'They Throw Away Our Lives': Honolulu Sued Over Homeless Crackdown
"Using arrests to solve homelessness...is contrary to a fair and just community."
The ACLU filed suit against Honolulu, Hawaii on Wednesday over the city's raids of homeless encampments, saying officials violated constitutional rights of individuals dwelling in the camps by throwing out food and vital belongings during massive sweeps.
The complaint was filed on behalf of families and children living in one of the nation's largest homeless encampments, which the suit says has been regularly targeted for clearance sweeps--that at least one plaintiff said also impedes families' attempts at becoming housing-secure.
According to the suit:
In just one unannounced sweep in Kaka'ako, on November 13, 2014, City officials seized and destroyed the Plaintiffs' property, including their food, children`s toys, prescription medications, and government identification documents....City workers have repeatedly refused to allow property owners to retrieve necessary personal belongings like medications and identification documents, instead threatening them with arrest if they interfere with the sweep.
"The Constitution protects us all equally, regardless of who we are and whether we are rich or poor," said ACLU Hawaii legal director Dan Gluck. "Using arrests to solve homelessness and destroying what little property a homeless individual has to survive is contrary to a fair and just community. All these policies do is set families back and makes it harder for them to build productive lives."
Explained plaintiff Tabatha Martin, "Like many people here, my husband and I are working hard. We`re saving up for a small apartment for us and our four-year-old daughter. Every time the City comes and throws away our tents, or our clothes, or our IDs, they throw away our lives. We have to start all over again and pay to replace those things. All of our savings are used up, keeping us on the street even longer."
Lack of identification has also prevented Martin and families like hers from being accepted into homeless shelters in the area.
Honolulu's crackdown on homeless encampments have grown increasingly stringent in recent months with new ordinances forbidding storing property on sidewalks. But the city is also required to retain the seized belongings and return them to owners for a $200 fee--an onerous rule which plaintiffs say often get ignored anyway. The case outlines numerous instances in which cleanup crews simply threw seized goods, including tents, in the trash.
"We lost a canopy. We didn't have time to break that down once they come out with the red tape," Martin told KITV. "My husband lost all his forms of identification and in his eyes he doesn't exist at all."
Included among the plaintiffs are several children, identified only by their initials, who said they went hungry after city officials threw out food seized during the raids.
As Gluck told the Associated Press on Wednesday, "The Constitution prohibits what the city has done repeatedly to our clients, which is to come up to them and seize and destroy their property without any recourse whatsoever."
Added Kathryn Xian, executive director of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, "You're talking about a community with almost no access to justice."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The ACLU filed suit against Honolulu, Hawaii on Wednesday over the city's raids of homeless encampments, saying officials violated constitutional rights of individuals dwelling in the camps by throwing out food and vital belongings during massive sweeps.
The complaint was filed on behalf of families and children living in one of the nation's largest homeless encampments, which the suit says has been regularly targeted for clearance sweeps--that at least one plaintiff said also impedes families' attempts at becoming housing-secure.
According to the suit:
In just one unannounced sweep in Kaka'ako, on November 13, 2014, City officials seized and destroyed the Plaintiffs' property, including their food, children`s toys, prescription medications, and government identification documents....City workers have repeatedly refused to allow property owners to retrieve necessary personal belongings like medications and identification documents, instead threatening them with arrest if they interfere with the sweep.
"The Constitution protects us all equally, regardless of who we are and whether we are rich or poor," said ACLU Hawaii legal director Dan Gluck. "Using arrests to solve homelessness and destroying what little property a homeless individual has to survive is contrary to a fair and just community. All these policies do is set families back and makes it harder for them to build productive lives."
Explained plaintiff Tabatha Martin, "Like many people here, my husband and I are working hard. We`re saving up for a small apartment for us and our four-year-old daughter. Every time the City comes and throws away our tents, or our clothes, or our IDs, they throw away our lives. We have to start all over again and pay to replace those things. All of our savings are used up, keeping us on the street even longer."
Lack of identification has also prevented Martin and families like hers from being accepted into homeless shelters in the area.
Honolulu's crackdown on homeless encampments have grown increasingly stringent in recent months with new ordinances forbidding storing property on sidewalks. But the city is also required to retain the seized belongings and return them to owners for a $200 fee--an onerous rule which plaintiffs say often get ignored anyway. The case outlines numerous instances in which cleanup crews simply threw seized goods, including tents, in the trash.
"We lost a canopy. We didn't have time to break that down once they come out with the red tape," Martin told KITV. "My husband lost all his forms of identification and in his eyes he doesn't exist at all."
Included among the plaintiffs are several children, identified only by their initials, who said they went hungry after city officials threw out food seized during the raids.
As Gluck told the Associated Press on Wednesday, "The Constitution prohibits what the city has done repeatedly to our clients, which is to come up to them and seize and destroy their property without any recourse whatsoever."
Added Kathryn Xian, executive director of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, "You're talking about a community with almost no access to justice."
The ACLU filed suit against Honolulu, Hawaii on Wednesday over the city's raids of homeless encampments, saying officials violated constitutional rights of individuals dwelling in the camps by throwing out food and vital belongings during massive sweeps.
The complaint was filed on behalf of families and children living in one of the nation's largest homeless encampments, which the suit says has been regularly targeted for clearance sweeps--that at least one plaintiff said also impedes families' attempts at becoming housing-secure.
According to the suit:
In just one unannounced sweep in Kaka'ako, on November 13, 2014, City officials seized and destroyed the Plaintiffs' property, including their food, children`s toys, prescription medications, and government identification documents....City workers have repeatedly refused to allow property owners to retrieve necessary personal belongings like medications and identification documents, instead threatening them with arrest if they interfere with the sweep.
"The Constitution protects us all equally, regardless of who we are and whether we are rich or poor," said ACLU Hawaii legal director Dan Gluck. "Using arrests to solve homelessness and destroying what little property a homeless individual has to survive is contrary to a fair and just community. All these policies do is set families back and makes it harder for them to build productive lives."
Explained plaintiff Tabatha Martin, "Like many people here, my husband and I are working hard. We`re saving up for a small apartment for us and our four-year-old daughter. Every time the City comes and throws away our tents, or our clothes, or our IDs, they throw away our lives. We have to start all over again and pay to replace those things. All of our savings are used up, keeping us on the street even longer."
Lack of identification has also prevented Martin and families like hers from being accepted into homeless shelters in the area.
Honolulu's crackdown on homeless encampments have grown increasingly stringent in recent months with new ordinances forbidding storing property on sidewalks. But the city is also required to retain the seized belongings and return them to owners for a $200 fee--an onerous rule which plaintiffs say often get ignored anyway. The case outlines numerous instances in which cleanup crews simply threw seized goods, including tents, in the trash.
"We lost a canopy. We didn't have time to break that down once they come out with the red tape," Martin told KITV. "My husband lost all his forms of identification and in his eyes he doesn't exist at all."
Included among the plaintiffs are several children, identified only by their initials, who said they went hungry after city officials threw out food seized during the raids.
As Gluck told the Associated Press on Wednesday, "The Constitution prohibits what the city has done repeatedly to our clients, which is to come up to them and seize and destroy their property without any recourse whatsoever."
Added Kathryn Xian, executive director of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, "You're talking about a community with almost no access to justice."