

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Activists participate in a protest in front of the White House October 12, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
In response to President Donald Trump's decertification of the Iran nuclear accord Friday, a coalition of grassroots organizations representing tens of millions of Americans slammed the White House's "reckless" decision to undermine an extremely successful and broadly popular diplomatic effort.
"If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war." --Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council"Let us be clear: Trump's decertification decision has no basis in reality, is without justification, and flies in the face of eight International Atomic Energy Agency compliance reports and expert opinion, including that of Trump's own national security team," the coalition--which includes Win Without War, Peace Action, MoveOn.org, and Indivisible--noted in a joint statement on Friday. "Trump's move will not only grievously undermine America's role in the world and its ability to conduct diplomacy writ large--and particularly with North Korea--but it could also leave Iran's nuclear program unconstrained, thereby setting the stage for further military conflict."
"Congress will now decide whether to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement," the coalition concluded. "Make no mistake: a vote to reimpose these sanctions is a vote to kill the JCPOA, and ultimately, a vote for war."
While Trump's announcement on Friday does not signify immediate changes to the nature of the nuclear agreement, commentators were quick to note that Trump is setting the stage for future sabotage of the deal by kicking the issue to the Republican-controlled Congress.
Analysts were also quick to note that the alternative path the Trump administration has suggested--which is summarized in a series of White House talking points that leaked ahead of the president's speech--more closely resembles a "cut-and-paste job from a poorly-written Wikipedia entry" than an actual strategy.
In a statement released ahead of Trump's speech Friday, Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, argued that no matter what "fancy words are used to describe the process" that follows the president's decertification of the accord, "in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word."
"This opens the door for Iran to respond in kind by also threatening to renege on its commitments lest the U.S. gives it additional concessions. This is a recipe for disaster," Parsi concluded. "If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In response to President Donald Trump's decertification of the Iran nuclear accord Friday, a coalition of grassroots organizations representing tens of millions of Americans slammed the White House's "reckless" decision to undermine an extremely successful and broadly popular diplomatic effort.
"If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war." --Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council"Let us be clear: Trump's decertification decision has no basis in reality, is without justification, and flies in the face of eight International Atomic Energy Agency compliance reports and expert opinion, including that of Trump's own national security team," the coalition--which includes Win Without War, Peace Action, MoveOn.org, and Indivisible--noted in a joint statement on Friday. "Trump's move will not only grievously undermine America's role in the world and its ability to conduct diplomacy writ large--and particularly with North Korea--but it could also leave Iran's nuclear program unconstrained, thereby setting the stage for further military conflict."
"Congress will now decide whether to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement," the coalition concluded. "Make no mistake: a vote to reimpose these sanctions is a vote to kill the JCPOA, and ultimately, a vote for war."
While Trump's announcement on Friday does not signify immediate changes to the nature of the nuclear agreement, commentators were quick to note that Trump is setting the stage for future sabotage of the deal by kicking the issue to the Republican-controlled Congress.
Analysts were also quick to note that the alternative path the Trump administration has suggested--which is summarized in a series of White House talking points that leaked ahead of the president's speech--more closely resembles a "cut-and-paste job from a poorly-written Wikipedia entry" than an actual strategy.
In a statement released ahead of Trump's speech Friday, Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, argued that no matter what "fancy words are used to describe the process" that follows the president's decertification of the accord, "in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word."
"This opens the door for Iran to respond in kind by also threatening to renege on its commitments lest the U.S. gives it additional concessions. This is a recipe for disaster," Parsi concluded. "If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war."
In response to President Donald Trump's decertification of the Iran nuclear accord Friday, a coalition of grassroots organizations representing tens of millions of Americans slammed the White House's "reckless" decision to undermine an extremely successful and broadly popular diplomatic effort.
"If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war." --Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council"Let us be clear: Trump's decertification decision has no basis in reality, is without justification, and flies in the face of eight International Atomic Energy Agency compliance reports and expert opinion, including that of Trump's own national security team," the coalition--which includes Win Without War, Peace Action, MoveOn.org, and Indivisible--noted in a joint statement on Friday. "Trump's move will not only grievously undermine America's role in the world and its ability to conduct diplomacy writ large--and particularly with North Korea--but it could also leave Iran's nuclear program unconstrained, thereby setting the stage for further military conflict."
"Congress will now decide whether to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement," the coalition concluded. "Make no mistake: a vote to reimpose these sanctions is a vote to kill the JCPOA, and ultimately, a vote for war."
While Trump's announcement on Friday does not signify immediate changes to the nature of the nuclear agreement, commentators were quick to note that Trump is setting the stage for future sabotage of the deal by kicking the issue to the Republican-controlled Congress.
Analysts were also quick to note that the alternative path the Trump administration has suggested--which is summarized in a series of White House talking points that leaked ahead of the president's speech--more closely resembles a "cut-and-paste job from a poorly-written Wikipedia entry" than an actual strategy.
In a statement released ahead of Trump's speech Friday, Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, argued that no matter what "fancy words are used to describe the process" that follows the president's decertification of the accord, "in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word."
"This opens the door for Iran to respond in kind by also threatening to renege on its commitments lest the U.S. gives it additional concessions. This is a recipe for disaster," Parsi concluded. "If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war."