Activists participate in a protest in front of the White House October 12, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Oct 13, 2017
In response to President Donald Trump's decertification of the Iran nuclear accord Friday, a coalition of grassroots organizations representing tens of millions of Americans slammed the White House's "reckless" decision to undermine an extremely successful and broadly popular diplomatic effort.
"If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war." --Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council"Let us be clear: Trump's decertification decision has no basis in reality, is without justification, and flies in the face of eight International Atomic Energy Agency compliance reports and expert opinion, including that of Trump's own national security team," the coalition--which includes Win Without War, Peace Action, MoveOn.org, and Indivisible--noted in a joint statement on Friday. "Trump's move will not only grievously undermine America's role in the world and its ability to conduct diplomacy writ large--and particularly with North Korea--but it could also leave Iran's nuclear program unconstrained, thereby setting the stage for further military conflict."
"Congress will now decide whether to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement," the coalition concluded. "Make no mistake: a vote to reimpose these sanctions is a vote to kill the JCPOA, and ultimately, a vote for war."
While Trump's announcement on Friday does not signify immediate changes to the nature of the nuclear agreement, commentators were quick to note that Trump is setting the stage for future sabotage of the deal by kicking the issue to the Republican-controlled Congress.
Analysts were also quick to note that the alternative path the Trump administration has suggested--which is summarized in a series of White House talking points that leaked ahead of the president's speech--more closely resembles a "cut-and-paste job from a poorly-written Wikipedia entry" than an actual strategy.
In a statement released ahead of Trump's speech Friday, Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, argued that no matter what "fancy words are used to describe the process" that follows the president's decertification of the accord, "in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word."
"This opens the door for Iran to respond in kind by also threatening to renege on its commitments lest the U.S. gives it additional concessions. This is a recipe for disaster," Parsi concluded. "If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In response to President Donald Trump's decertification of the Iran nuclear accord Friday, a coalition of grassroots organizations representing tens of millions of Americans slammed the White House's "reckless" decision to undermine an extremely successful and broadly popular diplomatic effort.
"If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war." --Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council"Let us be clear: Trump's decertification decision has no basis in reality, is without justification, and flies in the face of eight International Atomic Energy Agency compliance reports and expert opinion, including that of Trump's own national security team," the coalition--which includes Win Without War, Peace Action, MoveOn.org, and Indivisible--noted in a joint statement on Friday. "Trump's move will not only grievously undermine America's role in the world and its ability to conduct diplomacy writ large--and particularly with North Korea--but it could also leave Iran's nuclear program unconstrained, thereby setting the stage for further military conflict."
"Congress will now decide whether to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement," the coalition concluded. "Make no mistake: a vote to reimpose these sanctions is a vote to kill the JCPOA, and ultimately, a vote for war."
While Trump's announcement on Friday does not signify immediate changes to the nature of the nuclear agreement, commentators were quick to note that Trump is setting the stage for future sabotage of the deal by kicking the issue to the Republican-controlled Congress.
Analysts were also quick to note that the alternative path the Trump administration has suggested--which is summarized in a series of White House talking points that leaked ahead of the president's speech--more closely resembles a "cut-and-paste job from a poorly-written Wikipedia entry" than an actual strategy.
In a statement released ahead of Trump's speech Friday, Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, argued that no matter what "fancy words are used to describe the process" that follows the president's decertification of the accord, "in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word."
"This opens the door for Iran to respond in kind by also threatening to renege on its commitments lest the U.S. gives it additional concessions. This is a recipe for disaster," Parsi concluded. "If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war."
In response to President Donald Trump's decertification of the Iran nuclear accord Friday, a coalition of grassroots organizations representing tens of millions of Americans slammed the White House's "reckless" decision to undermine an extremely successful and broadly popular diplomatic effort.
"If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war." --Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council"Let us be clear: Trump's decertification decision has no basis in reality, is without justification, and flies in the face of eight International Atomic Energy Agency compliance reports and expert opinion, including that of Trump's own national security team," the coalition--which includes Win Without War, Peace Action, MoveOn.org, and Indivisible--noted in a joint statement on Friday. "Trump's move will not only grievously undermine America's role in the world and its ability to conduct diplomacy writ large--and particularly with North Korea--but it could also leave Iran's nuclear program unconstrained, thereby setting the stage for further military conflict."
"Congress will now decide whether to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement," the coalition concluded. "Make no mistake: a vote to reimpose these sanctions is a vote to kill the JCPOA, and ultimately, a vote for war."
While Trump's announcement on Friday does not signify immediate changes to the nature of the nuclear agreement, commentators were quick to note that Trump is setting the stage for future sabotage of the deal by kicking the issue to the Republican-controlled Congress.
Analysts were also quick to note that the alternative path the Trump administration has suggested--which is summarized in a series of White House talking points that leaked ahead of the president's speech--more closely resembles a "cut-and-paste job from a poorly-written Wikipedia entry" than an actual strategy.
In a statement released ahead of Trump's speech Friday, Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, argued that no matter what "fancy words are used to describe the process" that follows the president's decertification of the accord, "in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word."
"This opens the door for Iran to respond in kind by also threatening to renege on its commitments lest the U.S. gives it additional concessions. This is a recipe for disaster," Parsi concluded. "If the accord continues to unravel, the U.S. and Iran will be back on the path to war."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.