SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump Self-Incriminates, Draws Rebuke With Latest 'Unhinged' Twitter Rant
By affirming that the ban is in fact a ban, Trump undermined his own administration's legal case
Jun 05, 2017
As commentators considered how a "normal" U.S. president might behave in the aftermath of an attack like the one that struck London on Saturday, many argued that President Donald Trump's response, which took the form of a "Twitter barrage," constitutes a perfect example of "not normal."
First, Trump launched an attack on London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Sunday, implying that Khan was downplaying the severity of the atrocities. After it was pointed out repeatedly that this narrative is false, Trump went after the mayor again:
In the same series of tweets on Monday morning, Trump doubled-down on his call for a "travel ban," affirming what lawyers and activists have argued all along: that his proposed restriction on immigration from a number of Muslim-majority countries amounts to a ban on Muslim immigration to the United States.
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union have responded to the tweetstorm by saying, in effect, "Thanks for making our point, Donald."
In the weeks leading up to and following Trump's signing of his initial executive order in January, Trump himself and administration officials repeatedly insisted that the restrictions imposed by the measure did not amount to a "ban" and were "not motivated by animus toward any religion." As legal challenges mounted, the administration released a revised version of the order in March, which was subsequently and successfully challenged in court.
Now, Trump appears to be undermining his administration's case, an act of self-destruction that, as one commentator noted on Twitter, "should help the court case against him."
Early Monday morning, continuing where he left off the previous night, Trump tweeted, "People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!"
Trump went on to launch an attack on the March version of his own executive order, calling it "watered down" and "politically correct."
The ACLU replied quickly, noting that Trump has "confirmed the ban is a BAN" while also conceding that the second executive order issued in March was substantively the same as the first.
Trump's comments--regarding the attacks themselves, London's mayor, and the travel ban--have been panned across the political spectrum as inaccurate and reprehensible.
The Washington Post's Greg Sargent characterized the tweetstorm as "unhinged" and said the president "may have given opponents of his immigration ban more ammunition against it in court." In addition, he said, Trump "confirmed once again that a deep rot of bad faith and a profound contempt for process continue to infest much of what this administration does."
The Associated Press concluded:
President Donald Trump can't be counted on to give accurate information to Americans when violent acts are unfolding abroad.
Trump's remarks come as the White House is taking steps to have the March executive order reinstated, despite the fact the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the order "drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As commentators considered how a "normal" U.S. president might behave in the aftermath of an attack like the one that struck London on Saturday, many argued that President Donald Trump's response, which took the form of a "Twitter barrage," constitutes a perfect example of "not normal."
First, Trump launched an attack on London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Sunday, implying that Khan was downplaying the severity of the atrocities. After it was pointed out repeatedly that this narrative is false, Trump went after the mayor again:
In the same series of tweets on Monday morning, Trump doubled-down on his call for a "travel ban," affirming what lawyers and activists have argued all along: that his proposed restriction on immigration from a number of Muslim-majority countries amounts to a ban on Muslim immigration to the United States.
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union have responded to the tweetstorm by saying, in effect, "Thanks for making our point, Donald."
In the weeks leading up to and following Trump's signing of his initial executive order in January, Trump himself and administration officials repeatedly insisted that the restrictions imposed by the measure did not amount to a "ban" and were "not motivated by animus toward any religion." As legal challenges mounted, the administration released a revised version of the order in March, which was subsequently and successfully challenged in court.
Now, Trump appears to be undermining his administration's case, an act of self-destruction that, as one commentator noted on Twitter, "should help the court case against him."
Early Monday morning, continuing where he left off the previous night, Trump tweeted, "People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!"
Trump went on to launch an attack on the March version of his own executive order, calling it "watered down" and "politically correct."
The ACLU replied quickly, noting that Trump has "confirmed the ban is a BAN" while also conceding that the second executive order issued in March was substantively the same as the first.
Trump's comments--regarding the attacks themselves, London's mayor, and the travel ban--have been panned across the political spectrum as inaccurate and reprehensible.
The Washington Post's Greg Sargent characterized the tweetstorm as "unhinged" and said the president "may have given opponents of his immigration ban more ammunition against it in court." In addition, he said, Trump "confirmed once again that a deep rot of bad faith and a profound contempt for process continue to infest much of what this administration does."
The Associated Press concluded:
President Donald Trump can't be counted on to give accurate information to Americans when violent acts are unfolding abroad.
Trump's remarks come as the White House is taking steps to have the March executive order reinstated, despite the fact the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the order "drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination."
As commentators considered how a "normal" U.S. president might behave in the aftermath of an attack like the one that struck London on Saturday, many argued that President Donald Trump's response, which took the form of a "Twitter barrage," constitutes a perfect example of "not normal."
First, Trump launched an attack on London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Sunday, implying that Khan was downplaying the severity of the atrocities. After it was pointed out repeatedly that this narrative is false, Trump went after the mayor again:
In the same series of tweets on Monday morning, Trump doubled-down on his call for a "travel ban," affirming what lawyers and activists have argued all along: that his proposed restriction on immigration from a number of Muslim-majority countries amounts to a ban on Muslim immigration to the United States.
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union have responded to the tweetstorm by saying, in effect, "Thanks for making our point, Donald."
In the weeks leading up to and following Trump's signing of his initial executive order in January, Trump himself and administration officials repeatedly insisted that the restrictions imposed by the measure did not amount to a "ban" and were "not motivated by animus toward any religion." As legal challenges mounted, the administration released a revised version of the order in March, which was subsequently and successfully challenged in court.
Now, Trump appears to be undermining his administration's case, an act of self-destruction that, as one commentator noted on Twitter, "should help the court case against him."
Early Monday morning, continuing where he left off the previous night, Trump tweeted, "People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!"
Trump went on to launch an attack on the March version of his own executive order, calling it "watered down" and "politically correct."
The ACLU replied quickly, noting that Trump has "confirmed the ban is a BAN" while also conceding that the second executive order issued in March was substantively the same as the first.
Trump's comments--regarding the attacks themselves, London's mayor, and the travel ban--have been panned across the political spectrum as inaccurate and reprehensible.
The Washington Post's Greg Sargent characterized the tweetstorm as "unhinged" and said the president "may have given opponents of his immigration ban more ammunition against it in court." In addition, he said, Trump "confirmed once again that a deep rot of bad faith and a profound contempt for process continue to infest much of what this administration does."
The Associated Press concluded:
President Donald Trump can't be counted on to give accurate information to Americans when violent acts are unfolding abroad.
Trump's remarks come as the White House is taking steps to have the March executive order reinstated, despite the fact the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the order "drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.