North Korea's Alleged H-Bomb Test Points to Need for Global Ban on Nukes
The detonation was announced by North Korea state media and has not been independently confirmed
North Korea claimed on Wednesday to have successfully carried out a hydrogen bomb test, a move that--if true--would mark a notable advance in the country's nuclear capabilities and a significantly increased threat to the world.
The development was announced by North Korea's official KCNA news agency and has not been independently confirmed.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, a seismic event measuring at a magnitude of 5.1 occurred 12 miles east-northeast of Sungjibaegam on Wednesday morning, with a blast yield in the 10 to 15 kiloton range. The BBC reports: "The estimated size of the blast suggests that they did not succeed in detonating a full thermonuclear device, experts say, because in that case you would expect a blast closer to 100 kilotons or more."
Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, which works to prevent the spread and use of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and other weapons of war, weighed in on social media:
Regardless, the announcement drew immediate condemnation from world leaders. Italy's Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni, for example, reportedly urged his Japanese counterpart to discuss "the necessary reactions of the international community" to what Rome called North Korea's "provocation" if it is confirmed that a nuclear test was carried out. Japan currently holds the rotating helm of the Group of 7 industrialized nations, of which Italy is a member.
But anti-nuclear activists warned against knee-jerk responses and rhetorical escalation in the wake of the detonation.
While it denounced the nuclear test, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) said it was "another indication of the inability of the current nuclear regime to prevent states from seeking, possessing or modernizing nuclear weapons." The group urged states to go beyond condemning North Korea's actions, saying such censure "must be followed by the development of an international prohibition on nuclear weapons similar to the bans on chemical and biological weapons."
"All responsible states should negotiate new law on nuclear weapons, take a clear stand against the possession and reliance on this weapon of mass destruction and develop an unambiguous prohibition of nuclear weapons," said Beatrice Fihn, ICAN executive director.
In a post published Wednesday, Fihn added:
Nuclear weapons inflict indiscriminate and inhumane harm on humans and produce disastrous environmental impacts. Any detonation--either by intent or accident--would cause unacceptable humanitarian consequences, and no humanitarian relief agency could provide any meaningful assistance in the aftermath.
Despite this knowledge, the nine nuclear-armed states and the 28 members of the U.S. nuclear umbrella, believe that nuclear weapons are acceptable means of warfare and defense. The continued argument that nuclear weapons are essential to their security will only encourage other states to follow suit.
It is therefore urgent that states that are concerned about humanitarian law and humanitarian values act upon these beliefs and prohibit the most destructive and inhume weapon of them all. This must be done before a new arms race throws the world into duck and cover exercises all over again.
Meanwhile, on Twitter, demilitarization and peace organizer Christine Ahn, co-founder of the Korea Policy Institute, said the development pointed to the need for countries to go back to the negotiating table with Pyongyang.
She elaborated in a post on Facebook: "It's a very very unfortunate turn of events that North Korea tested a hydrogen bomb, but an even greater reason for the United States to end its futile policy of "strategic patience" (i.e. waiting for the North Korean regime to collapse) and engage. We need the peace movement that mobilized for the Iran deal to press for a peace treaty with North Korea, which Pyongyang has recently appealed for and was a promise made 63 years ago when Washington signed the armistice agreement with China and North Korea temporarily halting the war. It's what the South Korean peace movements have been calling for, and we need the U.S. [p]ublic to become aware of this history."
The United Nations Security Council was planning to meet on Wednesday morning in New York to discuss North Korea's nuclear test, council diplomats said. World leaders are set to meet next month in Geneva to conduct talks on developing new laws around nuclear weapons.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
North Korea claimed on Wednesday to have successfully carried out a hydrogen bomb test, a move that--if true--would mark a notable advance in the country's nuclear capabilities and a significantly increased threat to the world.
The development was announced by North Korea's official KCNA news agency and has not been independently confirmed.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, a seismic event measuring at a magnitude of 5.1 occurred 12 miles east-northeast of Sungjibaegam on Wednesday morning, with a blast yield in the 10 to 15 kiloton range. The BBC reports: "The estimated size of the blast suggests that they did not succeed in detonating a full thermonuclear device, experts say, because in that case you would expect a blast closer to 100 kilotons or more."
Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, which works to prevent the spread and use of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and other weapons of war, weighed in on social media:
Regardless, the announcement drew immediate condemnation from world leaders. Italy's Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni, for example, reportedly urged his Japanese counterpart to discuss "the necessary reactions of the international community" to what Rome called North Korea's "provocation" if it is confirmed that a nuclear test was carried out. Japan currently holds the rotating helm of the Group of 7 industrialized nations, of which Italy is a member.
But anti-nuclear activists warned against knee-jerk responses and rhetorical escalation in the wake of the detonation.
While it denounced the nuclear test, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) said it was "another indication of the inability of the current nuclear regime to prevent states from seeking, possessing or modernizing nuclear weapons." The group urged states to go beyond condemning North Korea's actions, saying such censure "must be followed by the development of an international prohibition on nuclear weapons similar to the bans on chemical and biological weapons."
"All responsible states should negotiate new law on nuclear weapons, take a clear stand against the possession and reliance on this weapon of mass destruction and develop an unambiguous prohibition of nuclear weapons," said Beatrice Fihn, ICAN executive director.
