

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"There is a huge environmental risk to this storm," writes The New Republic's Emily Atkins. (Photo: NASA/Twitter)
Texas is bracing for potentially "catastrophic" flooding as Hurricane Harvey is set to make landfall Friday, and many are raising concerns that given the state's role as the heart of the petrochemical industry, the storm could create a "nightmare situation" for the environment--one that the Trump administration's aggressive deregulatory agenda will only make worse.
"This is an environmental justice issue."
--Judith Enck, former EPA administrator Writing for The New Republic, Emily Atkins highlights the devastating impact Hurricane Sandy--a Category 1 Hurricane--had in several states in 2012, and underlines the fact that Harvey now threatens as a Category 3 storm.
"In the devastating wake of Hurricane Sandy in 2012, parts of the East Coast were left not only demolished, but polluted," Atkins observes. Wastewater treatment plants lost power and discharged 11 billion gallons of sewage into receiving waters."
Harvey, environmentalists and researchers worry, could be even more devastating--"a huge pollution disaster," Atkins writes. As Reuters reported Friday, oil prices are beginning to surge as the petroleum industry prepares for the hurricane's impact.
Quoting former EPA administrator Judith Enck, Atkins continued:
There is a huge environmental risk to this storm. If the "biblical event" predicted materializes in this densely packed industrial area, "it may impact the Gulf Coast oil refineries and chemical plants," said Judith Enck, who served as administrator for EPA's Region 2 during Hurricane Sandy. "I am extremely concerned about the path of Hurricane Harvey."
Environmental advocates are also worried that Harvey will create long-term public health problems due to accidental toxic substance releases, and not just from refineries and power plants. In the 30 counties where a disaster has been declared, there are dozens of Superfund sites, many of which are essentially waste pits containing harmful chemicals.
"This is an environmental justice issue," Enck argued, underlining the fact that the storm will disproportionately affect low-income and minority communities.
"Even if the president can manage on Friday to curb his theatrics and focus on the storm of the decade, it's unlikely that an environmental disaster will be anywhere near the front of his mind."
--Emily Atkins, The New Republic
These risks are magnified by the Trump administration's deregulatory agenda, which has taken aim at environmental rules designed to protect the public from dangerous pollutants. Adding to these concerns is the fact that there are still numerous vacancies in federal agencies that will be tasked with confronting the hurricane's impact.
As the storm approached Texas Thursday and early Friday, Trump did not see fit to give it much attention, preferring instead to brag about what he views as his administration's achievements, which include the elimination of crucial environmental protections.
Atkins argued that "[e]ven if the president can manage on Friday to curb his theatrics and focus on the storm of the decade, it's unlikely that an environmental disaster will be anywhere near the front of his mind."
"The future impact of Trump's dismal policy agenda--which so far has increased the risk of environmental disaster without increasing disaster preparation--gives us something else to worry about," Atkins concluded.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Texas is bracing for potentially "catastrophic" flooding as Hurricane Harvey is set to make landfall Friday, and many are raising concerns that given the state's role as the heart of the petrochemical industry, the storm could create a "nightmare situation" for the environment--one that the Trump administration's aggressive deregulatory agenda will only make worse.
"This is an environmental justice issue."
--Judith Enck, former EPA administrator Writing for The New Republic, Emily Atkins highlights the devastating impact Hurricane Sandy--a Category 1 Hurricane--had in several states in 2012, and underlines the fact that Harvey now threatens as a Category 3 storm.
"In the devastating wake of Hurricane Sandy in 2012, parts of the East Coast were left not only demolished, but polluted," Atkins observes. Wastewater treatment plants lost power and discharged 11 billion gallons of sewage into receiving waters."
Harvey, environmentalists and researchers worry, could be even more devastating--"a huge pollution disaster," Atkins writes. As Reuters reported Friday, oil prices are beginning to surge as the petroleum industry prepares for the hurricane's impact.
Quoting former EPA administrator Judith Enck, Atkins continued:
There is a huge environmental risk to this storm. If the "biblical event" predicted materializes in this densely packed industrial area, "it may impact the Gulf Coast oil refineries and chemical plants," said Judith Enck, who served as administrator for EPA's Region 2 during Hurricane Sandy. "I am extremely concerned about the path of Hurricane Harvey."
