Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

President Donald Trump presides over a meeting about immigration with Republican and Democrat members of Congress in the Cabinet Room at the White House January 9, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

'They Thought No One Would Notice': WH Transcript of Immigration Meeting Omitted Trump's Endorsement of 'Clean' DACA Fix

"Based on this, it's legitimate to question what other federal records they may have falsified when no one was looking."

Jake Johnson

During his hour-long immigration meeting with members of Congress on Tuesday, President Donald Trump contradicted his own previous positions and those of his party by suggesting that he "would like" to sign a "clean DACA bill." But you wouldn't know it if you relied on the White House's initial transcript of the meeting, which omitted—some would say "air-brushed"—the remark.

Perhaps, as former director of the Office of Government Ethics Walter Shaub suggested, White House staff left out the comment that so enraged the far-right in the hopes that "no one would notice." The problem, of course, is that the meeting was televised—and soon everyone noticed.

Trump's comment came during an exchange with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who asked the president if he would "be agreeable" to a "clean" bill to protect Dreamers that leaves out all of the conditions Trump and the Republican Party have previously demanded, like heightened "border security" and funding for a wall.

"Yeah, I would like—I would like to do that. Go ahead," Trump told Feinstein. "I think a lot of people would like to see that, but I think we have to do DACA first." (As the Washington Post's Aaron Blake notes, it is clear that Trump did not understand what a "clean" bill would entail.)

The original transcript of the meeting released by the White House on Tuesday left out the first half of the comment above, leaving in place only the last sentence.

Following a flood of backlash, the White House on Wednesday released an amended transcript—with the previously excluded comment inserted with an asterisk—and insisted that any omission was accidental.

Below are the two transcripts, with the initial version first:


Critics found this slip-up a bit too convenient, given that the comment in question ran counter to Trump's demands over the past several months and threatened to upend the plans of Republican immigration hawks.

"They thought no one would notice a corrupted transcript, got caught, looked up the Presidential Records Act, and quietly fixed it," Shaub concluded. "Based on this, it's legitimate to question what other federal records they may have falsified when no one was looking."

Others similarly raised suspicion about the omitted line:

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'No More Hiding': Sanders Says Make GOP Vote on Popular Policies

"The American people have a right to know where their senators stand on the most important issues impacting their lives."

Jake Johnson ·

Sanders Demands End to Medicare Premium Hike From Alzheimer's Drug

Biogen's original price for the controversial drug, he argues, "is the perfect example of why Medicare should be negotiating drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry."

Jessica Corbett ·

'Monumental Victory' as Biden Cancels Boundary Waters Mining Leases

Rep. Betty McCollum called the administration's decision "a rejection of the deeply flawed and politically motivated process under the Trump administration."

Brett Wilkins ·

Rights Groups Demand Hearings on the 'Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act'

"The longer Congress waits," warned one advocate, "the stronger and more dangerous this industry will become."

Kenny Stancil ·

Democrats Urge Biden to Abandon Dangerous Trump Policies on Nuclear Weapons

With the Nuclear Posture Review, say congressional lawmakers, the president can ensure "future generations can finally be free from the nuclear sword of Damocles that hangs over all our heads."

Andrea Germanos ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo