SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Sabotage' Convictions Vacated for Anti-Nuclear Nun, Army Vet Activists
Three activists convicted under Sabotage Act for breaking into uranium facility will be re-sentenced
May 12, 2015
A federal appeals court has vacated the 2014 convictions handed down to three anti-nuclear activists--a nun and two army veterans--and ordered a lower court to re-sentence them.
Sister Megan Rice, Greg Boertje-Obed, and Michael Walli were convicted last year of damaging national defense premises under the Sabotage Act after the activists entered the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, in July 2012.
85-year-old Rice was originally sentenced to 35 months, while Boertje-Obed and Walli were sentenced to 62 months each.
However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last Friday that the government failed to prove that the activists, who are part of the pacifist anti-nuclear group Transform Now Plowshares, intended to "injure the national defense," which is required under the Sabotage Act.
"They were nonviolent protestors in the tradition of Gandhi, not saboteurs. We are pleased the Sixth Circuit appreciated the difference."
--Ralph Hutchison, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance
"That provision applies only if the defendant acted 'with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense,' and authorizes a sentence of up to 20 years," the court said (pdf). "A jury convicted the defendants on the sabotage count and the injury-to-property count."
After entering the compound, the activists went into a Department of Energy building which contained enriched uranium and "pray-painted antiwar slogans, hung crime tape and banners with biblical phrases, splashed blood, and sang hymns," the ruling states. They also struck the building with small hammers, which delayed a shipment that was scheduled to arrive that afternoon.
"No rational jury could find that the defendants had that intent when they cut the fences; they did not cut them to allow al Qaeda to slip in behind," the ruling continues. "Nor could a rational jury find that the defendants had that intent when they engaged in their protest activities outside the [Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility]."
As Kevin Gosztola wrote last week at Firedoglake, "Such a conclusion is a huge victory for activists, because it means the government cannot stand in court and equate an act of protest with sabotage without evidence of motive."
"The purpose of the action of Michael, Megan and Greg was to call attention to the ongoing production of thermonuclear weapons components at the bomb plant in Oak Ridge and, more specifically, to oppose plans to build a new, multi-billion dollar bomb plant--the Uranium Processing Facility--at Y12," said Ralph Hutchison, coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, after the decision was announced. "They were nonviolent protestors in the tradition of Gandhi, not saboteurs. We are pleased the Sixth Circuit appreciated the difference."
It is unclear when the re-sentencing will take place.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A federal appeals court has vacated the 2014 convictions handed down to three anti-nuclear activists--a nun and two army veterans--and ordered a lower court to re-sentence them.
Sister Megan Rice, Greg Boertje-Obed, and Michael Walli were convicted last year of damaging national defense premises under the Sabotage Act after the activists entered the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, in July 2012.
85-year-old Rice was originally sentenced to 35 months, while Boertje-Obed and Walli were sentenced to 62 months each.
However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last Friday that the government failed to prove that the activists, who are part of the pacifist anti-nuclear group Transform Now Plowshares, intended to "injure the national defense," which is required under the Sabotage Act.
"They were nonviolent protestors in the tradition of Gandhi, not saboteurs. We are pleased the Sixth Circuit appreciated the difference."
--Ralph Hutchison, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance
"That provision applies only if the defendant acted 'with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense,' and authorizes a sentence of up to 20 years," the court said (pdf). "A jury convicted the defendants on the sabotage count and the injury-to-property count."
After entering the compound, the activists went into a Department of Energy building which contained enriched uranium and "pray-painted antiwar slogans, hung crime tape and banners with biblical phrases, splashed blood, and sang hymns," the ruling states. They also struck the building with small hammers, which delayed a shipment that was scheduled to arrive that afternoon.
"No rational jury could find that the defendants had that intent when they cut the fences; they did not cut them to allow al Qaeda to slip in behind," the ruling continues. "Nor could a rational jury find that the defendants had that intent when they engaged in their protest activities outside the [Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility]."
As Kevin Gosztola wrote last week at Firedoglake, "Such a conclusion is a huge victory for activists, because it means the government cannot stand in court and equate an act of protest with sabotage without evidence of motive."
"The purpose of the action of Michael, Megan and Greg was to call attention to the ongoing production of thermonuclear weapons components at the bomb plant in Oak Ridge and, more specifically, to oppose plans to build a new, multi-billion dollar bomb plant--the Uranium Processing Facility--at Y12," said Ralph Hutchison, coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, after the decision was announced. "They were nonviolent protestors in the tradition of Gandhi, not saboteurs. We are pleased the Sixth Circuit appreciated the difference."
It is unclear when the re-sentencing will take place.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A federal appeals court has vacated the 2014 convictions handed down to three anti-nuclear activists--a nun and two army veterans--and ordered a lower court to re-sentence them.
Sister Megan Rice, Greg Boertje-Obed, and Michael Walli were convicted last year of damaging national defense premises under the Sabotage Act after the activists entered the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, in July 2012.
85-year-old Rice was originally sentenced to 35 months, while Boertje-Obed and Walli were sentenced to 62 months each.
However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last Friday that the government failed to prove that the activists, who are part of the pacifist anti-nuclear group Transform Now Plowshares, intended to "injure the national defense," which is required under the Sabotage Act.
"They were nonviolent protestors in the tradition of Gandhi, not saboteurs. We are pleased the Sixth Circuit appreciated the difference."
--Ralph Hutchison, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance
"That provision applies only if the defendant acted 'with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense,' and authorizes a sentence of up to 20 years," the court said (pdf). "A jury convicted the defendants on the sabotage count and the injury-to-property count."
After entering the compound, the activists went into a Department of Energy building which contained enriched uranium and "pray-painted antiwar slogans, hung crime tape and banners with biblical phrases, splashed blood, and sang hymns," the ruling states. They also struck the building with small hammers, which delayed a shipment that was scheduled to arrive that afternoon.
"No rational jury could find that the defendants had that intent when they cut the fences; they did not cut them to allow al Qaeda to slip in behind," the ruling continues. "Nor could a rational jury find that the defendants had that intent when they engaged in their protest activities outside the [Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility]."
As Kevin Gosztola wrote last week at Firedoglake, "Such a conclusion is a huge victory for activists, because it means the government cannot stand in court and equate an act of protest with sabotage without evidence of motive."
"The purpose of the action of Michael, Megan and Greg was to call attention to the ongoing production of thermonuclear weapons components at the bomb plant in Oak Ridge and, more specifically, to oppose plans to build a new, multi-billion dollar bomb plant--the Uranium Processing Facility--at Y12," said Ralph Hutchison, coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, after the decision was announced. "They were nonviolent protestors in the tradition of Gandhi, not saboteurs. We are pleased the Sixth Circuit appreciated the difference."
It is unclear when the re-sentencing will take place.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.