SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Indian Point power plant. (Photo: Hope Abrams/flickr/cc)
Unplanned Nuclear Reactor Shutdown Highlights Power Plant's Dangers
Shutdown occurred after activists protested continued operation of Indian Point's expired Unit 3 reactor
Dec 15, 2015
A nuclear reactor at New York's Indian Point power plant was forced to shut down Monday due to an "electrical disturbance," days after its operational license expired.
Unit 3 was turned off around 7pm Monday and reportedly posed no threat to staff or the public. The shutdown took place just hours after dozens of anti-nuclear activists held a demonstration on site to protest the continued use of the reactor after its license expired at midnight on December 13.
It is also the latest in a series of unexpected failures at the power plant, which is situated roughly 30 miles north of New York City and operated by New Orleans-based firm Entergy. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ordered an investigation into the shutdown and said that the "recent unplanned outages" require "increased inspections and scrutiny" at the site.
But for the roughly 30 activists who on Monday draped yellow caution tape across the power plant's entrance--and the 11 who were arrested in the process--simply augmenting the inspection process is not enough to ensure safety for those who live in the vicinity of Indian Point.
"We want the plant shut; the plant never should have been opened in the first place," Gary Shaw, an organizer with Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition (IPSEC), told the Mid-Hudson News. "Indian Point is the nuclear plant that the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC] has defined as the nuclear plant in the United States with the highest probability of reactor core damage from seismic activity. Indian Point 3 is one mile from the intersection of two seismic faults."
As New York's director of state operations Jim Malatras told independent journalist Paul Derienzo for a piece published Monday, "'The NRC should, on an expedited basis, deny Entergy's application for relicensing of the Indian Point Facilities.' According to him, operating the plants so close to the city for another 20 years 'puts too many New Yorkers at risk.'"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A nuclear reactor at New York's Indian Point power plant was forced to shut down Monday due to an "electrical disturbance," days after its operational license expired.
Unit 3 was turned off around 7pm Monday and reportedly posed no threat to staff or the public. The shutdown took place just hours after dozens of anti-nuclear activists held a demonstration on site to protest the continued use of the reactor after its license expired at midnight on December 13.
It is also the latest in a series of unexpected failures at the power plant, which is situated roughly 30 miles north of New York City and operated by New Orleans-based firm Entergy. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ordered an investigation into the shutdown and said that the "recent unplanned outages" require "increased inspections and scrutiny" at the site.
But for the roughly 30 activists who on Monday draped yellow caution tape across the power plant's entrance--and the 11 who were arrested in the process--simply augmenting the inspection process is not enough to ensure safety for those who live in the vicinity of Indian Point.
"We want the plant shut; the plant never should have been opened in the first place," Gary Shaw, an organizer with Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition (IPSEC), told the Mid-Hudson News. "Indian Point is the nuclear plant that the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC] has defined as the nuclear plant in the United States with the highest probability of reactor core damage from seismic activity. Indian Point 3 is one mile from the intersection of two seismic faults."
As New York's director of state operations Jim Malatras told independent journalist Paul Derienzo for a piece published Monday, "'The NRC should, on an expedited basis, deny Entergy's application for relicensing of the Indian Point Facilities.' According to him, operating the plants so close to the city for another 20 years 'puts too many New Yorkers at risk.'"
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A nuclear reactor at New York's Indian Point power plant was forced to shut down Monday due to an "electrical disturbance," days after its operational license expired.
Unit 3 was turned off around 7pm Monday and reportedly posed no threat to staff or the public. The shutdown took place just hours after dozens of anti-nuclear activists held a demonstration on site to protest the continued use of the reactor after its license expired at midnight on December 13.
It is also the latest in a series of unexpected failures at the power plant, which is situated roughly 30 miles north of New York City and operated by New Orleans-based firm Entergy. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ordered an investigation into the shutdown and said that the "recent unplanned outages" require "increased inspections and scrutiny" at the site.
But for the roughly 30 activists who on Monday draped yellow caution tape across the power plant's entrance--and the 11 who were arrested in the process--simply augmenting the inspection process is not enough to ensure safety for those who live in the vicinity of Indian Point.
"We want the plant shut; the plant never should have been opened in the first place," Gary Shaw, an organizer with Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition (IPSEC), told the Mid-Hudson News. "Indian Point is the nuclear plant that the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC] has defined as the nuclear plant in the United States with the highest probability of reactor core damage from seismic activity. Indian Point 3 is one mile from the intersection of two seismic faults."
As New York's director of state operations Jim Malatras told independent journalist Paul Derienzo for a piece published Monday, "'The NRC should, on an expedited basis, deny Entergy's application for relicensing of the Indian Point Facilities.' According to him, operating the plants so close to the city for another 20 years 'puts too many New Yorkers at risk.'"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.