In Show of Internal Dissent, Federal Workers Rising Up Against Trump
Nearly 200 federal employees are reportedly set to attend an upcoming workshop on workers' rights and civil disobedience
From the 1,000 State Department officials rushing to sign an official dissent cable, to the 180 federal workers signing up for a workshop on civil disobedience, to the dozens of "rogue" agency Twitter accounts that have sprouted up in the last week, internal resistance to the right-wing Trump agenda is rivaling the power of people on the streets--perhaps not in numbers, but in energy and creativity.
In fact, according to the Washington Post, which reported on various strains of internal opposition on Tuesday, this "resistance from within" may be "potentially more troublesome to the administration" than airport protests or call-in campaigns.
"The resistance is so early, so widespread, and so deeply felt that it has officials worrying about paralysis and overt refusals by workers to do their jobs," wrote Post reporters Juliet Eilperin, Lisa Rein, and Marc Fisher.
And it is unique to this moment in history.
"I don't recall any kind of dissent like this happening either in a Democratic or Republican administration--this is clearly unusual," Chris Lu, the former deputy secretary of Labor in the Obama administration, told The Hill on Wednesday. "There is a very powerful dissent that is now coming to the forefront among career employees. It's unusual in my experience to have this, but we are dealing with an unusual president."
A president who, among his first orders of business, put a freeze on federal hiring. "Now," Politico reported at the time, "the president is about to find out how much power these maligned workers have to slow or even short-circuit his agenda."
"Disgruntled employees can leak information to Capitol Hill and the press, and prod inspectors general to probe political appointees," the outlet wrote. "They can also use the tools of bureaucracy to slow or sandbag policy proposals--moves that can overtly, or passive aggressively, unravel a White House's best-laid plans."
What's more, Lu said to The Hill, the administration's pushback on such resistance--such as Trump's firing of Acting Attorney General Sally Yates on Monday night, or press secretary Sean Spicer's threat this week that those State Department employees who are unhappy with the executive order on immigration "should either get with the program or they can go"--is likely to further catalyze protest from federal workers.
"It's not helpful for the president or his spokespeople to be attacking them," Lu said. "I don't think this will chill them. I think this is going to embolden career civil servants."
Indeed, "policy dissent is in our culture," one diplomat in Africa, who signed the dissent cable, told the New York Times. "We even have awards for it."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
From the 1,000 State Department officials rushing to sign an official dissent cable, to the 180 federal workers signing up for a workshop on civil disobedience, to the dozens of "rogue" agency Twitter accounts that have sprouted up in the last week, internal resistance to the right-wing Trump agenda is rivaling the power of people on the streets--perhaps not in numbers, but in energy and creativity.
In fact, according to the Washington Post, which reported on various strains of internal opposition on Tuesday, this "resistance from within" may be "potentially more troublesome to the administration" than airport protests or call-in campaigns.
"The resistance is so early, so widespread, and so deeply felt that it has officials worrying about paralysis and overt refusals by workers to do their jobs," wrote Post reporters Juliet Eilperin, Lisa Rein, and Marc Fisher.
And it is unique to this moment in history.
"I don't recall any kind of dissent like this happening either in a Democratic or Republican administration--this is clearly unusual," Chris Lu, the former deputy secretary of Labor in the Obama administration, told The Hill on Wednesday. "There is a very powerful dissent that is now coming to the forefront among career employees. It's unusual in my experience to have this, but we are dealing with an unusual president."
A president who, among his first orders of business, put a freeze on federal hiring. "Now," Politico reported at the time, "the president is about to find out how much power these maligned workers have to slow or even short-circuit his agenda."
"Disgruntled employees can leak information to Capitol Hill and the press, and prod inspectors general to probe political appointees," the outlet wrote. "They can also use the tools of bureaucracy to slow or sandbag policy proposals--moves that can overtly, or passive aggressively, unravel a White House's best-laid plans."
What's more, Lu said to The Hill, the administration's pushback on such resistance--such as Trump's firing of Acting Attorney General Sally Yates on Monday night, or press secretary Sean Spicer's threat this week that those State Department employees who are unhappy with the executive order on immigration "should either get with the program or they can go"--is likely to further catalyze protest from federal workers.
"It's not helpful for the president or his spokespeople to be attacking them," Lu said. "I don't think this will chill them. I think this is going to embolden career civil servants."
Indeed, "policy dissent is in our culture," one diplomat in Africa, who signed the dissent cable, told the New York Times. "We even have awards for it."
From the 1,000 State Department officials rushing to sign an official dissent cable, to the 180 federal workers signing up for a workshop on civil disobedience, to the dozens of "rogue" agency Twitter accounts that have sprouted up in the last week, internal resistance to the right-wing Trump agenda is rivaling the power of people on the streets--perhaps not in numbers, but in energy and creativity.
In fact, according to the Washington Post, which reported on various strains of internal opposition on Tuesday, this "resistance from within" may be "potentially more troublesome to the administration" than airport protests or call-in campaigns.
"The resistance is so early, so widespread, and so deeply felt that it has officials worrying about paralysis and overt refusals by workers to do their jobs," wrote Post reporters Juliet Eilperin, Lisa Rein, and Marc Fisher.
And it is unique to this moment in history.
"I don't recall any kind of dissent like this happening either in a Democratic or Republican administration--this is clearly unusual," Chris Lu, the former deputy secretary of Labor in the Obama administration, told The Hill on Wednesday. "There is a very powerful dissent that is now coming to the forefront among career employees. It's unusual in my experience to have this, but we are dealing with an unusual president."
A president who, among his first orders of business, put a freeze on federal hiring. "Now," Politico reported at the time, "the president is about to find out how much power these maligned workers have to slow or even short-circuit his agenda."
"Disgruntled employees can leak information to Capitol Hill and the press, and prod inspectors general to probe political appointees," the outlet wrote. "They can also use the tools of bureaucracy to slow or sandbag policy proposals--moves that can overtly, or passive aggressively, unravel a White House's best-laid plans."
What's more, Lu said to The Hill, the administration's pushback on such resistance--such as Trump's firing of Acting Attorney General Sally Yates on Monday night, or press secretary Sean Spicer's threat this week that those State Department employees who are unhappy with the executive order on immigration "should either get with the program or they can go"--is likely to further catalyze protest from federal workers.
"It's not helpful for the president or his spokespeople to be attacking them," Lu said. "I don't think this will chill them. I think this is going to embolden career civil servants."
Indeed, "policy dissent is in our culture," one diplomat in Africa, who signed the dissent cable, told the New York Times. "We even have awards for it."