Anti-Transparency Bill Implies Pennsylvania Police Have 'Something to Hide'
'We give our police officers a great deal of power. It is crucial that transparency is coupled with that power.'
The Pennsylvania State House on Tuesday passed a controversial bill that would hide the identities of police officers who use force or fire their guns while on duty, at least until an investigation is completed--a move the state ACLU chapter said would only serve to harm community relations.
According to the measure, officials would be banned from identifying officers unless an investigation brought about charges, or if releasing their names would not risk harm to the officer, their family, or their property.
Currently, Philadelphia releases the names of officers involved in shootings within three days, unless a threat is made against them or their families. House Bill 1538 (pdf) seeks to strike and replace that process.
The bill, sponsored by State Rep. Martina White (R-Philadelphia) and endorsed by the Fraternal Order of the Police (FOP) State Lodge and the State Troopers Association, passed 162-38 and now heads to the state Senate.
Lawmakers reportedly debated for more than an hour as opponents criticized the bill for what they saw as worryingly vague language and a flouting of transparency.
"The power of life and death should come with a high level of public oversight and scrutiny," said State Rep. Jordan Harris (D-Philadelphia).
At a slim three pages, the bill states that "the name and identifying information of the law enforcement officer may not be released to the public by any public official or public employee conducting or participating in the official investigation or any person acting on behalf of such public official or public employee."
But as State Rep. Brian Sims (D-Philadelphia) warned on the House floor, lawmakers "know nothing about this legislation."
"And so I urge my colleagues, please do not confuse your righteous support for the FOP with support for a feckless piece of legislation," Sims said.
The ACLU of Philadelphia also criticized the bill.
"We give our police officers a great deal of power, including the use of physical force, up to and including deadly force," said Reggie Shuford, ACLU-PA executive director. "It is crucial that transparency is coupled with that power."
"This bill diminishes transparency," Shuford added. "The implication here is that police officers who use force have something to hide."
Andy Hoover, ACLU-PA legislative director, said this type of policy "actually harms police-community relations by withholding information from the public."
"Local officials are best equipped to determine whether or not to release an officer's name in this type of situation," Hoover said. "They can assess the circumstances in their communities and reach a conclusion. This is not the type of decision that should be made in the state capitol."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Pennsylvania State House on Tuesday passed a controversial bill that would hide the identities of police officers who use force or fire their guns while on duty, at least until an investigation is completed--a move the state ACLU chapter said would only serve to harm community relations.
According to the measure, officials would be banned from identifying officers unless an investigation brought about charges, or if releasing their names would not risk harm to the officer, their family, or their property.
Currently, Philadelphia releases the names of officers involved in shootings within three days, unless a threat is made against them or their families. House Bill 1538 (pdf) seeks to strike and replace that process.
The bill, sponsored by State Rep. Martina White (R-Philadelphia) and endorsed by the Fraternal Order of the Police (FOP) State Lodge and the State Troopers Association, passed 162-38 and now heads to the state Senate.
Lawmakers reportedly debated for more than an hour as opponents criticized the bill for what they saw as worryingly vague language and a flouting of transparency.
"The power of life and death should come with a high level of public oversight and scrutiny," said State Rep. Jordan Harris (D-Philadelphia).
At a slim three pages, the bill states that "the name and identifying information of the law enforcement officer may not be released to the public by any public official or public employee conducting or participating in the official investigation or any person acting on behalf of such public official or public employee."
But as State Rep. Brian Sims (D-Philadelphia) warned on the House floor, lawmakers "know nothing about this legislation."
"And so I urge my colleagues, please do not confuse your righteous support for the FOP with support for a feckless piece of legislation," Sims said.
The ACLU of Philadelphia also criticized the bill.
"We give our police officers a great deal of power, including the use of physical force, up to and including deadly force," said Reggie Shuford, ACLU-PA executive director. "It is crucial that transparency is coupled with that power."
"This bill diminishes transparency," Shuford added. "The implication here is that police officers who use force have something to hide."
Andy Hoover, ACLU-PA legislative director, said this type of policy "actually harms police-community relations by withholding information from the public."
"Local officials are best equipped to determine whether or not to release an officer's name in this type of situation," Hoover said. "They can assess the circumstances in their communities and reach a conclusion. This is not the type of decision that should be made in the state capitol."
The Pennsylvania State House on Tuesday passed a controversial bill that would hide the identities of police officers who use force or fire their guns while on duty, at least until an investigation is completed--a move the state ACLU chapter said would only serve to harm community relations.
According to the measure, officials would be banned from identifying officers unless an investigation brought about charges, or if releasing their names would not risk harm to the officer, their family, or their property.
Currently, Philadelphia releases the names of officers involved in shootings within three days, unless a threat is made against them or their families. House Bill 1538 (pdf) seeks to strike and replace that process.
The bill, sponsored by State Rep. Martina White (R-Philadelphia) and endorsed by the Fraternal Order of the Police (FOP) State Lodge and the State Troopers Association, passed 162-38 and now heads to the state Senate.
Lawmakers reportedly debated for more than an hour as opponents criticized the bill for what they saw as worryingly vague language and a flouting of transparency.
"The power of life and death should come with a high level of public oversight and scrutiny," said State Rep. Jordan Harris (D-Philadelphia).
At a slim three pages, the bill states that "the name and identifying information of the law enforcement officer may not be released to the public by any public official or public employee conducting or participating in the official investigation or any person acting on behalf of such public official or public employee."
But as State Rep. Brian Sims (D-Philadelphia) warned on the House floor, lawmakers "know nothing about this legislation."
"And so I urge my colleagues, please do not confuse your righteous support for the FOP with support for a feckless piece of legislation," Sims said.
The ACLU of Philadelphia also criticized the bill.
"We give our police officers a great deal of power, including the use of physical force, up to and including deadly force," said Reggie Shuford, ACLU-PA executive director. "It is crucial that transparency is coupled with that power."
"This bill diminishes transparency," Shuford added. "The implication here is that police officers who use force have something to hide."
Andy Hoover, ACLU-PA legislative director, said this type of policy "actually harms police-community relations by withholding information from the public."
"Local officials are best equipped to determine whether or not to release an officer's name in this type of situation," Hoover said. "They can assess the circumstances in their communities and reach a conclusion. This is not the type of decision that should be made in the state capitol."