Jan 10, 2018
A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump's attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, but immigrant rights advocates warn the ruling is no cause for celebration, with long legal and legislative battles ahead.
San Francisco-based U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup ruled (pdf) on Tuesday night that the Trump administration's decision to rescind DACA--which granted work permits and relief from deportation to undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children--"was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance with law." He issued a nationwide injunction requiring the administration to immediately start accepting renewal applications again while his ruling makes its way through the federal courts.
Despite Alsup's decision, advocates remain concerned about the lack of a long-term solution. "This is not a win for us," Camille Mackler, the director of immigration legal policy at the advocacy group New York Immigration Coalition, explained to the New York Times. "We're obviously glad that this is going to provide some relief, but what we really need is a clean DREAM Act," or legislation that would make DACA protections permanent without adding enforcement measures that Trump and congressional Republicans are demanding.
\u201cWe are glad a judge recognized that Trump's decision to end DACA was based on cruelty and not fact. Unfortunately, the Trump administration is expected to appeal this decision. \n\nCongress needs to get Dreamers out of legal limbo by passing the Dream Act. https://t.co/HiPQc1a5Sp\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1515595241
While Democrats have been more supportive of the so-called Clean Dream Act--the solution that advocates want--Republican lawmakers and the president have said they will only support DACA legislation with concessions to increase immigration enforcement, including Trump's long-promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. In statements to the press and on social media this week, the president has maintained his position that a wall "must be part of any DACA approval."
Alsup's decision came only hours after a bipartisan meeting with lawmakers and Trump to discuss immigration legislation that would include protections for DACA recipients. Following the ruling, a spokesman for the Justice Department said in a statement that the agency will "continue to vigorously defend" Trump's position. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the ruling "outrageous," while the president turned to Twitter Wednesday morning to attack the 9th Circuit Court and Alsup's ruling.
\u201cIt just shows everyone how broken and unfair our Court System is when the opposing side in a case (such as DACA) always runs to the 9th Circuit and almost always wins before being reversed by higher courts.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1515593473
Meanwhile, advocates--who were also quick to note that the ruling could be overturned by a higher court--urged caution and called on lawmakers to keep up their efforts to pass legislative protections for Dreamers, a term inspired by the DREAM Act that's used to describe those who are eligible for the program.
\u201cThe ruling can still be halted by a higher court, so let\u2019s take this with caution. \n\u201cUnless halted by a higher... https://t.co/iteQqiRt4c\u201d— Mijente \ud83d\udc1c\ud83d\udc1c\ud83d\udc1c (@Mijente \ud83d\udc1c\ud83d\udc1c\ud83d\udc1c) 1515557978
\u201cJudge blocks termination of #DACA. Even the courts agree w/ protecting immigrant youth. Congress needs to get it together and pass #DreamActNow https://t.co/o4e02k5Kw6\u201d— Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella) (@Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella)) 1515560901
\u201cTo be clear de judge\u2019s decision on #DACA is ONLY symbolic. @realDonaldTrump killed DACA so join @UNITEDWEDREAM & demand for #DreamActNow\u201d— Julieta Garibay (@Julieta Garibay) 1515560523
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.