'Distrust Reinforced' as NY Judge Rules Against Releasing Details of Eric Garner Grand Jury
Court has decided to 'perpetuate secrecy rather than promote transparency,' NYCLU says
Grand jury testimony in the chokehold death of Eric Garner will not be released because there was no "compelling reason" to publish the documents, a Staten Island judge ruled on Thursday in response to a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union.
The NYCLU in December petitioned the court to release testimony, evidence, and the instructions given to the jury that ultimately cleared NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo of any wrongdoing in Garner's death, which was ruled a homicide due to compression of neck and chest in a police brutality incident captured on video last July. The grand jury's decision not to indict Pantaleo fueled ongoing civil rights protests against racial profiling and police brutality.
"The failure to indict the officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner has left many wondering if black lives even matter. Sadly, today's decision will only leave many asking that same question again."
--Dana Lieberman, NYCLU"The outcome of grand jury proceeding has left many questions as to whether secret grand jury proceedings are instruments of injustice and whether the grand jury system should be abolished," NYCLU's motion stated. "The Garner grand jury is central to that public discussion. And it is important to that conversation for the public to know how and why the grand jury reached the conclusions that it did."
Judge William Garnett disagreed. "What would they use the minutes for?" he wrote in his decision (pdf) on Thursday. "The only answer which the court heard was the possibility of effecting legislative change. That proffered need is purely speculative and does not satisfy the requirements of the law."
Following the ruling, NYCLU legal director Arthur Eisenberg released a statement criticizing the court's decision to "perpetuate secrecy rather than promote transparency."
"In doing so, the court has reinforced the distrust many New Yorkers already feel toward the performance of the criminal justice system in this case," Eisenberg said. "Under the law, there is a presumption in favor of grand jury secrecy. But that presumption is not absolute. The court has the discretion to order disclosure under compelling circumstances which were certainly present here."
NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman added, "The failure to indict the officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner has left many wondering if black lives even matter. Sadly, today's decision will only leave many asking that same question again."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Grand jury testimony in the chokehold death of Eric Garner will not be released because there was no "compelling reason" to publish the documents, a Staten Island judge ruled on Thursday in response to a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union.
The NYCLU in December petitioned the court to release testimony, evidence, and the instructions given to the jury that ultimately cleared NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo of any wrongdoing in Garner's death, which was ruled a homicide due to compression of neck and chest in a police brutality incident captured on video last July. The grand jury's decision not to indict Pantaleo fueled ongoing civil rights protests against racial profiling and police brutality.
"The failure to indict the officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner has left many wondering if black lives even matter. Sadly, today's decision will only leave many asking that same question again."
--Dana Lieberman, NYCLU"The outcome of grand jury proceeding has left many questions as to whether secret grand jury proceedings are instruments of injustice and whether the grand jury system should be abolished," NYCLU's motion stated. "The Garner grand jury is central to that public discussion. And it is important to that conversation for the public to know how and why the grand jury reached the conclusions that it did."
Judge William Garnett disagreed. "What would they use the minutes for?" he wrote in his decision (pdf) on Thursday. "The only answer which the court heard was the possibility of effecting legislative change. That proffered need is purely speculative and does not satisfy the requirements of the law."
Following the ruling, NYCLU legal director Arthur Eisenberg released a statement criticizing the court's decision to "perpetuate secrecy rather than promote transparency."
"In doing so, the court has reinforced the distrust many New Yorkers already feel toward the performance of the criminal justice system in this case," Eisenberg said. "Under the law, there is a presumption in favor of grand jury secrecy. But that presumption is not absolute. The court has the discretion to order disclosure under compelling circumstances which were certainly present here."
NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman added, "The failure to indict the officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner has left many wondering if black lives even matter. Sadly, today's decision will only leave many asking that same question again."
Grand jury testimony in the chokehold death of Eric Garner will not be released because there was no "compelling reason" to publish the documents, a Staten Island judge ruled on Thursday in response to a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union.
The NYCLU in December petitioned the court to release testimony, evidence, and the instructions given to the jury that ultimately cleared NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo of any wrongdoing in Garner's death, which was ruled a homicide due to compression of neck and chest in a police brutality incident captured on video last July. The grand jury's decision not to indict Pantaleo fueled ongoing civil rights protests against racial profiling and police brutality.
"The failure to indict the officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner has left many wondering if black lives even matter. Sadly, today's decision will only leave many asking that same question again."
--Dana Lieberman, NYCLU"The outcome of grand jury proceeding has left many questions as to whether secret grand jury proceedings are instruments of injustice and whether the grand jury system should be abolished," NYCLU's motion stated. "The Garner grand jury is central to that public discussion. And it is important to that conversation for the public to know how and why the grand jury reached the conclusions that it did."
Judge William Garnett disagreed. "What would they use the minutes for?" he wrote in his decision (pdf) on Thursday. "The only answer which the court heard was the possibility of effecting legislative change. That proffered need is purely speculative and does not satisfy the requirements of the law."
Following the ruling, NYCLU legal director Arthur Eisenberg released a statement criticizing the court's decision to "perpetuate secrecy rather than promote transparency."
"In doing so, the court has reinforced the distrust many New Yorkers already feel toward the performance of the criminal justice system in this case," Eisenberg said. "Under the law, there is a presumption in favor of grand jury secrecy. But that presumption is not absolute. The court has the discretion to order disclosure under compelling circumstances which were certainly present here."
NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman added, "The failure to indict the officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner has left many wondering if black lives even matter. Sadly, today's decision will only leave many asking that same question again."