A homeless camp in Honolulu. (Photo: albedo20/flickr/cc)
Sep 17, 2015
The ACLU filed suit against Honolulu, Hawaii on Wednesday over the city's raids of homeless encampments, saying officials violated constitutional rights of individuals dwelling in the camps by throwing out food and vital belongings during massive sweeps.
The complaint was filed on behalf of families and children living in one of the nation's largest homeless encampments, which the suit says has been regularly targeted for clearance sweeps--that at least one plaintiff said also impedes families' attempts at becoming housing-secure.
According to the suit:
In just one unannounced sweep in Kaka'ako, on November 13, 2014, City officials seized and destroyed the Plaintiffs' property, including their food, children`s toys, prescription medications, and government identification documents....City workers have repeatedly refused to allow property owners to retrieve necessary personal belongings like medications and identification documents, instead threatening them with arrest if they interfere with the sweep.
"The Constitution protects us all equally, regardless of who we are and whether we are rich or poor," said ACLU Hawaii legal director Dan Gluck. "Using arrests to solve homelessness and destroying what little property a homeless individual has to survive is contrary to a fair and just community. All these policies do is set families back and makes it harder for them to build productive lives."
Explained plaintiff Tabatha Martin, "Like many people here, my husband and I are working hard. We`re saving up for a small apartment for us and our four-year-old daughter. Every time the City comes and throws away our tents, or our clothes, or our IDs, they throw away our lives. We have to start all over again and pay to replace those things. All of our savings are used up, keeping us on the street even longer."
Lack of identification has also prevented Martin and families like hers from being accepted into homeless shelters in the area.
Honolulu's crackdown on homeless encampments have grown increasingly stringent in recent months with new ordinances forbidding storing property on sidewalks. But the city is also required to retain the seized belongings and return them to owners for a $200 fee--an onerous rule which plaintiffs say often get ignored anyway. The case outlines numerous instances in which cleanup crews simply threw seized goods, including tents, in the trash.
"We lost a canopy. We didn't have time to break that down once they come out with the red tape," Martin told KITV. "My husband lost all his forms of identification and in his eyes he doesn't exist at all."
Included among the plaintiffs are several children, identified only by their initials, who said they went hungry after city officials threw out food seized during the raids.
As Gluck told the Associated Press on Wednesday, "The Constitution prohibits what the city has done repeatedly to our clients, which is to come up to them and seize and destroy their property without any recourse whatsoever."
Added Kathryn Xian, executive director of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, "You're talking about a community with almost no access to justice."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The ACLU filed suit against Honolulu, Hawaii on Wednesday over the city's raids of homeless encampments, saying officials violated constitutional rights of individuals dwelling in the camps by throwing out food and vital belongings during massive sweeps.
The complaint was filed on behalf of families and children living in one of the nation's largest homeless encampments, which the suit says has been regularly targeted for clearance sweeps--that at least one plaintiff said also impedes families' attempts at becoming housing-secure.
According to the suit:
In just one unannounced sweep in Kaka'ako, on November 13, 2014, City officials seized and destroyed the Plaintiffs' property, including their food, children`s toys, prescription medications, and government identification documents....City workers have repeatedly refused to allow property owners to retrieve necessary personal belongings like medications and identification documents, instead threatening them with arrest if they interfere with the sweep.
"The Constitution protects us all equally, regardless of who we are and whether we are rich or poor," said ACLU Hawaii legal director Dan Gluck. "Using arrests to solve homelessness and destroying what little property a homeless individual has to survive is contrary to a fair and just community. All these policies do is set families back and makes it harder for them to build productive lives."
Explained plaintiff Tabatha Martin, "Like many people here, my husband and I are working hard. We`re saving up for a small apartment for us and our four-year-old daughter. Every time the City comes and throws away our tents, or our clothes, or our IDs, they throw away our lives. We have to start all over again and pay to replace those things. All of our savings are used up, keeping us on the street even longer."
Lack of identification has also prevented Martin and families like hers from being accepted into homeless shelters in the area.
Honolulu's crackdown on homeless encampments have grown increasingly stringent in recent months with new ordinances forbidding storing property on sidewalks. But the city is also required to retain the seized belongings and return them to owners for a $200 fee--an onerous rule which plaintiffs say often get ignored anyway. The case outlines numerous instances in which cleanup crews simply threw seized goods, including tents, in the trash.
"We lost a canopy. We didn't have time to break that down once they come out with the red tape," Martin told KITV. "My husband lost all his forms of identification and in his eyes he doesn't exist at all."
Included among the plaintiffs are several children, identified only by their initials, who said they went hungry after city officials threw out food seized during the raids.
As Gluck told the Associated Press on Wednesday, "The Constitution prohibits what the city has done repeatedly to our clients, which is to come up to them and seize and destroy their property without any recourse whatsoever."
Added Kathryn Xian, executive director of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, "You're talking about a community with almost no access to justice."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The ACLU filed suit against Honolulu, Hawaii on Wednesday over the city's raids of homeless encampments, saying officials violated constitutional rights of individuals dwelling in the camps by throwing out food and vital belongings during massive sweeps.
The complaint was filed on behalf of families and children living in one of the nation's largest homeless encampments, which the suit says has been regularly targeted for clearance sweeps--that at least one plaintiff said also impedes families' attempts at becoming housing-secure.
According to the suit:
In just one unannounced sweep in Kaka'ako, on November 13, 2014, City officials seized and destroyed the Plaintiffs' property, including their food, children`s toys, prescription medications, and government identification documents....City workers have repeatedly refused to allow property owners to retrieve necessary personal belongings like medications and identification documents, instead threatening them with arrest if they interfere with the sweep.
"The Constitution protects us all equally, regardless of who we are and whether we are rich or poor," said ACLU Hawaii legal director Dan Gluck. "Using arrests to solve homelessness and destroying what little property a homeless individual has to survive is contrary to a fair and just community. All these policies do is set families back and makes it harder for them to build productive lives."
Explained plaintiff Tabatha Martin, "Like many people here, my husband and I are working hard. We`re saving up for a small apartment for us and our four-year-old daughter. Every time the City comes and throws away our tents, or our clothes, or our IDs, they throw away our lives. We have to start all over again and pay to replace those things. All of our savings are used up, keeping us on the street even longer."
Lack of identification has also prevented Martin and families like hers from being accepted into homeless shelters in the area.
Honolulu's crackdown on homeless encampments have grown increasingly stringent in recent months with new ordinances forbidding storing property on sidewalks. But the city is also required to retain the seized belongings and return them to owners for a $200 fee--an onerous rule which plaintiffs say often get ignored anyway. The case outlines numerous instances in which cleanup crews simply threw seized goods, including tents, in the trash.
"We lost a canopy. We didn't have time to break that down once they come out with the red tape," Martin told KITV. "My husband lost all his forms of identification and in his eyes he doesn't exist at all."
Included among the plaintiffs are several children, identified only by their initials, who said they went hungry after city officials threw out food seized during the raids.
As Gluck told the Associated Press on Wednesday, "The Constitution prohibits what the city has done repeatedly to our clients, which is to come up to them and seize and destroy their property without any recourse whatsoever."
Added Kathryn Xian, executive director of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, "You're talking about a community with almost no access to justice."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.