

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

An image of the Larsen C ice shelf crack taken March 8, 2017. (Photo: O.V.E.R.V.I.E.W./flickr/cc)
Climate campaigners have a name proposed for a huge iceberg researchers say is about to break off from an ice shelf in Antarctica: the #ExxonKnew Iceberg.
The calving, as the break-off is called, is happening on the Larsen C ice shelf in West Antarctica. According to the U.K.-based Project Midas, which is keeping track of the rift's progress, it could be one of the largest icebergs on record.
According to 350.org, the soon-to-be Delaware-sized iceberg presents an excellent opportunity to remind the public of Exxon's role in fueling climate change.
"With one of the world's biggest ice shelves at a breaking point, this destruction should bear the name of its greatest perpetrator: Exxon," said Aaron Packard, 350.org's Climate Impact Coordinator. "People deserve to understand the devastation of Exxon's decades of climate deception, and realize fossil fuel companies for the climate criminals they are."
The group's petition to the U.S. National Ice Center--the body that names icebergs--says the fossil fuel company "deceived the public, misled their shareholders, and robbed humanity of a generation's worth of time to reverse climate change," referring to the ExxonKnew scandal.
"We need to make sure their role in causing the climate crisis is not forgotten," says the petition, which the group says has garnered over ten thousand signatures. 350.org also posted this video to accompany the petition:
Writing Friday, Project Midas said that "the iceberg remains attached to the shelf by a thin band of ice," adding: "When it calves, the Larsen C Ice Shelf will lose more than 10 percent of its area to leave the ice front at its most retreated position ever recorded; this event will fundamentally change the landscape of the Antarctic Peninsula."
Still, "we do not need to press the panic button for Larsen C," says Helen Amanda Fricker, a glaciologist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography:
Large calving events such as this are normal processes of a healthy ice sheet, ones that have occurred for decades, centuries, millennia--on cycles that are much longer than a human or satellite lifetime.
At the same time, she noted:
There is plenty going on that merits concern: Antarctic ice shelves overall are seeing accelerated thinning, and the ice sheet is losing mass in key sectors of Antarctica.
Added Jonathan Kingslake, an assistant professor at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory: "Warming on the Antarctic Peninsula is linked to human activity and probably triggered the collapse of two more northerly ice shelves." Larsen A and Larsen B collapsed in 1996 and 2002, respectively, after icebergs broke off.
As Packard sees it, "The Antarctic Peninsula is a window into a distressingly plausible, not-so-distant, future where the relatively stable climate the earth has thrived on enters meltdown mode. "
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Climate campaigners have a name proposed for a huge iceberg researchers say is about to break off from an ice shelf in Antarctica: the #ExxonKnew Iceberg.
The calving, as the break-off is called, is happening on the Larsen C ice shelf in West Antarctica. According to the U.K.-based Project Midas, which is keeping track of the rift's progress, it could be one of the largest icebergs on record.
According to 350.org, the soon-to-be Delaware-sized iceberg presents an excellent opportunity to remind the public of Exxon's role in fueling climate change.
"With one of the world's biggest ice shelves at a breaking point, this destruction should bear the name of its greatest perpetrator: Exxon," said Aaron Packard, 350.org's Climate Impact Coordinator. "People deserve to understand the devastation of Exxon's decades of climate deception, and realize fossil fuel companies for the climate criminals they are."
The group's petition to the U.S. National Ice Center--the body that names icebergs--says the fossil fuel company "deceived the public, misled their shareholders, and robbed humanity of a generation's worth of time to reverse climate change," referring to the ExxonKnew scandal.
"We need to make sure their role in causing the climate crisis is not forgotten," says the petition, which the group says has garnered over ten thousand signatures. 350.org also posted this video to accompany the petition:
Writing Friday, Project Midas said that "the iceberg remains attached to the shelf by a thin band of ice," adding: "When it calves, the Larsen C Ice Shelf will lose more than 10 percent of its area to leave the ice front at its most retreated position ever recorded; this event will fundamentally change the landscape of the Antarctic Peninsula."
Still, "we do not need to press the panic button for Larsen C," says Helen Amanda Fricker, a glaciologist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography:
Large calving events such as this are normal processes of a healthy ice sheet, ones that have occurred for decades, centuries, millennia--on cycles that are much longer than a human or satellite lifetime.
At the same time, she noted:
There is plenty going on that merits concern: Antarctic ice shelves overall are seeing accelerated thinning, and the ice sheet is losing mass in key sectors of Antarctica.
Added Jonathan Kingslake, an assistant professor at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory: "Warming on the Antarctic Peninsula is linked to human activity and probably triggered the collapse of two more northerly ice shelves." Larsen A and Larsen B collapsed in 1996 and 2002, respectively, after icebergs broke off.
As Packard sees it, "The Antarctic Peninsula is a window into a distressingly plausible, not-so-distant, future where the relatively stable climate the earth has thrived on enters meltdown mode. "
Climate campaigners have a name proposed for a huge iceberg researchers say is about to break off from an ice shelf in Antarctica: the #ExxonKnew Iceberg.
The calving, as the break-off is called, is happening on the Larsen C ice shelf in West Antarctica. According to the U.K.-based Project Midas, which is keeping track of the rift's progress, it could be one of the largest icebergs on record.
According to 350.org, the soon-to-be Delaware-sized iceberg presents an excellent opportunity to remind the public of Exxon's role in fueling climate change.
"With one of the world's biggest ice shelves at a breaking point, this destruction should bear the name of its greatest perpetrator: Exxon," said Aaron Packard, 350.org's Climate Impact Coordinator. "People deserve to understand the devastation of Exxon's decades of climate deception, and realize fossil fuel companies for the climate criminals they are."
The group's petition to the U.S. National Ice Center--the body that names icebergs--says the fossil fuel company "deceived the public, misled their shareholders, and robbed humanity of a generation's worth of time to reverse climate change," referring to the ExxonKnew scandal.
"We need to make sure their role in causing the climate crisis is not forgotten," says the petition, which the group says has garnered over ten thousand signatures. 350.org also posted this video to accompany the petition:
Writing Friday, Project Midas said that "the iceberg remains attached to the shelf by a thin band of ice," adding: "When it calves, the Larsen C Ice Shelf will lose more than 10 percent of its area to leave the ice front at its most retreated position ever recorded; this event will fundamentally change the landscape of the Antarctic Peninsula."
Still, "we do not need to press the panic button for Larsen C," says Helen Amanda Fricker, a glaciologist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography:
Large calving events such as this are normal processes of a healthy ice sheet, ones that have occurred for decades, centuries, millennia--on cycles that are much longer than a human or satellite lifetime.
At the same time, she noted:
There is plenty going on that merits concern: Antarctic ice shelves overall are seeing accelerated thinning, and the ice sheet is losing mass in key sectors of Antarctica.
Added Jonathan Kingslake, an assistant professor at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory: "Warming on the Antarctic Peninsula is linked to human activity and probably triggered the collapse of two more northerly ice shelves." Larsen A and Larsen B collapsed in 1996 and 2002, respectively, after icebergs broke off.
As Packard sees it, "The Antarctic Peninsula is a window into a distressingly plausible, not-so-distant, future where the relatively stable climate the earth has thrived on enters meltdown mode. "