SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture. (Photo: Thomas Hawk/cc/flickr)
A striking new analysis published this weekend found that federal prosecutors failed to pursue civil rights complaints against police officers a full 96 percent of the time.
The investigation, conducted by Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporters Brian Bowling and Andrew Conte, examined 3 million federal records regarding criminal complaints against law enforcement from 1995 through 2015. The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture.
Bowling and Conte uncovered "12,703 potential civil rights violations turned down nationwide out of 13,233 total complaints," including "high-profile incidents in Ferguson, Mo., Chicago and New York City."
In comparison, the Department of Justice rejected roughly 23 percent of complaints for other crimes.
"The most frequent reasons cited for declining civil rights complaints involving officers: weak or insufficient evidence, lack of criminal intent required under a 1945 Supreme Court ruling standard, and orders from the Justice Department," Bowling and Conte report.
Craig Futterman, a law professor who founded the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project at the University of Chicago, told the Tribune that "the failure to aggressively bring those cases has allowed too many abusive officers to believe that they can operate without fear of punishment."
The difficulty, according to legal experts, with charging a police officer with a civil rights complaint is proving that they had acted "willfully," as established in a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. But, as Futterman argues, "Just because they're challenging cases should not mean they should not be brought."
The reporting continues:
U.S. attorneys nationwide generally have the authority to decline referrals on their own. In civil rights cases when an officer has killed someone, when the case has been tried in a local court or has gained national notoriety, U.S. attorneys must coordinate with the assistant attorney general for civil rights in Washington, who has the final decision.
During the Obama administration, federal prosecutors have declined referrals for civil rights prosecution of officers 93 percent of the time. The "willful" standard is too high, former Attorney General Eric Holder said last year. He talked about recommending changes before leaving office but did not.
Now in private practice at Covington & Burling's Washington office, Holder declined a Trib request for an interview.
The analysis was released as the first installment of a series about prosecuting police.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A striking new analysis published this weekend found that federal prosecutors failed to pursue civil rights complaints against police officers a full 96 percent of the time.
The investigation, conducted by Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporters Brian Bowling and Andrew Conte, examined 3 million federal records regarding criminal complaints against law enforcement from 1995 through 2015. The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture.
Bowling and Conte uncovered "12,703 potential civil rights violations turned down nationwide out of 13,233 total complaints," including "high-profile incidents in Ferguson, Mo., Chicago and New York City."
In comparison, the Department of Justice rejected roughly 23 percent of complaints for other crimes.
"The most frequent reasons cited for declining civil rights complaints involving officers: weak or insufficient evidence, lack of criminal intent required under a 1945 Supreme Court ruling standard, and orders from the Justice Department," Bowling and Conte report.
Craig Futterman, a law professor who founded the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project at the University of Chicago, told the Tribune that "the failure to aggressively bring those cases has allowed too many abusive officers to believe that they can operate without fear of punishment."
The difficulty, according to legal experts, with charging a police officer with a civil rights complaint is proving that they had acted "willfully," as established in a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. But, as Futterman argues, "Just because they're challenging cases should not mean they should not be brought."
The reporting continues:
U.S. attorneys nationwide generally have the authority to decline referrals on their own. In civil rights cases when an officer has killed someone, when the case has been tried in a local court or has gained national notoriety, U.S. attorneys must coordinate with the assistant attorney general for civil rights in Washington, who has the final decision.
During the Obama administration, federal prosecutors have declined referrals for civil rights prosecution of officers 93 percent of the time. The "willful" standard is too high, former Attorney General Eric Holder said last year. He talked about recommending changes before leaving office but did not.
Now in private practice at Covington & Burling's Washington office, Holder declined a Trib request for an interview.
The analysis was released as the first installment of a series about prosecuting police.
A striking new analysis published this weekend found that federal prosecutors failed to pursue civil rights complaints against police officers a full 96 percent of the time.
The investigation, conducted by Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporters Brian Bowling and Andrew Conte, examined 3 million federal records regarding criminal complaints against law enforcement from 1995 through 2015. The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture.
Bowling and Conte uncovered "12,703 potential civil rights violations turned down nationwide out of 13,233 total complaints," including "high-profile incidents in Ferguson, Mo., Chicago and New York City."
In comparison, the Department of Justice rejected roughly 23 percent of complaints for other crimes.
"The most frequent reasons cited for declining civil rights complaints involving officers: weak or insufficient evidence, lack of criminal intent required under a 1945 Supreme Court ruling standard, and orders from the Justice Department," Bowling and Conte report.
Craig Futterman, a law professor who founded the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project at the University of Chicago, told the Tribune that "the failure to aggressively bring those cases has allowed too many abusive officers to believe that they can operate without fear of punishment."
The difficulty, according to legal experts, with charging a police officer with a civil rights complaint is proving that they had acted "willfully," as established in a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. But, as Futterman argues, "Just because they're challenging cases should not mean they should not be brought."
The reporting continues:
U.S. attorneys nationwide generally have the authority to decline referrals on their own. In civil rights cases when an officer has killed someone, when the case has been tried in a local court or has gained national notoriety, U.S. attorneys must coordinate with the assistant attorney general for civil rights in Washington, who has the final decision.
During the Obama administration, federal prosecutors have declined referrals for civil rights prosecution of officers 93 percent of the time. The "willful" standard is too high, former Attorney General Eric Holder said last year. He talked about recommending changes before leaving office but did not.
Now in private practice at Covington & Burling's Washington office, Holder declined a Trib request for an interview.
The analysis was released as the first installment of a series about prosecuting police.