'Everyone Should Have a Home': The man was convicted of stealing less than $5 of food.
(Photo: scribbletaylor/flickr/cc)
May 03, 2016
Italy's highest appeals court ruled on Monday that stealing food if you are hungry and poor is not a crime.
Judges with the Supreme Court of Cassation overturned a theft conviction against a Ukrainian man who stole $4.50 (EUR4.07) of sausage and cheese from a supermarket in Genoa in 2011. They found that he had taken the food "in the face of immediate and essential need for nourishment."
In 2015, Roman Ostriakov was sentenced to six months in jail and ordered to pay a $115 (EUR100) fine.
"The condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the merchandise theft took place prove that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of need," the court ruled on Monday. For that reason, the theft "does not constitute a crime."
The prosecutor in the case, Valeria Fazio, told theNew York Times on Tuesday that her office had appealed in hopes of getting Ostriakov a lighter sentence given his desperate circumstances--but had no expectation that the court would decide he "doesn't have to be punished at all."
Maurizio Bellacosa, a criminal law professor at Luiss University in Rome, added that the case is "a new principle, and it might lead to a more frequent application of the state of necessity linked to poverty situations."
However, as an op-ed in the Italian newspaper Corriere Della Serapointed out, it took three rounds of court rulings before a case concerning $4 of goods "in a country burdened with [$69 billion] a year of corruption" was overturned. The editorial by Goffredo Buccini said it is "unthinkable" that the law did not note that hundreds of people become homeless in Italy every day.
A former member of the Supreme Court of Cassation told the Times that the final verdict seemed to rely on an Italian doctrine based on the Latin phrase, "Ad impossibilia nemo tenetur," which translates to, "No one is expected to do the impossible."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Italy's highest appeals court ruled on Monday that stealing food if you are hungry and poor is not a crime.
Judges with the Supreme Court of Cassation overturned a theft conviction against a Ukrainian man who stole $4.50 (EUR4.07) of sausage and cheese from a supermarket in Genoa in 2011. They found that he had taken the food "in the face of immediate and essential need for nourishment."
In 2015, Roman Ostriakov was sentenced to six months in jail and ordered to pay a $115 (EUR100) fine.
"The condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the merchandise theft took place prove that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of need," the court ruled on Monday. For that reason, the theft "does not constitute a crime."
The prosecutor in the case, Valeria Fazio, told theNew York Times on Tuesday that her office had appealed in hopes of getting Ostriakov a lighter sentence given his desperate circumstances--but had no expectation that the court would decide he "doesn't have to be punished at all."
Maurizio Bellacosa, a criminal law professor at Luiss University in Rome, added that the case is "a new principle, and it might lead to a more frequent application of the state of necessity linked to poverty situations."
However, as an op-ed in the Italian newspaper Corriere Della Serapointed out, it took three rounds of court rulings before a case concerning $4 of goods "in a country burdened with [$69 billion] a year of corruption" was overturned. The editorial by Goffredo Buccini said it is "unthinkable" that the law did not note that hundreds of people become homeless in Italy every day.
A former member of the Supreme Court of Cassation told the Times that the final verdict seemed to rely on an Italian doctrine based on the Latin phrase, "Ad impossibilia nemo tenetur," which translates to, "No one is expected to do the impossible."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Italy's highest appeals court ruled on Monday that stealing food if you are hungry and poor is not a crime.
Judges with the Supreme Court of Cassation overturned a theft conviction against a Ukrainian man who stole $4.50 (EUR4.07) of sausage and cheese from a supermarket in Genoa in 2011. They found that he had taken the food "in the face of immediate and essential need for nourishment."
In 2015, Roman Ostriakov was sentenced to six months in jail and ordered to pay a $115 (EUR100) fine.
"The condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the merchandise theft took place prove that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of need," the court ruled on Monday. For that reason, the theft "does not constitute a crime."
The prosecutor in the case, Valeria Fazio, told theNew York Times on Tuesday that her office had appealed in hopes of getting Ostriakov a lighter sentence given his desperate circumstances--but had no expectation that the court would decide he "doesn't have to be punished at all."
Maurizio Bellacosa, a criminal law professor at Luiss University in Rome, added that the case is "a new principle, and it might lead to a more frequent application of the state of necessity linked to poverty situations."
However, as an op-ed in the Italian newspaper Corriere Della Serapointed out, it took three rounds of court rulings before a case concerning $4 of goods "in a country burdened with [$69 billion] a year of corruption" was overturned. The editorial by Goffredo Buccini said it is "unthinkable" that the law did not note that hundreds of people become homeless in Italy every day.
A former member of the Supreme Court of Cassation told the Times that the final verdict seemed to rely on an Italian doctrine based on the Latin phrase, "Ad impossibilia nemo tenetur," which translates to, "No one is expected to do the impossible."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.