SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Mall of America police at last year's Black Lives Matter demonstration.
(Photo: Getty)
Judge Rules Mall of America Can't Silence Black Lives Matter Protesters
Decision states mall can ban three specifically-named individuals from a Wednesday demonstration but can not force the group to post social media messages canceling the mobilization
Dec 22, 2015
On Tuesday afternoon, a Hennepin County judge struck a blow to the Mall of America's attempt to block a Black Lives Matter-Minneapolis protest slated for Wednesday at the iconic shopping center.
The court ruled that the mall can legally ban three people, who it claims are Black Lives Matter protest leaders, from the demonstration but can not force the organization to post social media messages to cancel the mobilization. The judge also rejected a temporary restraining order against the racial justice organization.
The Minneapolis chapter of Black Lives Matter posted an immediate response on Twitter.
\u201c.@mallofamerica's latest over the top waste of tax payer $ to silence free speech has failed miserably. See you tomorrow. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819755
\u201c4/5 parts of the MOA's lawsuit attempting to force us to tweet #BlackXmas is cancelled under threat of jail was struck down. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819434
\u201c3 alleged leaders are barred from going to MOA tomorrow, but there is no restraining order against the rest of attendees. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819511
Wednesday's demonstration will demand justice for Jamar Clark, a 24-year-old African-American killed by police in November while he was unarmed.
The mall was widely criticized for its attempt to quell the demonstration by limiting free speech, with its latest lawsuit derided as outrageous and totalitarian.
But the mall's offensive against organizers--aided by police and even the FBI--dates back at least a year.
At a Black Lives Matter protest at the mall last December, protesters were met with an aggressive response by police and then heavily prosecuted by the Bloomington attorney. It was also revealed that, ahead of the mobilization, they were spied on by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is web editor at In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
On Tuesday afternoon, a Hennepin County judge struck a blow to the Mall of America's attempt to block a Black Lives Matter-Minneapolis protest slated for Wednesday at the iconic shopping center.
The court ruled that the mall can legally ban three people, who it claims are Black Lives Matter protest leaders, from the demonstration but can not force the organization to post social media messages to cancel the mobilization. The judge also rejected a temporary restraining order against the racial justice organization.
The Minneapolis chapter of Black Lives Matter posted an immediate response on Twitter.
\u201c.@mallofamerica's latest over the top waste of tax payer $ to silence free speech has failed miserably. See you tomorrow. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819755
\u201c4/5 parts of the MOA's lawsuit attempting to force us to tweet #BlackXmas is cancelled under threat of jail was struck down. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819434
\u201c3 alleged leaders are barred from going to MOA tomorrow, but there is no restraining order against the rest of attendees. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819511
Wednesday's demonstration will demand justice for Jamar Clark, a 24-year-old African-American killed by police in November while he was unarmed.
The mall was widely criticized for its attempt to quell the demonstration by limiting free speech, with its latest lawsuit derided as outrageous and totalitarian.
But the mall's offensive against organizers--aided by police and even the FBI--dates back at least a year.
At a Black Lives Matter protest at the mall last December, protesters were met with an aggressive response by police and then heavily prosecuted by the Bloomington attorney. It was also revealed that, ahead of the mobilization, they were spied on by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is web editor at In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
On Tuesday afternoon, a Hennepin County judge struck a blow to the Mall of America's attempt to block a Black Lives Matter-Minneapolis protest slated for Wednesday at the iconic shopping center.
The court ruled that the mall can legally ban three people, who it claims are Black Lives Matter protest leaders, from the demonstration but can not force the organization to post social media messages to cancel the mobilization. The judge also rejected a temporary restraining order against the racial justice organization.
The Minneapolis chapter of Black Lives Matter posted an immediate response on Twitter.
\u201c.@mallofamerica's latest over the top waste of tax payer $ to silence free speech has failed miserably. See you tomorrow. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819755
\u201c4/5 parts of the MOA's lawsuit attempting to force us to tweet #BlackXmas is cancelled under threat of jail was struck down. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819434
\u201c3 alleged leaders are barred from going to MOA tomorrow, but there is no restraining order against the rest of attendees. #MOASueMeToo\u201d— Black Visions (@Black Visions) 1450819511
Wednesday's demonstration will demand justice for Jamar Clark, a 24-year-old African-American killed by police in November while he was unarmed.
The mall was widely criticized for its attempt to quell the demonstration by limiting free speech, with its latest lawsuit derided as outrageous and totalitarian.
But the mall's offensive against organizers--aided by police and even the FBI--dates back at least a year.
At a Black Lives Matter protest at the mall last December, protesters were met with an aggressive response by police and then heavily prosecuted by the Bloomington attorney. It was also revealed that, ahead of the mobilization, they were spied on by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.