Photo: Wikimedia Creative Commons / DangApricot)
Jul 08, 2014
If the the highest U.S. court says the corporation Hobby Lobby is an entity that deserves religious rights, what about the actual people being held in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
So argue lawsuits filed last week on behalf of Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen, who have been held at this notorious offshore prison without charge or trial since 2002.
In the emergency motions, the men charge that prison authorities are denying them the right to participate in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike. According to the petitions, this practice is not new but continues from 2013 Ramadan, during which prison authorities forced men to stop hunger striking in order to participate in communal prayers.
"The fact that Petitioner is engaged in a peaceful hunger strike should not deprive him of his religious free exercise rights," the motions read.
While U.S. courts had previously ruled that people held at Guantanamo Bay do not have religious rights because they are not "persons" with respect to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the petitioners argue that this month's Burwell v. Hobby Lobby ruling highlights that those decisions "are not good law."
The controversial Hobby Lobby decision ruled that an employer can refuse contraception to workers under the Affordable Care Act on the grounds of religious objection--outraging public health and reproductive justice advocates across the United States.
The petitioners argue, "Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons--human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien--enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the RFRA."
"Having held my clients without charge or trial for a dozen years, the authorities at Gitmo are now trying to break their will by denying even the most basic religious liberty - the right to pray with others of their faith," said Cori Crider, attorney for the men and a director at human rights organization Reprieve, in a statement released Tuesday.
The petitions are the latest in a litany of accusations that people held in Guantanamo are denied their most basic human and religious rights.
A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to respond by the end of the day Tuesday, and a court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
"I look forward to the Obama Administration's explanation of why, if Hobby Lobby is a person with religious rights, a Guantanamo detainee isn't," Crider added.
_____________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
If the the highest U.S. court says the corporation Hobby Lobby is an entity that deserves religious rights, what about the actual people being held in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
So argue lawsuits filed last week on behalf of Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen, who have been held at this notorious offshore prison without charge or trial since 2002.
In the emergency motions, the men charge that prison authorities are denying them the right to participate in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike. According to the petitions, this practice is not new but continues from 2013 Ramadan, during which prison authorities forced men to stop hunger striking in order to participate in communal prayers.
"The fact that Petitioner is engaged in a peaceful hunger strike should not deprive him of his religious free exercise rights," the motions read.
While U.S. courts had previously ruled that people held at Guantanamo Bay do not have religious rights because they are not "persons" with respect to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the petitioners argue that this month's Burwell v. Hobby Lobby ruling highlights that those decisions "are not good law."
The controversial Hobby Lobby decision ruled that an employer can refuse contraception to workers under the Affordable Care Act on the grounds of religious objection--outraging public health and reproductive justice advocates across the United States.
The petitioners argue, "Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons--human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien--enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the RFRA."
"Having held my clients without charge or trial for a dozen years, the authorities at Gitmo are now trying to break their will by denying even the most basic religious liberty - the right to pray with others of their faith," said Cori Crider, attorney for the men and a director at human rights organization Reprieve, in a statement released Tuesday.
The petitions are the latest in a litany of accusations that people held in Guantanamo are denied their most basic human and religious rights.
A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to respond by the end of the day Tuesday, and a court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
"I look forward to the Obama Administration's explanation of why, if Hobby Lobby is a person with religious rights, a Guantanamo detainee isn't," Crider added.
_____________________
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
If the the highest U.S. court says the corporation Hobby Lobby is an entity that deserves religious rights, what about the actual people being held in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
So argue lawsuits filed last week on behalf of Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen, who have been held at this notorious offshore prison without charge or trial since 2002.
In the emergency motions, the men charge that prison authorities are denying them the right to participate in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike. According to the petitions, this practice is not new but continues from 2013 Ramadan, during which prison authorities forced men to stop hunger striking in order to participate in communal prayers.
"The fact that Petitioner is engaged in a peaceful hunger strike should not deprive him of his religious free exercise rights," the motions read.
While U.S. courts had previously ruled that people held at Guantanamo Bay do not have religious rights because they are not "persons" with respect to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the petitioners argue that this month's Burwell v. Hobby Lobby ruling highlights that those decisions "are not good law."
The controversial Hobby Lobby decision ruled that an employer can refuse contraception to workers under the Affordable Care Act on the grounds of religious objection--outraging public health and reproductive justice advocates across the United States.
The petitioners argue, "Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons--human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien--enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the RFRA."
"Having held my clients without charge or trial for a dozen years, the authorities at Gitmo are now trying to break their will by denying even the most basic religious liberty - the right to pray with others of their faith," said Cori Crider, attorney for the men and a director at human rights organization Reprieve, in a statement released Tuesday.
The petitions are the latest in a litany of accusations that people held in Guantanamo are denied their most basic human and religious rights.
A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to respond by the end of the day Tuesday, and a court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
"I look forward to the Obama Administration's explanation of why, if Hobby Lobby is a person with religious rights, a Guantanamo detainee isn't," Crider added.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.