Environmental advocates are also worried that Harvey will create long-term public health problems due to accidental toxic substance releases, and not just from refineries and power plants. In the 30 counties where a disaster has been declared, there are dozens of Superfund sites, many of which are essentially waste pits containing harmful chemicals.
"This is an environmental justice issue," Enck argued, underlining the fact that the storm will disproportionately affect low-income and minority communities.
"Even if the president can manage on Friday to curb his theatrics and focus on the storm of the decade, it's unlikely that an environmental disaster will be anywhere near the front of his mind."
--Emily Atkins, The New Republic
These risks are magnified by the Trump administration's deregulatory agenda, which has taken aim at environmental rules designed to protect the public from dangerous pollutants. Adding to these concerns is the fact that there are still numerous vacancies in federal agencies that will be tasked with confronting the hurricane's impact.
As the storm approached Texas Thursday and early Friday, Trump did not see fit to give it much attention, preferring instead to brag about what he views as his administration's achievements, which include the elimination of crucial environmental protections.
Atkins argued that "[e]ven if the president can manage on Friday to curb his theatrics and focus on the storm of the decade, it's unlikely that an environmental disaster will be anywhere near the front of his mind."
"The future impact of Trump's dismal policy agenda--which so far has increased the risk of environmental disaster without increasing disaster preparation--gives us something else to worry about," Atkins concluded.
Texas is bracing for potentially "catastrophic" flooding as Hurricane Harvey is set to make landfall Friday, and many are raising concerns that given the state's role as the heart of the petrochemical industry, the storm could create a "nightmare situation" for the environment--one that the Trump administration's aggressive deregulatory agenda will only make worse.
"This is an environmental justice issue."
--Judith Enck, former EPA administrator Writing for The New Republic, Emily Atkins highlights the devastating impact Hurricane Sandy--a Category 1 Hurricane--had in several states in 2012, and underlines the fact that Harvey now threatens as a Category 3 storm.
"In the devastating wake of Hurricane Sandy in 2012, parts of the East Coast were left not only demolished, but polluted," Atkins observes. Wastewater treatment plants lost power and discharged 11 billion gallons of sewage into receiving waters."
Harvey, environmentalists and researchers worry, could be even more devastating--"a huge pollution disaster," Atkins writes. As Reuters reported Friday, oil prices are beginning to surge as the petroleum industry prepares for the hurricane's impact.
Quoting former EPA administrator Judith Enck, Atkins continued:
There is a huge environmental risk to this storm. If the "biblical event" predicted materializes in this densely packed industrial area, "it may impact the Gulf Coast oil refineries and chemical plants," said Judith Enck, who served as administrator for EPA's Region 2 during Hurricane Sandy. "I am extremely concerned about the path of Hurricane Harvey."
Environmental advocates are also worried that Harvey will create long-term public health problems due to accidental toxic substance releases, and not just from refineries and power plants. In the 30 counties where a disaster has been declared, there are dozens of Superfund sites, many of which are essentially waste pits containing harmful chemicals.
"This is an environmental justice issue," Enck argued, underlining the fact that the storm will disproportionately affect low-income and minority communities.
"Even if the president can manage on Friday to curb his theatrics and focus on the storm of the decade, it's unlikely that an environmental disaster will be anywhere near the front of his mind."
--Emily Atkins, The New Republic
These risks are magnified by the Trump administration's deregulatory agenda, which has taken aim at environmental rules designed to protect the public from dangerous pollutants. Adding to these concerns is the fact that there are still numerous vacancies in federal agencies that will be tasked with confronting the hurricane's impact.
As the storm approached Texas Thursday and early Friday, Trump did not see fit to give it much attention, preferring instead to brag about what he views as his administration's achievements, which include the elimination of crucial environmental protections.
Atkins argued that "[e]ven if the president can manage on Friday to curb his theatrics and focus on the storm of the decade, it's unlikely that an environmental disaster will be anywhere near the front of his mind."
"The future impact of Trump's dismal policy agenda--which so far has increased the risk of environmental disaster without increasing disaster preparation--gives us something else to worry about," Atkins concluded.