

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
If the the highest U.S. court says the corporation Hobby Lobby is an entity that deserves religious rights, what about the actual people being held in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
So argue lawsuits filed last week on behalf of Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen, who have been held at this notorious offshore prison without charge or trial since 2002.
In the emergency motions, the men charge that prison authorities are denying them the right to participate in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike. According to the petitions, this practice is not new but continues from 2013 Ramadan, during which prison authorities forced men to stop hunger striking in order to participate in communal prayers.
"The fact that Petitioner is engaged in a peaceful hunger strike should not deprive him of his religious free exercise rights," the motions read.
While U.S. courts had previously ruled that people held at Guantanamo Bay do not have religious rights because they are not "persons" with respect to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the petitioners argue that this month's Burwell v. Hobby Lobby ruling highlights that those decisions "are not good law."
The controversial Hobby Lobby decision ruled that an employer can refuse contraception to workers under the Affordable Care Act on the grounds of religious objection--outraging public health and reproductive justice advocates across the United States.
The petitioners argue, "Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons--human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien--enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the RFRA."
"Having held my clients without charge or trial for a dozen years, the authorities at Gitmo are now trying to break their will by denying even the most basic religious liberty - the right to pray with others of their faith," said Cori Crider, attorney for the men and a director at human rights organization Reprieve, in a statement released Tuesday.
The petitions are the latest in a litany of accusations that people held in Guantanamo are denied their most basic human and religious rights.
A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to respond by the end of the day Tuesday, and a court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
"I look forward to the Obama Administration's explanation of why, if Hobby Lobby is a person with religious rights, a Guantanamo detainee isn't," Crider added.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
If the the highest U.S. court says the corporation Hobby Lobby is an entity that deserves religious rights, what about the actual people being held in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
So argue lawsuits filed last week on behalf of Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen, who have been held at this notorious offshore prison without charge or trial since 2002.
In the emergency motions, the men charge that prison authorities are denying them the right to participate in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike. According to the petitions, this practice is not new but continues from 2013 Ramadan, during which prison authorities forced men to stop hunger striking in order to participate in communal prayers.
"The fact that Petitioner is engaged in a peaceful hunger strike should not deprive him of his religious free exercise rights," the motions read.
While U.S. courts had previously ruled that people held at Guantanamo Bay do not have religious rights because they are not "persons" with respect to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the petitioners argue that this month's Burwell v. Hobby Lobby ruling highlights that those decisions "are not good law."
The controversial Hobby Lobby decision ruled that an employer can refuse contraception to workers under the Affordable Care Act on the grounds of religious objection--outraging public health and reproductive justice advocates across the United States.
The petitioners argue, "Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons--human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien--enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the RFRA."
"Having held my clients without charge or trial for a dozen years, the authorities at Gitmo are now trying to break their will by denying even the most basic religious liberty - the right to pray with others of their faith," said Cori Crider, attorney for the men and a director at human rights organization Reprieve, in a statement released Tuesday.
The petitions are the latest in a litany of accusations that people held in Guantanamo are denied their most basic human and religious rights.
A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to respond by the end of the day Tuesday, and a court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
"I look forward to the Obama Administration's explanation of why, if Hobby Lobby is a person with religious rights, a Guantanamo detainee isn't," Crider added.
_____________________
If the the highest U.S. court says the corporation Hobby Lobby is an entity that deserves religious rights, what about the actual people being held in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
So argue lawsuits filed last week on behalf of Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen, who have been held at this notorious offshore prison without charge or trial since 2002.
In the emergency motions, the men charge that prison authorities are denying them the right to participate in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike. According to the petitions, this practice is not new but continues from 2013 Ramadan, during which prison authorities forced men to stop hunger striking in order to participate in communal prayers.
"The fact that Petitioner is engaged in a peaceful hunger strike should not deprive him of his religious free exercise rights," the motions read.
While U.S. courts had previously ruled that people held at Guantanamo Bay do not have religious rights because they are not "persons" with respect to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the petitioners argue that this month's Burwell v. Hobby Lobby ruling highlights that those decisions "are not good law."
The controversial Hobby Lobby decision ruled that an employer can refuse contraception to workers under the Affordable Care Act on the grounds of religious objection--outraging public health and reproductive justice advocates across the United States.
The petitioners argue, "Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons--human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien--enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the RFRA."
"Having held my clients without charge or trial for a dozen years, the authorities at Gitmo are now trying to break their will by denying even the most basic religious liberty - the right to pray with others of their faith," said Cori Crider, attorney for the men and a director at human rights organization Reprieve, in a statement released Tuesday.
The petitions are the latest in a litany of accusations that people held in Guantanamo are denied their most basic human and religious rights.
A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to respond by the end of the day Tuesday, and a court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
"I look forward to the Obama Administration's explanation of why, if Hobby Lobby is a person with religious rights, a Guantanamo detainee isn't," Crider added.
_____________________