Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Protesters denounced what they called the "racist and offensive" team name outside of a Washington Redskins game in Denver. (Photo: Confrontation Media/ cc/ Flickr)

Protesters denounced what they called the "racist and offensive" team name outside of a Washington Redskins game in Denver. (Photo: Confrontation Media/ cc/ Flickr)

Victory for Native Americans as Redskins Trademarks Pulled

Federal board rules that team name is 'disparaging' to Native Americans

Lauren McCauley

In a landmark rebuke of the controversial NFL brand, the federal patent office on Wednesday canceled the Washington Redskins' official trademark registration.

“It is a great victory for Native Americans and for all Americans," said plaintiff Amanda Blackhorse in a statement quoted by Think Progress. "I hope this ruling brings us a step closer to that inevitable day when the name of the Washington football team will be changed. The team’s name is racist and derogatory. I’ve said it before and I will say it again – if people wouldn’t dare call a Native American a ‘redskin’ because they know it is offensive, how can an NFL football team have this name?”

Blackhorse was one of five Native Americans represented in the suit Blackhorse v. Pro -Football, Inc. who sought the cancellation of six different trademarks associated with the Washington D.C. team, each containing the word "redskin," on the grounds that the term denigrates Native Americans.

In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that the term violates federal trademark law, which does not permit the registration of trademarks that “may disparage” individuals or groups or “bring them into contempt or disrepute.”

During the trial, prosecuting attorneys with the firm Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP showed a series of images and otherevidence to convince the court that the term "redskins" both refers to and is "disparaging" toward Native Americans.

Responding to the ruling, the team released an official statement by their trademark attorney saying the board's decision "will have no effect at all on the team’s ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo," and vowed to appeal.

Despite the mounting outcry over the racist overtones of the term, Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder has vowed that he will "never" change the team's name.

Though the ruling itself will not force such a change, as USA Today sports journalist Erik Brady explained, it may threaten the teams ability to protect their brand or prevent others from selling items with the team's logo.

More significantly, Brady notes, the cancellation of the trademarks "would serve as the latest clarion call in a rising tide of pressure on the team and the league."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

11 Senators Support House Progressives' Push to Pass Full Biden Agenda

"We voted for the bipartisan infrastructure bill with the clear commitment that the two pieces of the package would move together along a dual track."

Jessica Corbett ·

Ex-Prisoners Recall US Torture at 'Afghanistan's Abu Ghraib'

"It is psychologically hard for me to recall all that was happening," said one former Bagram Air Base inmate. "The torture was mostly done by Afghans, sometimes the Americans. But the orders came from the U.S."

Brett Wilkins ·

Rapid Shift to Electric Vehicles Could Create Over 150,000 Jobs in US by 2030

A new report says "smart" pro-labor policies by lawmakers would transform the "inevitable" shift to EVs "into a new beginning for U.S. producers and the rebuilding of a foundation for good jobs."

Kenny Stancil ·

'Groundbreaking' Win as Court Rules USFWS Can't Ignore Climate Impacts on Joshua Tree

The ruling represents a step forward "for all climate-imperiled species whose fate relies upon the service following the law," said advocacy group WildEarth Guardians.

Julia Conley ·

WHO's New Air Pollution Guidelines Reflect Deadly Toll of Fossil Fuels

"What matters most is whether governments implement impactful policies to reduce pollutant emissions, such as ending investments in coal, oil, and gas and prioritizing the transition to clean energy," said a Greenpeace scientist.

Jessica Corbett ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo