

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The Summary Offenses and Sentencing Amendment Bill has been widely criticized as a crackdown on freedom of expression and public protest, as well as an attack on marginalized, poor, homeless, and undocumented people.
When opponents of the bill voiced their opposition during debate in the chamber on Tuesday, security "proceeded to drag people by their arms, legs and their necks out of the gallery for daring to express the concerns of the community," said protester Samantha Castro in an interview with 7 News describing the scene, which was captured on the video below.
In addition, a riot police squad was called to the scene to disband the approximately 30 protesters. The demonstrators "were representative of a much larger movement, of many [thousands] of people who do not want to see democracy further stifled in this state," wrote Nicola Paris of nonviolent direct action group CounterAct, in a statement about the action.
Now passed, the bill drastically expands police powers to force individuals or groups of people in public places to "move on" on the suspicion that they will cause violence, obstruction, or sell drugs, and it expands powers to ban, imprison, and fine people who are deemed not in compliance.
"These laws will disproportionately affect marginalized young people, people experiencing homelessness, poverty, and mental health issues who occupy public spaces, both as a result of social choice and necessity," reads a statement from a coalition of Australian organizations that oppose the bill.
"By necessity, people experiencing homelessness live their lives in public places," reads a statement from Australian organization Justice Connect. "Unlike the rest of us who could go home if told to move-on, homeless people have no-where else to go."
Many suspect the law is aimed, in part, at stifling demonstrations and worker pickets in the state, including Melbourne protests against an East West Link Road under construction that critics charge would displace residents, contaminate the environment, and expand carbon pollution.
Describing the Tuesday protests, Paris wrote, "We were there for unionists, for teachers, for nurses, for people who fought for the rights we now have. We were there for environmentalists, for people who care for refugees, who care about the city we live in, and who have saved the buildings we now cherish. We were there for those defending their homes and communities from an unwanted road project that will bring no benefit but much pollution, at a cost of billions."
"This legislation is yet another step down the slippery slope. If we don't fight for our rights now, they will take them away."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

The Summary Offenses and Sentencing Amendment Bill has been widely criticized as a crackdown on freedom of expression and public protest, as well as an attack on marginalized, poor, homeless, and undocumented people.
When opponents of the bill voiced their opposition during debate in the chamber on Tuesday, security "proceeded to drag people by their arms, legs and their necks out of the gallery for daring to express the concerns of the community," said protester Samantha Castro in an interview with 7 News describing the scene, which was captured on the video below.
In addition, a riot police squad was called to the scene to disband the approximately 30 protesters. The demonstrators "were representative of a much larger movement, of many [thousands] of people who do not want to see democracy further stifled in this state," wrote Nicola Paris of nonviolent direct action group CounterAct, in a statement about the action.
Now passed, the bill drastically expands police powers to force individuals or groups of people in public places to "move on" on the suspicion that they will cause violence, obstruction, or sell drugs, and it expands powers to ban, imprison, and fine people who are deemed not in compliance.
"These laws will disproportionately affect marginalized young people, people experiencing homelessness, poverty, and mental health issues who occupy public spaces, both as a result of social choice and necessity," reads a statement from a coalition of Australian organizations that oppose the bill.
"By necessity, people experiencing homelessness live their lives in public places," reads a statement from Australian organization Justice Connect. "Unlike the rest of us who could go home if told to move-on, homeless people have no-where else to go."
Many suspect the law is aimed, in part, at stifling demonstrations and worker pickets in the state, including Melbourne protests against an East West Link Road under construction that critics charge would displace residents, contaminate the environment, and expand carbon pollution.
Describing the Tuesday protests, Paris wrote, "We were there for unionists, for teachers, for nurses, for people who fought for the rights we now have. We were there for environmentalists, for people who care for refugees, who care about the city we live in, and who have saved the buildings we now cherish. We were there for those defending their homes and communities from an unwanted road project that will bring no benefit but much pollution, at a cost of billions."
"This legislation is yet another step down the slippery slope. If we don't fight for our rights now, they will take them away."
_____________________

The Summary Offenses and Sentencing Amendment Bill has been widely criticized as a crackdown on freedom of expression and public protest, as well as an attack on marginalized, poor, homeless, and undocumented people.
When opponents of the bill voiced their opposition during debate in the chamber on Tuesday, security "proceeded to drag people by their arms, legs and their necks out of the gallery for daring to express the concerns of the community," said protester Samantha Castro in an interview with 7 News describing the scene, which was captured on the video below.
In addition, a riot police squad was called to the scene to disband the approximately 30 protesters. The demonstrators "were representative of a much larger movement, of many [thousands] of people who do not want to see democracy further stifled in this state," wrote Nicola Paris of nonviolent direct action group CounterAct, in a statement about the action.
Now passed, the bill drastically expands police powers to force individuals or groups of people in public places to "move on" on the suspicion that they will cause violence, obstruction, or sell drugs, and it expands powers to ban, imprison, and fine people who are deemed not in compliance.
"These laws will disproportionately affect marginalized young people, people experiencing homelessness, poverty, and mental health issues who occupy public spaces, both as a result of social choice and necessity," reads a statement from a coalition of Australian organizations that oppose the bill.
"By necessity, people experiencing homelessness live their lives in public places," reads a statement from Australian organization Justice Connect. "Unlike the rest of us who could go home if told to move-on, homeless people have no-where else to go."
Many suspect the law is aimed, in part, at stifling demonstrations and worker pickets in the state, including Melbourne protests against an East West Link Road under construction that critics charge would displace residents, contaminate the environment, and expand carbon pollution.
Describing the Tuesday protests, Paris wrote, "We were there for unionists, for teachers, for nurses, for people who fought for the rights we now have. We were there for environmentalists, for people who care for refugees, who care about the city we live in, and who have saved the buildings we now cherish. We were there for those defending their homes and communities from an unwanted road project that will bring no benefit but much pollution, at a cost of billions."
"This legislation is yet another step down the slippery slope. If we don't fight for our rights now, they will take them away."
_____________________