In a post published Wednesday, Fihn added:
Nuclear weapons inflict indiscriminate and inhumane harm on humans and produce disastrous environmental impacts. Any detonation--either by intent or accident--would cause unacceptable humanitarian consequences, and no humanitarian relief agency could provide any meaningful assistance in the aftermath.
Despite this knowledge, the nine nuclear-armed states and the 28 members of the U.S. nuclear umbrella, believe that nuclear weapons are acceptable means of warfare and defense. The continued argument that nuclear weapons are essential to their security will only encourage other states to follow suit.
It is therefore urgent that states that are concerned about humanitarian law and humanitarian values act upon these beliefs and prohibit the most destructive and inhume weapon of them all. This must be done before a new arms race throws the world into duck and cover exercises all over again.
Meanwhile, on Twitter, demilitarization and peace organizer Christine Ahn, co-founder of the Korea Policy Institute, said the development pointed to the need for countries to go back to the negotiating table with Pyongyang.
She elaborated in a post on Facebook: "It's a very very unfortunate turn of events that North Korea tested a hydrogen bomb, but an even greater reason for the United States to end its futile policy of "strategic patience" (i.e. waiting for the North Korean regime to collapse) and engage. We need the peace movement that mobilized for the Iran deal to press for a peace treaty with North Korea, which Pyongyang has recently appealed for and was a promise made 63 years ago when Washington signed the armistice agreement with China and North Korea temporarily halting the war. It's what the South Korean peace movements have been calling for, and we need the U.S. [p]ublic to become aware of this history."
The United Nations Security Council was planning to meet on Wednesday morning in New York to discuss North Korea's nuclear test, council diplomats said. World leaders are set to meet next month in Geneva to conduct talks on developing new laws around nuclear weapons.
North Korea claimed on Wednesday to have successfully carried out a hydrogen bomb test, a move that--if true--would mark a notable advance in the country's nuclear capabilities and a significantly increased threat to the world.
The development was announced by North Korea's official KCNA news agency and has not been independently confirmed.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, a seismic event measuring at a magnitude of 5.1 occurred 12 miles east-northeast of Sungjibaegam on Wednesday morning, with a blast yield in the 10 to 15 kiloton range. The BBC reports: "The estimated size of the blast suggests that they did not succeed in detonating a full thermonuclear device, experts say, because in that case you would expect a blast closer to 100 kilotons or more."
Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, which works to prevent the spread and use of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and other weapons of war, weighed in on social media:
Regardless, the announcement drew immediate condemnation from world leaders. Italy's Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni, for example, reportedly urged his Japanese counterpart to discuss "the necessary reactions of the international community" to what Rome called North Korea's "provocation" if it is confirmed that a nuclear test was carried out. Japan currently holds the rotating helm of the Group of 7 industrialized nations, of which Italy is a member.
But anti-nuclear activists warned against knee-jerk responses and rhetorical escalation in the wake of the detonation.
While it denounced the nuclear test, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) said it was "another indication of the inability of the current nuclear regime to prevent states from seeking, possessing or modernizing nuclear weapons." The group urged states to go beyond condemning North Korea's actions, saying such censure "must be followed by the development of an international prohibition on nuclear weapons similar to the bans on chemical and biological weapons."
"All responsible states should negotiate new law on nuclear weapons, take a clear stand against the possession and reliance on this weapon of mass destruction and develop an unambiguous prohibition of nuclear weapons," said Beatrice Fihn, ICAN executive director.
In a post published Wednesday, Fihn added:
Nuclear weapons inflict indiscriminate and inhumane harm on humans and produce disastrous environmental impacts. Any detonation--either by intent or accident--would cause unacceptable humanitarian consequences, and no humanitarian relief agency could provide any meaningful assistance in the aftermath.
Despite this knowledge, the nine nuclear-armed states and the 28 members of the U.S. nuclear umbrella, believe that nuclear weapons are acceptable means of warfare and defense. The continued argument that nuclear weapons are essential to their security will only encourage other states to follow suit.
It is therefore urgent that states that are concerned about humanitarian law and humanitarian values act upon these beliefs and prohibit the most destructive and inhume weapon of them all. This must be done before a new arms race throws the world into duck and cover exercises all over again.
Meanwhile, on Twitter, demilitarization and peace organizer Christine Ahn, co-founder of the Korea Policy Institute, said the development pointed to the need for countries to go back to the negotiating table with Pyongyang.
She elaborated in a post on Facebook: "It's a very very unfortunate turn of events that North Korea tested a hydrogen bomb, but an even greater reason for the United States to end its futile policy of "strategic patience" (i.e. waiting for the North Korean regime to collapse) and engage. We need the peace movement that mobilized for the Iran deal to press for a peace treaty with North Korea, which Pyongyang has recently appealed for and was a promise made 63 years ago when Washington signed the armistice agreement with China and North Korea temporarily halting the war. It's what the South Korean peace movements have been calling for, and we need the U.S. [p]ublic to become aware of this history."
The United Nations Security Council was planning to meet on Wednesday morning in New York to discuss North Korea's nuclear test, council diplomats said. World leaders are set to meet next month in Geneva to conduct talks on developing new laws around nuclear weapons.