SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A Greenpeace campaigner holds a banner atop a building at the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant in France earlier this year. (Credit: flickr / Greenpeace France)
Solar and Wind Will Be Cheaper Than Nukes by End of Decade: Greenpeace
New report shows nuclear-dependent France has historic opportunity, and enormous financial incentive, to move towards renewables
Jun 13, 2014
A new report by Greenpeace in France shows that renewable energy sources like photovoltaic solar and wind will be more affordable than nuclear power by the end of the decade.
As France rushes to make expensive upgrades to its aging nuclear plants in the midst of the ongoing Fuksuhima disaster in Japan, the report (published here in French) shows that maintaining the nation's dependence on atomic energy no longer makes financial sense.
According to Reuters, the Greenpace study comes a week before French Energy Minister Segolene Royal "presents the broad lines of a much-delayed framework energy law that aims to spell out how France will cut the share of atomic energy to 50 percent from the current 75 percent by 2025."
As the solar energy industry website PVTech reports:
Nuclear upgrades under new European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) standards would push nuclear prices to EUR133 per MWh (US$180 MWh), with EUR4.4 billion (US$6.0 billion) of investment per reactor required.
Increasing the costs and financial risk of EPRs are operating costs, wall investment, improving safety and erosion of profitability, the report claimed.
Compared to renewables nuclear will be more expensive than onshore wind (at EUR40-80 per MWh by 2018), and more expensive than solar and offshore wind power by 2020.
The report urges government to take control of nuclear power, future nuclear generation, and the financial future of the country.
________________________________
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new report by Greenpeace in France shows that renewable energy sources like photovoltaic solar and wind will be more affordable than nuclear power by the end of the decade.
As France rushes to make expensive upgrades to its aging nuclear plants in the midst of the ongoing Fuksuhima disaster in Japan, the report (published here in French) shows that maintaining the nation's dependence on atomic energy no longer makes financial sense.
According to Reuters, the Greenpace study comes a week before French Energy Minister Segolene Royal "presents the broad lines of a much-delayed framework energy law that aims to spell out how France will cut the share of atomic energy to 50 percent from the current 75 percent by 2025."
As the solar energy industry website PVTech reports:
Nuclear upgrades under new European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) standards would push nuclear prices to EUR133 per MWh (US$180 MWh), with EUR4.4 billion (US$6.0 billion) of investment per reactor required.
Increasing the costs and financial risk of EPRs are operating costs, wall investment, improving safety and erosion of profitability, the report claimed.
Compared to renewables nuclear will be more expensive than onshore wind (at EUR40-80 per MWh by 2018), and more expensive than solar and offshore wind power by 2020.
The report urges government to take control of nuclear power, future nuclear generation, and the financial future of the country.
________________________________
A new report by Greenpeace in France shows that renewable energy sources like photovoltaic solar and wind will be more affordable than nuclear power by the end of the decade.
As France rushes to make expensive upgrades to its aging nuclear plants in the midst of the ongoing Fuksuhima disaster in Japan, the report (published here in French) shows that maintaining the nation's dependence on atomic energy no longer makes financial sense.
According to Reuters, the Greenpace study comes a week before French Energy Minister Segolene Royal "presents the broad lines of a much-delayed framework energy law that aims to spell out how France will cut the share of atomic energy to 50 percent from the current 75 percent by 2025."
As the solar energy industry website PVTech reports:
Nuclear upgrades under new European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) standards would push nuclear prices to EUR133 per MWh (US$180 MWh), with EUR4.4 billion (US$6.0 billion) of investment per reactor required.
Increasing the costs and financial risk of EPRs are operating costs, wall investment, improving safety and erosion of profitability, the report claimed.
Compared to renewables nuclear will be more expensive than onshore wind (at EUR40-80 per MWh by 2018), and more expensive than solar and offshore wind power by 2020.
The report urges government to take control of nuclear power, future nuclear generation, and the financial future of the country.
________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.