Sanders: New Report Shows Voter ID Laws Are 'Intended to Discourage Voting'
GAO study reveals two states with such laws had lower turnout, and more greatly impacted African-Americans
Laws that require voters to present identification at the polls reduced voter turnout in the 2008 and 2012 general elections, according to a report released Wednesday from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Further, voter ID laws decreased turnout to a greater degree among new, young, and African-American voters.
The GAO's analysis looked at turnout in Kansas and Tennessee, which have voter ID laws, compared to four other states--Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, and Maine.
Republicans have touted voter ID laws as necessary to prevent voter fraud.
However, the congressional watchdog states that "the studies GAO reviewed identified few instances of in-person voter fraud," though it noted that there are challenges to gathering information needed to make such estimates.
The report comes as a result of a 2012 request from Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), after what they saw as an "alarming number" of new state laws that they said could make it more difficult to vote.
"We must make it easier, not harder, for poor and working people to vote and to participate in the political process," Sen. Sanders said in a statement following the release of the GAO report.
"These state laws aren't really intended to discourage fraud, they're intended to discourage voting. The GAO looked at study after study and found no credible evidence of voter fraud having had any impact whatsoever on the outcome of any election in recent history," he continued.
Sen. Leahy added, "The right to vote is fundamental and foundational to our democracy."
"Each generation has a role to play in safeguarding this constitutional right. This new analysis from GAO reaffirms what many in Congress already know: Threats to the right to vote still exist. That is why Congress must act to restore the fundamental protections of the Voting Rights Act that have been gutted by the Supreme Court," Leahy said.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Laws that require voters to present identification at the polls reduced voter turnout in the 2008 and 2012 general elections, according to a report released Wednesday from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Further, voter ID laws decreased turnout to a greater degree among new, young, and African-American voters.
The GAO's analysis looked at turnout in Kansas and Tennessee, which have voter ID laws, compared to four other states--Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, and Maine.
Republicans have touted voter ID laws as necessary to prevent voter fraud.
However, the congressional watchdog states that "the studies GAO reviewed identified few instances of in-person voter fraud," though it noted that there are challenges to gathering information needed to make such estimates.
The report comes as a result of a 2012 request from Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), after what they saw as an "alarming number" of new state laws that they said could make it more difficult to vote.
"We must make it easier, not harder, for poor and working people to vote and to participate in the political process," Sen. Sanders said in a statement following the release of the GAO report.
"These state laws aren't really intended to discourage fraud, they're intended to discourage voting. The GAO looked at study after study and found no credible evidence of voter fraud having had any impact whatsoever on the outcome of any election in recent history," he continued.
Sen. Leahy added, "The right to vote is fundamental and foundational to our democracy."
"Each generation has a role to play in safeguarding this constitutional right. This new analysis from GAO reaffirms what many in Congress already know: Threats to the right to vote still exist. That is why Congress must act to restore the fundamental protections of the Voting Rights Act that have been gutted by the Supreme Court," Leahy said.
Laws that require voters to present identification at the polls reduced voter turnout in the 2008 and 2012 general elections, according to a report released Wednesday from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Further, voter ID laws decreased turnout to a greater degree among new, young, and African-American voters.
The GAO's analysis looked at turnout in Kansas and Tennessee, which have voter ID laws, compared to four other states--Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, and Maine.
Republicans have touted voter ID laws as necessary to prevent voter fraud.
However, the congressional watchdog states that "the studies GAO reviewed identified few instances of in-person voter fraud," though it noted that there are challenges to gathering information needed to make such estimates.
The report comes as a result of a 2012 request from Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), after what they saw as an "alarming number" of new state laws that they said could make it more difficult to vote.
"We must make it easier, not harder, for poor and working people to vote and to participate in the political process," Sen. Sanders said in a statement following the release of the GAO report.
"These state laws aren't really intended to discourage fraud, they're intended to discourage voting. The GAO looked at study after study and found no credible evidence of voter fraud having had any impact whatsoever on the outcome of any election in recent history," he continued.
Sen. Leahy added, "The right to vote is fundamental and foundational to our democracy."
"Each generation has a role to play in safeguarding this constitutional right. This new analysis from GAO reaffirms what many in Congress already know: Threats to the right to vote still exist. That is why Congress must act to restore the fundamental protections of the Voting Rights Act that have been gutted by the Supreme Court," Leahy said.