Coal mining operation in New Mexico. (photo: flickr / cc / Don Searls)
Jul 07, 2014
Pending lawsuits in three states could have far-reaching implications for the coal-mining industry, as the U.S. Department of Interior has been charged with too quickly rubber-stamping coal-mining operations without adequate public input or consideration of pollution impact.
Filed by the environmental group WildEarth Guardians, the lawsuits take the Interior Department to task for what is described as "a chronic failure ... to involve the public and address the potentially significant environmental and economic impacts of coal mining throughout the Rocky Mountain West." They call for the government to shut down mining operations until more complete environmental reviews are completed.
While the lawsuits deal with four specific mines, the fallout from the civil cases could be more far-reaching, due to how many mines have been approved via the same process.
"If WildEarth's request for relief is granted ... the result would be devastating economic harm to coal miners, operators and the entire industry that services coal production," mining association attorney Stephen Bell wrote in a recent court brief, as reported by the Associated Press.
Under federal law, the Interior Department has to approve a "Mining Plan" before a company can mine federal coal reserves. The plans must demonstrate compliance with federal regulations and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), looking at how mining would impact air and water quality both now and in the future.
In the case of four mines in Colorado, Montana, and New Mexico, the Department signed off on Mining Plans that failed "to accurately consider potentially significant direct and indirect environmental impacts in accordance with NEPA," the lawsuits read.
In particular, WildEarth alleges that the Department failed to give sufficient public notice about environmental analyses, approved plans that employed outdated information and standards, and ignored blatant public health risks. The Trapper mine in Colorado, for example, is currently in violation of the Clean Air Act and has exceeded its water pollution limits by more than 1,000 percent, according to WildEarth.
"Without any public knowledge, Interior has given the green light for coal companies to despoil our air, our water, and our land," said Jeremy Nichols, WildEarth Guardians' Climate and Energy Program Director. "It's bad enough that that Interior is approving this kind of dirty energy development in secret, but it's also doing so without consideration of the environmental implications. The public deserves better."
Attorneys for the federal government deny any wrongdoing and have asked for the case to be dismissed.
_____________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Pending lawsuits in three states could have far-reaching implications for the coal-mining industry, as the U.S. Department of Interior has been charged with too quickly rubber-stamping coal-mining operations without adequate public input or consideration of pollution impact.
Filed by the environmental group WildEarth Guardians, the lawsuits take the Interior Department to task for what is described as "a chronic failure ... to involve the public and address the potentially significant environmental and economic impacts of coal mining throughout the Rocky Mountain West." They call for the government to shut down mining operations until more complete environmental reviews are completed.
While the lawsuits deal with four specific mines, the fallout from the civil cases could be more far-reaching, due to how many mines have been approved via the same process.
"If WildEarth's request for relief is granted ... the result would be devastating economic harm to coal miners, operators and the entire industry that services coal production," mining association attorney Stephen Bell wrote in a recent court brief, as reported by the Associated Press.
Under federal law, the Interior Department has to approve a "Mining Plan" before a company can mine federal coal reserves. The plans must demonstrate compliance with federal regulations and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), looking at how mining would impact air and water quality both now and in the future.
In the case of four mines in Colorado, Montana, and New Mexico, the Department signed off on Mining Plans that failed "to accurately consider potentially significant direct and indirect environmental impacts in accordance with NEPA," the lawsuits read.
In particular, WildEarth alleges that the Department failed to give sufficient public notice about environmental analyses, approved plans that employed outdated information and standards, and ignored blatant public health risks. The Trapper mine in Colorado, for example, is currently in violation of the Clean Air Act and has exceeded its water pollution limits by more than 1,000 percent, according to WildEarth.
"Without any public knowledge, Interior has given the green light for coal companies to despoil our air, our water, and our land," said Jeremy Nichols, WildEarth Guardians' Climate and Energy Program Director. "It's bad enough that that Interior is approving this kind of dirty energy development in secret, but it's also doing so without consideration of the environmental implications. The public deserves better."
Attorneys for the federal government deny any wrongdoing and have asked for the case to be dismissed.
_____________________
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Pending lawsuits in three states could have far-reaching implications for the coal-mining industry, as the U.S. Department of Interior has been charged with too quickly rubber-stamping coal-mining operations without adequate public input or consideration of pollution impact.
Filed by the environmental group WildEarth Guardians, the lawsuits take the Interior Department to task for what is described as "a chronic failure ... to involve the public and address the potentially significant environmental and economic impacts of coal mining throughout the Rocky Mountain West." They call for the government to shut down mining operations until more complete environmental reviews are completed.
While the lawsuits deal with four specific mines, the fallout from the civil cases could be more far-reaching, due to how many mines have been approved via the same process.
"If WildEarth's request for relief is granted ... the result would be devastating economic harm to coal miners, operators and the entire industry that services coal production," mining association attorney Stephen Bell wrote in a recent court brief, as reported by the Associated Press.
Under federal law, the Interior Department has to approve a "Mining Plan" before a company can mine federal coal reserves. The plans must demonstrate compliance with federal regulations and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), looking at how mining would impact air and water quality both now and in the future.
In the case of four mines in Colorado, Montana, and New Mexico, the Department signed off on Mining Plans that failed "to accurately consider potentially significant direct and indirect environmental impacts in accordance with NEPA," the lawsuits read.
In particular, WildEarth alleges that the Department failed to give sufficient public notice about environmental analyses, approved plans that employed outdated information and standards, and ignored blatant public health risks. The Trapper mine in Colorado, for example, is currently in violation of the Clean Air Act and has exceeded its water pollution limits by more than 1,000 percent, according to WildEarth.
"Without any public knowledge, Interior has given the green light for coal companies to despoil our air, our water, and our land," said Jeremy Nichols, WildEarth Guardians' Climate and Energy Program Director. "It's bad enough that that Interior is approving this kind of dirty energy development in secret, but it's also doing so without consideration of the environmental implications. The public deserves better."
Attorneys for the federal government deny any wrongdoing and have asked for the case to be dismissed.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.