Great Barrier Reef Facing 'Unprecedented' Threat from Coal Expansion
Report slams Australian government for poor stewardship of the World Heritage site
The Great Barrier Reef is facing "unprecedented industrial development," and the damage wrought by seabed dredging as a result coal industry expansion has been significantly downplayed by the state government and mining industry, a conservation watchdog charged in a new report issued Wednesday.
"The state government is both the owner and the overseer of these dredging projects, which means that it is essentially checking its own homework and giving itself top marks," said Felicity Wishart, campaign director for the Australian Marine Conservation Society which authored the report.
To accommodate the expansion of coal export terminals along the coastline of the UNESCO World Heritage site, an average of nearly one million cubic meters of underwater soil has been dug up within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park each year for the past ten years.
Despite claims by the Australian government that this dredging has not inflicted any damage on the reef, the report--Dredging, Dumping and the Great Barrier Reef (pdf)--found a "deeply troubling" lack of monitoring of coral health. Further, the group uncovered coral "covered with lesions," that were not reported.
"In the monitoring report, corals with dead patches were grouped together with coral that had no damage at all, obscuring the fact that these corals were damaged," said Wishart.
Coral scientist Dr. Selina Ward added that some corals had up to 60% coverage by sediment, which she said "would have been damaging."
"How did they cope into the future?" Ward asked of the coral. "We don't know because the monitoring stopped six months after the dredging."
The report highlights the untold harms to the underwater ecosystem caused by digging up undersea soil. Clouds of sediment called 'dredge plumes' block sunlight, hindering the growth of seagrass and coral. Also, the stirring up of pollutants buried in the sea floor can be "toxic to marine life," the authors note.
If the state proceeds with further expansion proposals, there could be a 3000% increase in the dumping of "dredge spoil" in the park, or a total of 83 million cubic meters of dredging in the Reef's waters. "The industrialization of the Reef's coast through expanded ports will continue to cause environmental damage to the Reef if it goes ahead," added Wishart.
The report follows threats made last week by UNESCO to re-list the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park as a World Heritage in Danger site due to the "range of significant threats affecting the property and the conflicting information about the effectiveness of recent decisions and draft policies" in the protection of the property, saying that the organization has "significant concern" over the long-term deterioration of the site's Outstanding Universal Value.
_____________________
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Great Barrier Reef is facing "unprecedented industrial development," and the damage wrought by seabed dredging as a result coal industry expansion has been significantly downplayed by the state government and mining industry, a conservation watchdog charged in a new report issued Wednesday.
"The state government is both the owner and the overseer of these dredging projects, which means that it is essentially checking its own homework and giving itself top marks," said Felicity Wishart, campaign director for the Australian Marine Conservation Society which authored the report.
To accommodate the expansion of coal export terminals along the coastline of the UNESCO World Heritage site, an average of nearly one million cubic meters of underwater soil has been dug up within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park each year for the past ten years.
Despite claims by the Australian government that this dredging has not inflicted any damage on the reef, the report--Dredging, Dumping and the Great Barrier Reef (pdf)--found a "deeply troubling" lack of monitoring of coral health. Further, the group uncovered coral "covered with lesions," that were not reported.
"In the monitoring report, corals with dead patches were grouped together with coral that had no damage at all, obscuring the fact that these corals were damaged," said Wishart.
Coral scientist Dr. Selina Ward added that some corals had up to 60% coverage by sediment, which she said "would have been damaging."
"How did they cope into the future?" Ward asked of the coral. "We don't know because the monitoring stopped six months after the dredging."
The report highlights the untold harms to the underwater ecosystem caused by digging up undersea soil. Clouds of sediment called 'dredge plumes' block sunlight, hindering the growth of seagrass and coral. Also, the stirring up of pollutants buried in the sea floor can be "toxic to marine life," the authors note.
If the state proceeds with further expansion proposals, there could be a 3000% increase in the dumping of "dredge spoil" in the park, or a total of 83 million cubic meters of dredging in the Reef's waters. "The industrialization of the Reef's coast through expanded ports will continue to cause environmental damage to the Reef if it goes ahead," added Wishart.
The report follows threats made last week by UNESCO to re-list the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park as a World Heritage in Danger site due to the "range of significant threats affecting the property and the conflicting information about the effectiveness of recent decisions and draft policies" in the protection of the property, saying that the organization has "significant concern" over the long-term deterioration of the site's Outstanding Universal Value.
_____________________
The Great Barrier Reef is facing "unprecedented industrial development," and the damage wrought by seabed dredging as a result coal industry expansion has been significantly downplayed by the state government and mining industry, a conservation watchdog charged in a new report issued Wednesday.
"The state government is both the owner and the overseer of these dredging projects, which means that it is essentially checking its own homework and giving itself top marks," said Felicity Wishart, campaign director for the Australian Marine Conservation Society which authored the report.
To accommodate the expansion of coal export terminals along the coastline of the UNESCO World Heritage site, an average of nearly one million cubic meters of underwater soil has been dug up within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park each year for the past ten years.
Despite claims by the Australian government that this dredging has not inflicted any damage on the reef, the report--Dredging, Dumping and the Great Barrier Reef (pdf)--found a "deeply troubling" lack of monitoring of coral health. Further, the group uncovered coral "covered with lesions," that were not reported.
"In the monitoring report, corals with dead patches were grouped together with coral that had no damage at all, obscuring the fact that these corals were damaged," said Wishart.
Coral scientist Dr. Selina Ward added that some corals had up to 60% coverage by sediment, which she said "would have been damaging."
"How did they cope into the future?" Ward asked of the coral. "We don't know because the monitoring stopped six months after the dredging."
The report highlights the untold harms to the underwater ecosystem caused by digging up undersea soil. Clouds of sediment called 'dredge plumes' block sunlight, hindering the growth of seagrass and coral. Also, the stirring up of pollutants buried in the sea floor can be "toxic to marine life," the authors note.
If the state proceeds with further expansion proposals, there could be a 3000% increase in the dumping of "dredge spoil" in the park, or a total of 83 million cubic meters of dredging in the Reef's waters. "The industrialization of the Reef's coast through expanded ports will continue to cause environmental damage to the Reef if it goes ahead," added Wishart.
The report follows threats made last week by UNESCO to re-list the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park as a World Heritage in Danger site due to the "range of significant threats affecting the property and the conflicting information about the effectiveness of recent decisions and draft policies" in the protection of the property, saying that the organization has "significant concern" over the long-term deterioration of the site's Outstanding Universal Value.
_____________________