3b) 1517882795
According to the latest data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, only around 14 percent of all U.S. families directly own stocks or hold investments like mutual funds, which is why many astute economists issue the reminder in moments like these that "the stock market is not the economy."
On the other hand, the state of other stock indexes around the world on Tuesday--not to mention that investor jitters, inflation fears, and sell-offs can have real-world ramifications--makes it clear that there are impressive dynamics in the U.S. economy exerting pressure on the globalized system.
It is "too soon to tell" if the overall economy is heading for real trouble, wroteNew York Times columnist Paul Krugman on Tuesday.
"But if we are," he noted, citing Trump and the financial team he has assembled at the Fed and within his administration, "rest assured that we'll have the worst possible people on the case."
