SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Today's court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedent," said U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia. "Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our U.S. Constitution."
The ruling will not go into effect immediately, as it awaits an appeal by the state. However, Garcia said the two couples who filed the lawsuit against the state are likely to win their case in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Following the ruling, Evan Wolfson, founder and president of marriage equality group Freedom to Marry, stated:
Today the 6th federal judge in a row has ruled - in Texas - that there is simply no legitimate justification for denying marriage to loving gay and lesbian couples. The court's holding is solid and serious, and follows the language and logic of the Supreme Court's marriage ruling last year and the Constitution's clear command. With 47 marriage cases in 25 states now moving forward, and the possibility that a freedom to marry case will again reach the Supreme Court as soon as 2015, we must continue the conversations and progress -- Texan to Texan, American to American -- that show that all of America is ready for the freedom to marry.
The ruling is the latest in a string of legal decisions to favor of same-sex marriage in predominantly conservative states including cases in Utah, Ohio, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Virginia.
______________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"Today's court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedent," said U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia. "Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our U.S. Constitution."
The ruling will not go into effect immediately, as it awaits an appeal by the state. However, Garcia said the two couples who filed the lawsuit against the state are likely to win their case in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Following the ruling, Evan Wolfson, founder and president of marriage equality group Freedom to Marry, stated:
Today the 6th federal judge in a row has ruled - in Texas - that there is simply no legitimate justification for denying marriage to loving gay and lesbian couples. The court's holding is solid and serious, and follows the language and logic of the Supreme Court's marriage ruling last year and the Constitution's clear command. With 47 marriage cases in 25 states now moving forward, and the possibility that a freedom to marry case will again reach the Supreme Court as soon as 2015, we must continue the conversations and progress -- Texan to Texan, American to American -- that show that all of America is ready for the freedom to marry.
The ruling is the latest in a string of legal decisions to favor of same-sex marriage in predominantly conservative states including cases in Utah, Ohio, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Virginia.
______________________
"Today's court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedent," said U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia. "Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our U.S. Constitution."
The ruling will not go into effect immediately, as it awaits an appeal by the state. However, Garcia said the two couples who filed the lawsuit against the state are likely to win their case in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Following the ruling, Evan Wolfson, founder and president of marriage equality group Freedom to Marry, stated:
Today the 6th federal judge in a row has ruled - in Texas - that there is simply no legitimate justification for denying marriage to loving gay and lesbian couples. The court's holding is solid and serious, and follows the language and logic of the Supreme Court's marriage ruling last year and the Constitution's clear command. With 47 marriage cases in 25 states now moving forward, and the possibility that a freedom to marry case will again reach the Supreme Court as soon as 2015, we must continue the conversations and progress -- Texan to Texan, American to American -- that show that all of America is ready for the freedom to marry.
The ruling is the latest in a string of legal decisions to favor of same-sex marriage in predominantly conservative states including cases in Utah, Ohio, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Virginia.
______________________